On October 15, 2021 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Kim Jennifer G.,
and
Carter Shelli,
Kim Thomas J.,
for Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/04/2022 10:52 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mohammadi,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Thomas J. Borchard, Esq. (SBN 104008); Denise Ho, Esq. (SBN 299619)
BORCHARD & CALLAHAN, APC
25909 Pala, Suite 300, Mission Viejo, CA 92691
TELEPHONE NO.: (949) 457-9505 FAX NO. (Optional): (949)
457-1666
E-MAIL ADDRESS: tborchard@borchardlaw.com; dho@borchardlaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Jennifer G. Kim
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street
MAILING ADDRESS: same
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Santa Monica, CA 90401
BRANCH NAME: Santa Monica Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer G. KIm
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Thomas J. Kim, Shelli Carter, et. al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): ✖ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 21SMCV01667
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 4/18/2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: N Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
✖ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Denise Ho
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. ✖ This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Jennifer G. Kim
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): 10/15/2021
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. ✖ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in ✖ complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Fraudulent transfer of property - Violation of the UVTA for (1) actual fraud and conspirarcy to committ fraud, and (2)
constructive fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
April 04, 2022
Case Filing Date
October 15, 2021
Category
Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 08/01/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.