On December 03, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cardenas Amalia,
Cardenas Raul,
and
Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc. A California Corporation,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/25/2020 03:05 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Mark Romano (SBN 244113)
ROMANO STANCROFF PC
360 N. Pacific Coast Hwy., Ste. 1010, El Segundo, CA 90245
TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 477-7990 FAX NO. (Optional): (310) 477-7995
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Amalia Cardenas and Raul Cardenas
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDREss, 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: same as above
c1TvANDz1PcoDE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Amalia Cardenas and Raul Cardenas
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc., et al
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): w UNLIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded
D LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded is $25,000
19STCV43584
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: March 13, 2020 Time: 9:00am Dept.: 61 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
CJ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. [ZJ This statement is submitted by party (name): Amalia Cardenas and Raul Cardenas
b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): December 03, 2019
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. [ZJ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. CJ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. CJ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in [Z] complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Violation of Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act; and Magnuson-Moss Act, Lemon Law case (as to Plaintiffs'
2013 Mitsubishi Lancer).
Pa e 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3. 720-3. 730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
February 25, 2020
Case Filing Date
December 03, 2019
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/23/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.