arrow left
arrow right
  • JENNIFER G. KIM VS THOMAS J. KIM, ET AL. Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JENNIFER G. KIM VS THOMAS J. KIM, ET AL. Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/04/2022 10:52 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mohammadi,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Thomas J. Borchard, Esq. (SBN 104008); Denise Ho, Esq. (SBN 299619) BORCHARD & CALLAHAN, APC 25909 Pala, Suite 300, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 TELEPHONE NO.: (949) 457-9505 FAX NO. (Optional): (949) 457-1666 E-MAIL ADDRESS: tborchard@borchardlaw.com; dho@borchardlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Jennifer G. Kim SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street MAILING ADDRESS: same CITY AND ZIP CODE: Santa Monica, CA 90401 BRANCH NAME: Santa Monica Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer G. KIm DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Thomas J. Kim, Shelli Carter, et. al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): ✖ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 21SMCV01667 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 4/18/2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: N Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): ✖ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Denise Ho INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. ✖ This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Jennifer G. Kim b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 10/15/2021 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. ✖ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in ✖ complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Fraudulent transfer of property - Violation of the UVTA for (1) actual fraud and conspirarcy to committ fraud, and (2) constructive fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov