arrow left
arrow right
  • DBP INVESTMENTS VS KING PLAZA CENTER(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • DBP INVESTMENTS VS KING PLAZA CENTER(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • DBP INVESTMENTS VS KING PLAZA CENTER(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • DBP INVESTMENTS VS KING PLAZA CENTER(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 STEVEN B. PISER, SBN 62414 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN B. PISER 2 A Professional Corporation 1970 Broadway, Suite 600 3 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 835-5582 4 JOHN L. FITZGERALD, SBN 126613 5 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. FITZGERALD 177 Bovet Road, Suite 600 6 San Mateo, California 94402 Telephone: (650) 638-2386 7 8 Attorneys for DBP INVESTMENTS, 9 a California General Partnership 10 11 12 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 14 15 DBP INVESTMENTS, a California General ) CASE NO. CIV538897 Partnership, ) (CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE #19CIV07118) 16 ) Plaintiff, ) 17 ) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO v. ) STRIKE MEMORANDUM OF COSTS 18 ) KING PLAZA CENTER, LLC, a Delaware ) DATE : AUGUST 4, 2023 19 Limited Liability Company, BUA-QUACH, ) TIME : 9:00 A.M. an individual, SOVAN LIEN, an individual, ) DEPT. : 21 20 DONG VUONG, an individual, THANH ) LAI, and DOES 1 through 10 ) 21 ) Defendants. ) 22 ) 23 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 4, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 21 of the 24 above-entitled court, located at 400 County Center, Redwood City, California, or as soon 25 thereafter as the matter can be heard, plaintiff DBP Investments will seek an order striking the 26 cost bill filed by King Plaza Center, LLC. 27 This motion will be based on the grounds that King was not the prevailing party because 28 it did not achieve its litigation objective and DBP secured the relief it sought. as sought in its Law Offices of Steven B. Piser 1 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE MEMORANDUM OF COSTS 1 prayer, that DBP not obtain any relief and the complaint be dismissed, with prejudice. 2 This motion is made pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1700(b)(1) and Code of Civil 3 Procedure Section 1032. 4 This motion is based upon this notice, the points and authorities, request for judicial 5 notice and such other and further evidence that may be presented at the hearing. 6 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN B. PISER A Professional Corporation 7 8 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. FITZGERALD 9 DATED: May 22, 2023 By: 10 STEVEN B. PISER 11 Attorney for DBP INVESTMENTS 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Law Offices of Steven B. Piser 2 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE MEMORANDUM OF COSTS