On September 09, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Alliance United Insurance Company,
Castania Michele,
Mujo Santiago,
Parra Enrique,
Parra Rodrigo,
Salazar Lorena L.,
and
Ean Holdings Llc,
Ean Holdings Llc.,
Gaines Davon,
Garcia Leticia,
Johnson Joshua,
Johnson Joshua Cabryon,
Mujo Santiago Jr.,
Navagarcia Bianca,
Nava Garcia Bianca Angela,
Salazar Lorena,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/16/2021 03:17 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Salcido,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Christopher P. Mesaros, Esq. SBN 214314
First Law Group
314 E. Rowland St.
Covina, CA 91723
TELEPHONE NO.: (526) 838-f700 FM NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
litiaatlon(rDfirstla.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs. Michele Castania, Rodrlao Parra. Enrlaue Parra
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 275 Magnolia St.
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITYANDZIPCODE: Lona Beach, CA 90802
Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse
BRANCH NAME:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Michele Castania, Rodrigo Parra, Enrique Parra, et al.,
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 19STCV31828 related to 19STCV33415
n
n
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 09/28/2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: S27 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Christopher P. Mesaros, Esq.
n
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified Information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. 5x This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiffs Michele Castania, Rodrigo Parra, Enrique Rodrigo
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
n
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): 09/19/2019
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
n
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
n
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
n
(1) F_fl have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
n
(3) F_fl have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. 0 The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
n
Case arises from a multi-vehicle accident occuring on or about 10/11/2017 at the I/S of Cherry Ave. and Spring St. in Signal
Hill, CA. Plaintiffs suffered various injuries as a result of the impact.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of court,
Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1.20211 •»w.cowts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
September 16, 2021
Case Filing Date
September 09, 2019
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 03/30/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.