On March 11, 2020 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Aguirre Claudio R.,
and
Buenrostro Osorio Maria Alma,
Osorio Jose A.,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
JUD-100
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Robin E. Paley SBN: 118138 To keep other people from
16430 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 301 seeing what you entered on
Encino, CA 91436 your form, please press the
TELEPHONE NO.: 818-386-2995 FAX NO. (Optional): Clear This Form button at the
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): info@robinpaleylaw.com end of the form when finished.
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff CLAUDIO AGUIRRE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue
MAILING ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chatsworth 91311
BRANCH NAME: Chatsworth Courthouse
PLAINTIFF: CLAUDIO AGUIRRE
DEFENDANT: JOSE A. OSORIO; MARIA ALMA BUENROSTRO OSORIO
CASE NUMBER:
JUDGMENT
By Clerk By Default After Court Trial 20CHCV00185
✔ By Court ✔ On Stipulation Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d. Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of
this state for the recovery of money.
e. Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2) plaintiff's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. ✔ ON STIPULATION
Electronically Received 04/04/2022 08:18 PM
a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated
judgment and
b. ✔ the signed written stipulation was filed in the case.
c. ✔ the stipulation was stated in open court the stipulation was stated on the record.
3. AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
Plaintiff (name each): Plaintiff's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
Defendant (name each): Defendant 's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
c. Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
d. A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) was not was requested.
Page 1 of 2
Form Approved for Optional Use
Judicial Council of California
JUDGMENT Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6
JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002]
Document Filed Date
August 22, 2022
Case Filing Date
March 11, 2020
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 03/07/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.