On January 11, 2022 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Glas Tavo Llc A California Limited Liability Company,
Valdivia Gustavo,
and
Edwards Matthew R,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/27/2023 03:45 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Reyna,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Danny Ceron, Esq.
Ceron Law Office
1050 Lakes Dr., Ste. 225
West Covina, CA 91790
TELEPHONE NO.: 213-973-3040 FAX NO. (Optional): 626-608-3596
ceronlawoffice@gmail.com
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): MATTHEW R. EDWARDS (Defendant)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue
MAILING ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chatsworth, CA 91311
BRANCH NAME: Chatsworth Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: GLAS TAVO & ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: MATTHEW R. EDWARDS
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 22CHCV00021
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: March 10, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: F-49 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Danny Ceron, Counsel for Defendant
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): MATTHEW R. EDWARDS (Defendant)
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Breach of Contract, Negligence, IIED, Declaratory Relief
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
February 27, 2023
Case Filing Date
January 11, 2022
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 09/19/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.