arrow left
arrow right
  • GUSTAVO VALDIVIA VS MATTHEW R EDWARDS Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • GUSTAVO VALDIVIA VS MATTHEW R EDWARDS Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/22/2022 04:50 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Reyna,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY CHRISTOPHER D. NISSEN, ESQ. (State Bar No. 202034) WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 555 S Flower St, Suite 2900, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2407 TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 443-5100 FAX NO. (Optional): (213) 443-5101 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): christopher.nissen@wilsonelser.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): GUSTAVO VALDIVIA; GLAS TAVO & ASSOCIATES, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avennue MAILING ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avennue CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chatsworth, CA 91311 BRANCH NAME: North Valley District, Chatsworth PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: GUSTAVO VALDIVIA, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: MATTHEW R. EDWARDS CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 22CHCV00021 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: October 6, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: F49 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Christopher D. Nissen INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): GUSTAVO VALDIVIA; GLAS TAVO & ASSOCIATES, LLC b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 1/11/2022 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Breach of Contract, Negiigence, IIED, Declaratory Relief Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov