arrow left
arrow right
  • ALEJANDRO ARZOLA VS BETTY GONZALEZ, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ALEJANDRO ARZOLA VS BETTY GONZALEZ, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, C ounty of Los Angeles on 02/07/2020 04:50 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro, Deputy Clerk CM-110 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address FOR COURT USE ONLY Edward Yun (SBN 258245); Sevahn Simonian (SBN 301881) J. Misa Keelan (SBN 322129 Yun and Simonian, PC 11175 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 420 Los Angeles, CA 90025 TELEPHONE NO.: 310-954-0823 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS. (Optional: edwardeye legal.com; misa@yslegal.com £ Alejandro SUPERIOR COURT OF ENE COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITYAND ZIP CODE:Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:Alejandro Arzola DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC., Betty Gonzales and DOES 1 to 100 inclusive CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘CASE NUMBER: (Check one). (1 UNLIMITED CASE [[ Limitep CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) 19STCV26409 A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: February 24, 2020 Time:8:30 a.m. Dept.: 37 Div. Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [1] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): J. Misa Keelan INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one). a. [X1] This statement is submitted by party (name):Plaintiff Alejandro Arzola b. [] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names). Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): July 26, 2019 b. [] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a [1 All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [1 The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not). (2) {1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names). (3) [have had a default entered against them (specify names). c. [5€] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Does 1-100 as needed Description of case a Type of case in complaint 2) cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action). "Please see attachment 4a" Page1of5 aim acopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Rulee of Court, Judicial Cour ules 3.720-3. Guo TR ty 4260