On September 29, 2020 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Fennel Janae,
Fennel Tammy,
and
Lang Katherine,
Lang Todrys,
for Wrongful Eviction Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/26/2022 03:00 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Gregory J. Bramlage, Esq. (SBN 180534)
MACDONALD & CODY, LLP
500 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90071
TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 627-6800 FAX NO. (Optional): (213) 622-2857
E-MAIL ADDRESS: gbramlage@macdonaldcody.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants Todrys Lang and Katherine Lang
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012
BRANCH NAME: Central District
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tammy Fennel and Janae Fennell
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Todrys Lang and Katherine Lang
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 20STCV37230
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: September 6, 2022 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 17 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Gregory J. Bramlage
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name):
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Defendants Todrys Lang and Katherine Lang
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): September 29, 2020
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Plaintiff alleges breach of contract, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, breach of the implied warranty of
habitability, breach of the statutory warranty of habitability, negligence, nuisance, fraud, violation of Civil Code
Sections 1942.4, 1950.5, 52.1, violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 151 .09, etc.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
August 26, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 29, 2020
Category
Wrongful Eviction Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 06/29/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.