arrow left
arrow right
  • CLAUDIO  R.  AGUIRRE  VS JOSE  A.  OSORIO, ET AL. Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CLAUDIO  R.  AGUIRRE  VS JOSE  A.  OSORIO, ET AL. Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/11/2021 12:32 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Reyna,Deputy Clerk DocuSign Envelope ID: 383C536C-AB05-4FB4-AEAF-83E414C48308 Law Offices of Robin E. Paley, a PLC 1 Robin E. Paley, Esq. SBN: 118138 2 16430 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 301 Encino, CA 91436 3 Tel: (818) 386-2995 Fax: (818) 386-0684 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff, Claudio R. Aguirre 6 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, NORTH VALLEY DISTRICT 8 9 CLAUDIO R. AGUIRRE, Case No. 20CHCV00185 10 Plaintiff, 11 AMENDED NOTICE OF RULING vs. 12 Date: June 8, 2021 13 Time: 8:30 JOSE A. OSORIO, an individual; MARIA Department: F49 14 ALMA BUENROSTRO OSORIO, an 15 individual; and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Motion to Compel Responses to Form 21 Interrogatories came on regularly for hearing on June 8, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Department F49 of 22 the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – North Valley District, Chatsworth 23 Courthouse, located at 9425 Penfield Avenue, Chatsworth, CA 91311. Venetia Byars, Esq. 24 appeared telephonically for Plaintiff Claudio R. Aguirre. Mark Brifman, Esq. appeared 25 telephonically on behalf of Defendant Jose Osorio. 26 27 The Court ordered that the Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories (set 28 one) was granted. Defendant did not respond to the propounded Form Interrogatories (set one). 29 30 31