arrow left
arrow right
  • SERGIO  BAUTISTA VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SERGIO  BAUTISTA VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Ann M. Asiano, Esq. (SBN 94891) David H. You, Esq. (SBN 282106) Victoria A. Koenitzer, Esq. (SBN 322131) CLARK HILL LLP 600 West Broadway, Suite 500 San Diego, California 92101 FILED Telephone: (619) 557-0404 Superior Court of California Facsimile: (619) 557-0460 Countyof Los Angales AAsiano@elarkhill.com 08/18/2022 DYou@celarkhill.com Sheri R Carter, Executive Office / Cenk af Court VKoenitzer@clarkhill.com By. S. Azizian Deputy Attorneys for Defendants LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS and CITY OF LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Il SERGIO BAUTISTA, Case No.: 19STCV18168 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. JOINT STIPULATION AND fPROPOSED] 14 ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTIONS TO CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES 15 WORLD AIRPORTS, and DOES 1-10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 The parties to the above-entitled action hereby jointly stipulate as follows: 20 WHEREAS the Parties agree and hereby stipulate to continue the five motion to compel further 21 response hearing dates that are currently set for August 30, 2022. 22 WHEREAS the Parties agree to continue the five motion to compel further response hearing 23 dates that are currently set for August 30, 2022 for an additional 60 days in order to allow for the parties 24 to provide supplemental discovery responses and meet and confer and to avoid potentially unnecessary 25 oppositions and reply briefs. 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES ClarkHill\60567\4 1 6605\268124817.v1-8/5/22