arrow left
arrow right
  • CLAUDIO  R.  AGUIRRE  VS JOSE  A.  OSORIO, ET AL. Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CLAUDIO  R.  AGUIRRE  VS JOSE  A.  OSORIO, ET AL. Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/17/2020 03:13 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Vargas,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Robin E Paley, Esw (SBN: 118138) The Law Offices of Robin E Paley, a PLC 16430 Ventura Blvd, Suite 301 Encino, CA 91436 TELEPHONE NO.: (818)386-2995 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): paleylawoffices@gmail.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): CLAUDIO R. AGUIRRE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Ave. MAILING ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Ave. CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chatsworth, 91311 BRANCH NAME: North Valley District PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: CLAUDIO R. AGUIRRE DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JOSE A. OSORIO AND MARIA ALMA BUENROSTRO OSORIO CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): D✖ UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE 20CHCV00185 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: August 11, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: F49 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): D✖ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Venetia Byars INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. ✖ DThis statement is submitted by party (name): CLAUDIO R. AGUIRRE b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): March 11, 2020 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. ✖ DAll parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D✖ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D✖ have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): JOSE A. OSORIO AND MARIA ALMA BUENROSTRO OSORIO (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in D✖ complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Breach of Contract Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov