On July 27, 2020 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
A-One Commercial Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc.,
Arboleda Alain Montoya,
Le Michael,
and
A-One Commercial Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc.,
Arboleda Alain Montoya,
United Clean Trucks Inc.,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/01/2020 01:40 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by C. Aquino,Deputy Clerk
1 Walt Pennington, SBN 214470
Pennington Law Firm
2 3302 30th Street
San Diego, CA 92104-4535
3 619 940 6157
wpennington@pennfirm.com
4
Robert J. Pecora, SBN 106167
5 Pecora & Cline
7855 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 408
6 La Jolla, California 92037
Telephone: (858) 454-4014
7 Facsimile (858) 454-3548
8 Attorneys for Michael Le, Plaintiff
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
11 MICHAEL LE, Case No. 20STCV28278
12 Plaintiff PLAINTIFF MICHAEL LE’S OPPOSITION
SAN DIEGO, CA 92104-4535
TO INTERVENOR, A-ONE COMMERCIAL
PENNINGTON LAW FIRM
13 v. INSURANCE RISK RETENTION GROUP,
3302 30TH STREET
INC.’S MOTION TO INTERVENE IN
14 ALAIN MONTOYA ACTION ON BEHALF OF UNITED CLEAN
ARBOLEDA, TRUCKS, INC.
15
UNITED CLEAN TRUCKS, INC. Hearing Date: October 23, 2020
16 Time: 8:30 a.m.
AND
17 Dept: 29
DOES 1-20. Judge: Kristin Escalante
18
Defendants Date Action Filed: July 27, 2020
19 Trial Date: January 24, 2022
20
21
22 RELIEF REQUESTED
23 Intervention by A-One Commercial Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. (“A-
24 One”) is not needed because UCTI’s “interest is adequately represented by one or more
25 of the existing parties.” Code of Civil Procedure section 387 (d)(1)(B).
26 Intervenor A-One’s proposed answer is defective pursuant to Code of Civil
27 Procedure section 430.20 (a) because none of the affirmative defenses “state facts
28 Page 1 of 9
Plaintiff Michael Le’s Opposition to Intervenor, A-One Commercial Insurance Risk
Retention Group, Inc.’s Motion to Intervene in Action on Behalf of United Clean
Trucks, Inc.
Document Filed Date
October 01, 2020
Case Filing Date
July 27, 2020
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Before Trial - Lack of Prosecution 01/24/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/01/2020 01:40 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by C. Aquino,Deputy Clerk 1 Walt Pennington, SBN 214470 Pennington Law Firm 2 3302 30th Street San Diego, CA 92104-4535 3 619 940 6157 wpennington@pennfirm.com 4 Robert J. Pecora, SBN 106167 5 Pecora & Cline 7855 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 408 6 La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: (858) 454-4014 7 Facsimile (858) 454-3548 8 Attorneys for Michael Le, Plaintiff 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 MICHAEL LE, Case No. 20STCV28278 12 Plaintiff PLAINTIFF MICHAEL LE’S OPPOSITION SAN DIEGO, CA 92104-4535 TO INTERVENOR, A-ONE COMMERCIAL PENNINGTON LAW FIRM 13 v. INSURANCE RISK RETENTION GROUP, 3302 30TH STREET INC.’S MOTION TO INTERVENE IN 14 ALAIN MONTOYA ACTION ON BEHALF OF UNITED CLEAN ARBOLEDA, TRUCKS, INC. 15 UNITED CLEAN TRUCKS, INC. Hearing Date: October 23, 2020 16 Time: 8:30 a.m. AND 17 Dept: 29 DOES 1-20. Judge: Kristin Escalante 18 Defendants Date Action Filed: July 27, 2020 19 Trial Date: January 24, 2022 20 21 22 RELIEF REQUESTED 23 Intervention by A-One Commercial Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. (“A- 24 One”) is not needed because UCTI’s “interest is adequately represented by one or more 25 of the existing parties.” Code of Civil Procedure section 387 (d)(1)(B). 26 Intervenor A-One’s proposed answer is defective pursuant to Code of Civil 27 Procedure section 430.20 (a) because none of the affirmative defenses “state facts 28 Page 1 of 9 Plaintiff Michael Le’s Opposition to Intervenor, A-One Commercial Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.’s Motion to Intervene in Action on Behalf of United Clean Trucks, Inc.