Judgment: CORY BROOKSHIRE VS COURT CALL, LLC

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/06/2022 10:08 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by P. Perez,Deputy Clerk




                     1 KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK LLP
                       Andrew J. Waxler 113682
                     2 Jennifer E. Newcomb 287314
                       21515 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 450
                     3 Torrance, California 90503
                       Telephone: (310) 540-2000
                     4 Facsimile: (310) 550-6609
                       Email: awaxler@kdvlaw.com
                     5 Email: jnewcomb@kdvlaw.com
                     6 Attorneys for Defendant
                       COURTCALL, LLC erroneously sued
                     7 and served as COURT CALL, LLC
                     8
                     9                               SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                   10                                              FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                   11
                   12 CORY BROOKSHIRE,                                                              )    Case No. 21TRCV00056
                                                                                                    )
                   13                            Plaintiff,                                         )    [Assigned to Judge Gary Y. Tanaka]
                                                                                                    )
                   14                vs.                                                            )    RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
                                                                                                    )    EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO
                   15 COURT CALL, LLC (a California                                                 )    DEFENDANT’S PROPOSED
                      Corporation) and DOES 1through 25,                                            )    JUDGMENT DATED MAY 4, 2022
                   16 inclusive,                                                                    )
                                                                                                    )
                   17                            Defendants.                                        )
                                                                                                    )    Complaint Filed: January 27, 2021
                   18                                                                               )    Trial Date:      Not Yet Set
                                                                                                    )
                   19                                                                               )
                                                                                                    )
                   20                                                                               )
                                                                                                    )
                   21                                                                               )
                                                                                                    )
                   22
                   23                Defendant CourtCall, LCC (“Defendant”) submits this response to Plaintiff’s
                   24 objections to the proposed judgment.
                   25                While the caption on Plaintiff’s “Objections” provides that he is objecting to the
                   26 proposed judgment filed by Defendant, his pleading merely tries to obtain relief from his
                   27 failure to timely file a motion to tax costs. Defendant filed its Memorandum of Costs on
                   28

                                                                                1
                                                 RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S
                                                              PROPOSED JUDGMENT DATED MAY 4, 2022