arrow left
arrow right
  • ALEC HORTON VS RIV HALTOM, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ALEC HORTON VS RIV HALTOM, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/27/2021 11:59 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Hung,Deputy Clerk 1 Joseph S. Farzam, Esq. (SBN 210817) joseph@farzamlaw.com 2 Henna H. Choi, Esq. (SBN 306254) henna@farzamlaw.com 3 Giorgio O. Panagos, Esq. (SBN 325892) 4 giorgio@farzamlaw.com JOSEPH FARZAM LAW FIRM 5 A Professional Law Corporation 11766 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 280 6 Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: (310) 226-6890 7 Facsimile: (310) 226-6891 E-Service Email: eservice-emp@farzamlaw.com 8 Attorney for Plaintiff ALEC HORTON 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE 12 13 ALEC HORTON, an individual, Case No.: 20STCV49196 14 Plaintiff, Assigned for All Purposes to The Honorable John R. Takasugi, Dept. 17 15 v. 16 PLAINTIFF ALEC HORTON’S NOTICE MW BHCC, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN 17 Company dba GRIFFIN CLUB LOS ORDER COMPELLING DEFENDANT ANGELES; RIV HALTOM; an Individual; BITA NASSERI TO PROVIDE FURTHER 18 BITA NASSERI; an Individual; and DOES 1 RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS through 20, inclusive, FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, 19 SET ONE, AND REQUEST FOR Defendants. MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE 20 AMOUNT OF $3,486.65; MEMORANDUM 21 OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF 22 [Filed concurrently with Separate Statement of 23 Issues in Dispute pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345; Omnibus Declaration of 24 Giorgio O. Panagos ISO; and [Proposed] Order] 25 Date: October 22, 2021 26 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 17 27 Reservation ID 433818739082 28 Complaint Filed: December 23, 2020 Trial Date: August 29, 2022 PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES BY DEFENDANT TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE