On May 24, 2019 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bautista Sergio,
and
City Of Los Angeles,
Los Angeles World Airports,
for Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/21/2022 09:22 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Coreas,Deputy Clerk
1 Ann M. Asiano, Esq., SBN 094891
David H. You, Esq., SBN 282106
2 Victoria A. Koenitzer, Esq., SBN 322131
CLARK HILL LLP
3 600 West Broadway, Suite 500
San Diego, CA 92101
4 Telephone: (619) 819-2412
Facsimile: (619) 557-0460
5 AAsiano@clarkhill.com
VKoenitzer@clarkhill.com
6
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
7 LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS,
8 A Public Entity
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
11
SERGIO BAUTISTA, Case No. 19STCV18168
12
Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO EX PARTE
13 APPLICATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON
v. MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER
14 RESPONSES; DECLARATION OF VICTORIA
A. KOENITZER
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES
15
WORLD AIRPORTS; and DOES 1 to 10,
16 Hearing: June 22, 2022
Defendants. Time: 8:30 a.m.
17 Dept.: 29
18
19
20
21 Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES and LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS
22 (“Defendants” or “LAWA”) hereby submit the following Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’
23 Ex Parte Application to Continue the hearing on various Motions to Compel Further Responses
24 (“Plaintiff’s Opposition”).
25 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
26 I. Introduction
-
27 This Reply seeks to address and correct the misrepresentations in Plaintiff’s Opposition regarding
28 the meet and confer process with respect to discovery motions at issue in Defendants’ Ex Parte
1
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSE HEARINGS
267621281
Document Filed Date
June 21, 2022
Case Filing Date
May 24, 2019
Category
Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/21/2022 09:22 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Coreas,Deputy Clerk 1 Ann M. Asiano, Esq., SBN 094891 David H. You, Esq., SBN 282106 2 Victoria A. Koenitzer, Esq., SBN 322131 CLARK HILL LLP 3 600 West Broadway, Suite 500 San Diego, CA 92101 4 Telephone: (619) 819-2412 Facsimile: (619) 557-0460 5 AAsiano@clarkhill.com VKoenitzer@clarkhill.com 6 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 7 LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, 8 A Public Entity 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 SERGIO BAUTISTA, Case No. 19STCV18168 12 Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO EX PARTE 13 APPLICATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON v. MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER 14 RESPONSES; DECLARATION OF VICTORIA A. KOENITZER CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES 15 WORLD AIRPORTS; and DOES 1 to 10, 16 Hearing: June 22, 2022 Defendants. Time: 8:30 a.m. 17 Dept.: 29 18 19 20 21 Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES and LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS 22 (“Defendants” or “LAWA”) hereby submit the following Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ 23 Ex Parte Application to Continue the hearing on various Motions to Compel Further Responses 24 (“Plaintiff’s Opposition”). 25 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 26 I. Introduction - 27 This Reply seeks to address and correct the misrepresentations in Plaintiff’s Opposition regarding 28 the meet and confer process with respect to discovery motions at issue in Defendants’ Ex Parte 1 DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE HEARINGS 267621281