arrow left
arrow right
  • ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY VS JAMES GRAY, ET AL. Other Civil Petition (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY VS JAMES GRAY, ET AL. Other Civil Petition (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Superior Court of California FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles APR 19 2022 County of Los Angeles Sherri R. C; ive Qtican(Clerk of Court By. Deputy Department 61 JAMES GRAY, et al., Petitioners, Vv. ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent. D. Toure Case No.: 21STCP01208 Date: April 19, 2022 AE | RULING RE: PETITIONERS JAMES AND VICKEY GRAY’S MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD RESPONDENT ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY CO.’S MOTION TO CORRECT CONTRACTUAL ARBITRATION AWARD. Petitioners James and Vickey Gray’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award is DENIED Respondent Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Co.’s Motion to Correct Contractual Arbitration Award is GRANTED. Defendant to provide notice. IL. PETITION TO CORRECT ARBITRATION AWARD Courts may correct an arbitration award under the following circumstances: (a) There was an evident miscalculation of figures or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award: (b) The arbitrators exceeded their powers but the award may be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision upon the controversy submitted; or (c) The award is imperfect in a matter of form, not affecting the merits of the controversy. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1286.6, subd. (a), (b), (c).) California public policy supports the use of private arbitration to resolve disputes. To promote this alternative means of dispute resolution, the law minimizes judicial intervention in the proceedings, in part, by the doctrine of arbitral finality. Thus, the general rule is that ‘an arbitrator's decision cannot be reviewed for errors of fact or law. Both because it vindicates the intentions of the parties that the award be final, and because an arbitrator is not ordinarily constrained to decide according to