On September 11, 2020 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Nash John,
Nash Michael,
and
Williams Rosie,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
oA
oa FILE!
r Cor urt of Califomla
of Los Angeles
FEB 282023
David W. Slayton, Executive OtficarClerk of Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
By: A. Rosas, Deputy
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT 74
MICHAEL NASH, et al.; Case No.: 20STCV34788
Plaintiffs, Hearing Date: February 28, 2023
Time: 8:30 a.m.
VS.
10
ROSIE WILLIAMS; ORDER RE:
11
Defendant.
12 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
13
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Rosie Williams
14
RESPONDING PARTY: None
15
16 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
17
The court considered the moving papers in connection with this motion.
18
19
BACKGROUND
20
On September 11, 2020, Plaintiffs Michael Nash and John Nash filed a complaint against
21
Defendant Rosie Williams. The First Amended Complaint alleged nine causes of action: (1)
22
Financial Elder Abuse, (2) Accounting, (3) Conversion, (4) Intentional Misrepresentation, (5)
23 Negligent Misrepresentation, (6) Cancellation of Instrument, (7) Constructive Trust, (8) Breach
24 of Oral Contract, and (9) Quiet Title. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant wrongfully obtained a Quit
Claim Deed of the subject property from their mother prior to her death. Plaintiffs allege that
26
Defendant is intending to sell the subject Property but is not sharing the profits, despite the
27
Plaintiffs’ contention the Decedent intended for the profits to be shared with Plaintiffs.
28
Document Filed Date
February 28, 2023
Case Filing Date
September 11, 2020
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Before Trial - Lack of Prosecution 09/20/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
oA oa FILE! r Cor urt of Califomla of Los Angeles FEB 282023 David W. Slayton, Executive OtficarClerk of Court SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA By: A. Rosas, Deputy COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT 74 MICHAEL NASH, et al.; Case No.: 20STCV34788 Plaintiffs, Hearing Date: February 28, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. VS. 10 ROSIE WILLIAMS; ORDER RE: 11 Defendant. 12 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 13 MOVING PARTY: Defendant Rosie Williams 14 RESPONDING PARTY: None 15 16 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 17 The court considered the moving papers in connection with this motion. 18 19 BACKGROUND 20 On September 11, 2020, Plaintiffs Michael Nash and John Nash filed a complaint against 21 Defendant Rosie Williams. The First Amended Complaint alleged nine causes of action: (1) 22 Financial Elder Abuse, (2) Accounting, (3) Conversion, (4) Intentional Misrepresentation, (5) 23 Negligent Misrepresentation, (6) Cancellation of Instrument, (7) Constructive Trust, (8) Breach 24 of Oral Contract, and (9) Quiet Title. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant wrongfully obtained a Quit Claim Deed of the subject property from their mother prior to her death. Plaintiffs allege that 26 Defendant is intending to sell the subject Property but is not sharing the profits, despite the 27 Plaintiffs’ contention the Decedent intended for the profits to be shared with Plaintiffs. 28