arrow left
arrow right
  • AMALIA CARDENAS, ET AL. VS MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • AMALIA CARDENAS, ET AL. VS MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/25/2020 03:05 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Mark Romano (SBN 244113) ROMANO STANCROFF PC 360 N. Pacific Coast Hwy., Ste. 1010, El Segundo, CA 90245 TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 477-7990 FAX NO. (Optional): (310) 477-7995 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Amalia Cardenas and Raul Cardenas SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDREss, 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: same as above c1TvANDz1PcoDE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Amalia Cardenas and Raul Cardenas DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc., et al CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): w UNLIMITED CASE (Amount demanded D LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded is $25,000 19STCV43584 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: March 13, 2020 Time: 9:00am Dept.: 61 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): CJ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. [ZJ This statement is submitted by party (name): Amalia Cardenas and Raul Cardenas b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): December 03, 2019 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. [ZJ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. CJ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. CJ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in [Z] complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Violation of Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act; and Magnuson-Moss Act, Lemon Law case (as to Plaintiffs' 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer). Pa e 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3. 720-3. 730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov