arrow left
arrow right
  • CLAUDIO  R.  AGUIRRE  VS JOSE  A.  OSORIO, ET AL. Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CLAUDIO  R.  AGUIRRE  VS JOSE  A.  OSORIO, ET AL. Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

JUD-100 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Robin E. Paley SBN: 118138 To keep other people from 16430 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 301 seeing what you entered on Encino, CA 91436 your form, please press the TELEPHONE NO.: 818-386-2995 FAX NO. (Optional): Clear This Form button at the E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): info@robinpaleylaw.com end of the form when finished. ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff CLAUDIO AGUIRRE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue MAILING ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chatsworth 91311 BRANCH NAME: Chatsworth Courthouse PLAINTIFF: CLAUDIO AGUIRRE DEFENDANT: JOSE A. OSORIO; MARIA ALMA BUENROSTRO OSORIO CASE NUMBER: JUDGMENT By Clerk By Default After Court Trial 20CHCV00185 ✔ By Court ✔ On Stipulation Defendant Did Not Appear at Trial JUDGMENT 1. BY DEFAULT a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint. b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law. c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application. d. Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of this state for the recovery of money. e. Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered (1) plaintiff's testimony and other evidence. (2) plaintiff's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)). 2. ✔ ON STIPULATION Electronically Received 04/04/2022 08:18 PM a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated judgment and b. ✔ the signed written stipulation was filed in the case. c. ✔ the stipulation was stated in open court the stipulation was stated on the record. 3. AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence. a. The case was tried on (date and time): before (name of judicial officer): b. Appearances by: Plaintiff (name each): Plaintiff's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) Continued on Attachment 3b. Defendant (name each): Defendant 's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) Continued on Attachment 3b. c. Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial. d. A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) was not was requested. Page 1 of 2 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JUDGMENT Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6 JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002]