arrow left
arrow right
  • GUSTAVO VALDIVIA VS MATTHEW R EDWARDS Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • GUSTAVO VALDIVIA VS MATTHEW R EDWARDS Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/27/2023 03:45 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Reyna,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Danny Ceron, Esq. Ceron Law Office 1050 Lakes Dr., Ste. 225 West Covina, CA 91790 TELEPHONE NO.: 213-973-3040 FAX NO. (Optional): 626-608-3596 ceronlawoffice@gmail.com E-MAIL ADDRESS: ATTORNEY FOR (Name): MATTHEW R. EDWARDS (Defendant) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue MAILING ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chatsworth, CA 91311 BRANCH NAME: Chatsworth Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: GLAS TAVO & ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: MATTHEW R. EDWARDS CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 22CHCV00021 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: March 10, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: F-49 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Danny Ceron, Counsel for Defendant INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): MATTHEW R. EDWARDS (Defendant) b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Breach of Contract, Negligence, IIED, Declaratory Relief Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov