On January 11, 2022 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Glas Tavo Llc A California Limited Liability Company,
Valdivia Gustavo,
and
Edwards Matthew R,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/29/2022 01:58 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Vargas,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
CHRISTOPHER D. NISSEN, ESQ. (State Bar No. 202034)
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
555 S Flower St, Suite 2900, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2407
TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 443-5100 FAX NO. (Optional): (213) 443-5101
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): christopher.nissen@wilsonelser.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): GUSTAVO VALDIVIA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avennue
MAILING ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avennue
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chatsworth, CA 91311
BRANCH NAME: North Valley District, Chatsworth
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: GUSTAVO VALDIVIA
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: MATTHEW R. EDWARDS
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 22CHCV00021
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: July 13, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: F49 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Christopher D. Nissen
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): GUSTAVO VALDIVIA
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): 1/11/2022
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Breach of Contract, Negiigence, IIED, Declaratory Relief
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
June 29, 2022
Case Filing Date
January 11, 2022
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 09/19/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.