On December 03, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cardenas Amalia,
Cardenas Raul,
and
Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc. A California Corporation,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Reserved for Clerk's Filing Stamp
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIL a
COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: Superiot 1 Court of Californi
County 0} f Los Angeles
PLAINTIFF: MAR 13 2020
CAR dIENAS copOfficer/Clerk
DEFENDANT: Deputy
4 pTSu Brs4s ER
a
7 7a 5 og
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
‘ ea ee California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq., and have filed case management statements on Judicial
Council form CM-110.
The case management conference is continued to at 8:30 a.m. or
am. p.m. due to one or both parties’ non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule
3.720 et seq is ordered to show cause at said conference
why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et. seq
2. Parties =
ere [tis not-F] will be a cross-complaint(s) in this matter.
ere med Defendants/Cross-Defendants have been served and have appeared, been defaulted or dismissed
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on
should not be imposed for failure to cause entry of Default/Default Judgment.
why sanctions, including dismissal
oO With the agreement of Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant, all unserved Defendants/Cross-Defendants and Does/Roes are
dismissed/severed as of
[al Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant is ordered to show cause on why sanctions, including dismissal, should not be
imposed for failure to serve ° SRI. Wed in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq
Med A+!
i. “threes oe Ware arbitration
ordered] [_] mediation [_] neutral evaluation]
Voluntary settlement conference through [L] court services [] private neutral]. (See L.A.S.C. Local Rules, Chapter 12.)
(J The ADR process must be completed by
[LLaepost-ADR status conference is set for —ehefz
te
+ T
4. Trial Set ting
intiff/Defendant-has demanded jury and id! asp iury fees. ( ‘Code Civ. Proc., § 631.)
(_Afinarstatus conference is set for
[ithease is set forjury/court trial on
[UL Fint€ estimated for trial is days.
at 8:30 a.m.
tA.
“ae m.
p.m.
J] p.m.
oO The identity of trial counsel is oO set forth in parties’ case management statements (form CM-110):
Oo as follows: For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
5. Other Issues
Pursuant to [_] stipulation [_] court order, the case is reclassified to limited jurisdiction.
CL There is a potentially related case, number See further order below.
(JA mandatory settlement conference per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380, is set for
at a.m. _] p.m. The parties are ordered to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380
(1 The court further orders as follows:
Notice Bis ‘Waived Oo shall be given by Plaintiff/Defendant Oo has
Dated 2/es ZED
O given by delivery of a ps £opy ofthis order to counsel in open court.
GREGUAYIEESIAN
LACIV 134 (Rev. 04/09) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq.
LASC Approved 09-03
DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL - COURT FILE COPIES — PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS:
Document Filed Date
March 13, 2020
Case Filing Date
December 03, 2019
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/23/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Reserved for Clerk's Filing Stamp SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIL a COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: Superiot 1 Court of Californi County 0} f Los Angeles PLAINTIFF: MAR 13 2020 CAR dIENAS copOfficer/Clerk DEFENDANT: Deputy 4 pTSu Brs4s ER a 7 7a 5 og CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER ‘ ea ee California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq., and have filed case management statements on Judicial Council form CM-110. The case management conference is continued to at 8:30 a.m. or am. p.m. due to one or both parties’ non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq is ordered to show cause at said conference why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et. seq 2. Parties = ere [tis not-F] will be a cross-complaint(s) in this matter. ere med Defendants/Cross-Defendants have been served and have appeared, been defaulted or dismissed Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on should not be imposed for failure to cause entry of Default/Default Judgment. why sanctions, including dismissal oO With the agreement of Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant, all unserved Defendants/Cross-Defendants and Does/Roes are dismissed/severed as of [al Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant is ordered to show cause on why sanctions, including dismissal, should not be imposed for failure to serve ° SRI. Wed in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq Med A+! i. “threes oe Ware arbitration ordered] [_] mediation [_] neutral evaluation] Voluntary settlement conference through [L] court services [] private neutral]. (See L.A.S.C. Local Rules, Chapter 12.) (J The ADR process must be completed by [LLaepost-ADR status conference is set for —ehefz te + T 4. Trial Set ting intiff/Defendant-has demanded jury and id! asp iury fees. ( ‘Code Civ. Proc., § 631.) (_Afinarstatus conference is set for [ithease is set forjury/court trial on [UL Fint€ estimated for trial is days. at 8:30 a.m. tA. “ae m. p.m. J] p.m. oO The identity of trial counsel is oO set forth in parties’ case management statements (form CM-110): Oo as follows: For Plaintiff: For Defendant: 5. Other Issues Pursuant to [_] stipulation [_] court order, the case is reclassified to limited jurisdiction. CL There is a potentially related case, number See further order below. (JA mandatory settlement conference per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380, is set for at a.m. _] p.m. The parties are ordered to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380 (1 The court further orders as follows: Notice Bis ‘Waived Oo shall be given by Plaintiff/Defendant Oo has Dated 2/es ZED O given by delivery of a ps £opy ofthis order to counsel in open court. GREGUAYIEESIAN LACIV 134 (Rev. 04/09) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq. LASC Approved 09-03 DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL - COURT FILE COPIES — PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS: