On October 22, 2020 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Amos Financial Llc,
and
1 Through 25 Inclusive Does,
Keybank National Association A Corporation,
Morales Fernando,
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. As Nominee For Quicken Loans Inc. Its Successors And Assigns,
Pope Lawrence E. Sr.,
Pope Nicole E.,
Portfolio Recovery Associates Llc,
for Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/15/2022 03:29 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk
1 HALL GRIFFIN LLP
HOWARD D. HALL, State Bar No. 145024
2 hdhall@hallgriffin.com
STEPHANIE A. PITTALUGA, State Bar No. 182161
3 spittaluga@hallgriffin.com
1851 East First Street, 10th Floor
4 Santa Ana, California 92705-4052
Telephone: (714) 918-7000
5 Facsimile: (714) 918-6996
6 Attorneys for Defendant
FERNANDO MORELOS
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
10
11 AMOS FINANCIAL, LLC, CASE NO. 20STCV40687
12 Plaintiff, JUDGE: Hon. Armen Tamzarian
DEPT.: 52
13 vs.
DEFENDANT FERNANDO MORELOS’S
14 LAWRENCE E. POPE SR., an individual; LIMITED OPPOSITION TO
NICOLE E. POPE, an individual; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE
15 FERNANDO MORELOS, an individual; SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES,
16 LLC; KEYBANK NATIONAL DATE: December 1, 2022
ASSOCIATION, a corporation; MORTGAGE TIME: 9:00 a.m.
17 ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, DEPT.: 52
INC., AS NOMINEE FOR QUICKEN
18 LOANS, INC., ITS SUCCESSORS AND ACTION FILED: October 22, 2020
ASSIGNS and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, TRIAL DATE: None Set
19
Defendants.
20
21 Plaintiff Amos Financial, LLC (“Plaintiff”) seeks an Order enforcing certain terms of the
22 settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit “A” to its Motion.
23 Plaintiff seeks to compel only Defendant Nicole E. Pope (“Ms. Pope”) to comply with the
24 Settlement Agreement.
25 Defendant Fernando Morelos (“Morelos”) supports this Motion, but pursuant to Code of
26 Civil Procedure section 664.6, the entirety of the Settlement Agreement should be enforced.
27 Enforcement of only selected terms of the Settlement Agreement fails to comply with Section
28
DEFENDANT FERNANDO MORELOS’S LIMITED OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
4876-2767-8524.2
Document Filed Date
November 15, 2022
Case Filing Date
October 22, 2020
Category
Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 05/17/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.