arrow left
arrow right
  • Brilliant vs Black26: Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Brilliant vs Black26: Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Brilliant vs Black26: Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Brilliant vs Black26: Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 DAVIN R. BACHO (SBN 282613) JEFFREY S. LYONS (SBN 227277) 2 CLEMENT, FITZPATRICK & KENWORTHY 3 3333 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 200 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 4 Telephone: (707) 523-1181 Facsimile: (707) 546-1360 5 Email: dbacho@cfk.com or jlyons@cfk.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Cross-Defendants 7 Barry Brilliant and Dagmar Hoheneck-Smith 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SONOMA 10 11 12 BARRY BRILLIANT, an individual; and Case No. SCV-267406 DAGMAR K. HOHENECK-SMITH, an 13 individual and as trustee of THE DAGMAR HOHENECK-SMITH TRUST dated December NOTICE OF NON-REPLY TO 14 PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO 14, 2010, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR NEW 15 TRIAL Plaintiffs, 16 vs. Trial Judge: Hon. Christopher M. Honigsberg 17 MITCHELL G. BLACK, an individual and dba Trial Date: February 24, 2023 BLACK KNIGHT VINEYARDS; DEANNE G. 18 BLACK, an individual and dba BLACK Date: 5/26/23 19 KNIGHT VINEYARDS; and DOES ONE Time: 8:30 a.m. through TWENTY, inclusive, Dept: 18 20 Defendants. 21 _______________________________________ 22 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION 23 24 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 -1- NOTICE OF NON-REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that there has been no reply filed or served as to Plaintiffs’ 3 Opposition To Defendants’ Motion For New Trial as prescribed under California Code of Civil 4 Procedure §659a. 5 Dated: May 3, 2023 CLEMENT, FITZPATRICK & KENWORTHY 6 By: /s/ Davin R. Bacho 7 DAVIN R. BACHO Plaintiffs and Cross-Defendants 8 Barry Brilliant and Dagmar Hoheneck-Smith 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- NOTICE OF NON-REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL