arrow left
arrow right
  • TAMMY FENNEL, ET AL. VS TODRYS LANG, ET AL. Wrongful Eviction Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • TAMMY FENNEL, ET AL. VS TODRYS LANG, ET AL. Wrongful Eviction Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/26/2022 03:00 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Gregory J. Bramlage, Esq. (SBN 180534) MACDONALD & CODY, LLP 500 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90071 TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 627-6800 FAX NO. (Optional): (213) 622-2857 E-MAIL ADDRESS: gbramlage@macdonaldcody.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants Todrys Lang and Katherine Lang SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME: Central District PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tammy Fennel and Janae Fennell DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Todrys Lang and Katherine Lang CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 20STCV37230 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: September 6, 2022 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 17 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Gregory J. Bramlage INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Defendants Todrys Lang and Katherine Lang 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): September 29, 2020 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiff alleges breach of contract, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, breach of the implied warranty of habitability, breach of the statutory warranty of habitability, negligence, nuisance, fraud, violation of Civil Code Sections 1942.4, 1950.5, 52.1, violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 151 .09, etc. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov