On March 15, 2022 a 72226Notic007fc3 was filed involving a dispute between Arntsen Family Partnership, Lp, Arntsen, Robert, Brian Christopher Dunn Custodianship, Ho, John, Huang, Quanyu, Lee, Mary, and Black Horse Holdings, Llc, Bragg, David M, Caproc Iii, Llc, Davis, Gregory J, Huang, Quanyu, Huish, Dale, Justesen, Jason, Kludt, Kurtis Stuart, Mclan Trust, Monks Family Trust, Oneil, Scott, Paramont Capital, Llc, Paramont Woodside, Llc, Silicon Valley Real Ventures, Llc, Stoker, Diane, Stoker, Phil, Svrv 385 Moore, Llc, Svrv 387 Moore, Llc, Teh Capital, Llc, Wild Rose Irrevocable Trust, Wolfe, Kevin, Wz Partners Llc, for (16) Unlimited Fraud in the District Court of San Mateo County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO.: FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Robert Arntsen et al. 22-CIV-01148 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Gregory J. Davis et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hon. Robert D. Foiles DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 21 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: John Ho et al vs. David M. Bragg et al b. Case number: 23-CIV-01099 c. Court: same as above other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: 4 e. Case type: limited civil unlimited civil probate family law other (specify): f. Filing date: 3/10/2023 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Yes No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: pending dismissed with without prejudice disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: same as above other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE www.courtinfo.ca.gov CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] CM-015 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Robert Arntsen et al. CASE NUMBER: 22-CIV-01148 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Gregory J. Davis et al. 2. (continued) e. Case type: limited civil unlimited civil probate family law other (specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Yes No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h i. Status of case: pending dismissed with without prejudice disposed of by judgment 3. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: same as above other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: e. Case type: limited civil unlimited civil probate family law other (specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Yes No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 3h i. Status of case: pending dismissed with without prejudice disposed of by judgment 4. Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: ______ Date: March 10, 2023 Collin J. Vierra (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] Page 2 of 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE CM-015 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Robert Arntsen et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Gregory J. Davis et al. 22-CIV-01148 PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF RELATED CASE (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Related Case if you are a party in the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service. The notice must be served on all known parties in each related action or proceeding.) 1. I am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took place, and my residence or business address is (specify): 2. I served a copy of the Notice of Related Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with first-class postage fully prepaid and (check one): a. deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service. b. placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which I am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. 3. The Notice of Related Case was mailed: a. on (date): 3/10/2023 b. from (city and state): Chicago, IL 4. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows: a. Name of person served: c. Name of person served: Jessica Chong Street address: 1700 Lincoln St., Ste. 2000 Street address: City: Denver City: State and zip code: CO 80203 State and zip code: b. Name of person served: d. Name of person served: Ryan Van Steenis Street address: 1601 S. Shepherd Drive, Apt. Street address: City: Houston City: State and zip code: TX 77019 State and zip code: Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030(P).) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: 3/10/2023 Mina Al-Ansari (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT) CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] Page 3 of 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE