On July 26, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Arzola Alejandro,
and
At&T Mobility Services Llc,
Gonzalez Betty,
for Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, C ounty of Los Angeles on 02/07/2020 04:50 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro, Deputy Clerk
CM-110
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address FOR COURT
USE ONLY
Edward Yun (SBN 258245); Sevahn Simonian (SBN 301881)
J. Misa Keelan (SBN 322129
Yun and Simonian, PC
11175 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 420
Los Angeles, CA 90025
TELEPHONE
NO.: 310-954-0823 FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS. (Optional: edwardeye legal.com; misa@yslegal.com
£ Alejandro
SUPERIOR COURT OF ENE COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITYAND
ZIP CODE:Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:Alejandro Arzola
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC., Betty
Gonzales and DOES 1 to 100 inclusive
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘CASE NUMBER:
(Check one). (1 UNLIMITED CASE [[ Limitep CASE
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less) 19STCV26409
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: February 24, 2020 Time:8:30 a.m. Dept.: 37 Div. Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[1] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): J. Misa Keelan
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one).
a. [X1] This statement is submitted by party (name):Plaintiff Alejandro Arzola
b. [] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names).
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): July 26, 2019
b. [] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a [1 All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [1 The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not).
(2) {1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names).
(3) [have had a default entered against them (specify names).
c. [5€] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Does 1-100 as needed
Description of case
a Type of case in complaint 2) cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action).
"Please see attachment 4a"
Page1of5
aim acopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Rulee of Court,
Judicial Cour ules 3.720-3.
Guo TR ty 4260
Document Filed Date
February 07, 2020
Case Filing Date
July 26, 2019
Category
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 02/16/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.