Document for ARNTSEN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP, et al vs. GREGORY J DAVIS, et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Ernesto F. Aldover (SBN 157625)
 1    RETZ & ALDOVER, LLP
      2550 Via Tejon, Suite 3A
 2    Palos Verdes Estates, California 90274
      (310) 540-9800 telephone
 3
      Jessica E. Chong (SBN 317869)
 4    Brian Zimmerman (admitted pro hac vice)
      Nicholas Reisch (admitted pro hac vice)
 5    SPENCER FANE LLP
      300 South Fourth Street, Suite 950
 6    Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
      (702) 408-3400 telephone
 7

 8    Attorneys for Defendants
      Gregory J. Davis, Paramont Woodside, LLC,
 9    Paramont Capital, LLC, SVRV 385 Moore, LLC, and
      SVRV 387 Moore, LLC
10
                       SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11

12                                       COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

13    Robert Arntsen; Mary Lee; Arntsen Family        Case No. 22-CIV-01148
      Partnership, LP; and Brian Christopher Dunn
14    Custodianship;                                  JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
                                                       FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
15                                 Plaintiffs,            PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED
                                                        COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
16              -vs-

17    David M. Bragg; Kurtis Stuart Kludt; Silicon
      Valley Real Ventures, LLC; SVRV 385 Moore,      Dept.: 21
18    LLC; SVRV 387 Moore, LLC; Gregory J.            Judge: The Honorable Foiles
      Davis; Paramont Woodside, LLC; and
19    Paramont Capital, LLC;

20                                     Defendants.

21

22
            Plaintiffs Robert Arnsten, Mary Lee, Arnsten Family Partnership, LP, and Brian
23
     Christopher Dunn Custodianship (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Gregory J. Davis, Paramont
24
     Woodside, LLC, Paramont Capital, LLC, SVRV 385 Moore, LLC and SVRV 387 Moore, LLC,
25
     Kevin Wolfe, and Jason Justesen (“Defendants”) by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby
26
     stipulate and agree as follows:
27

28
             WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on August 22, 2022;
 1
             WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants entered into a Stipulation on September 22, 2022
 2
     extending Defendants’ deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint to October 21, 2022,
 3
     given Plaintiffs’ intended to file a Second Amended Complaint on behalf of two additional
 4
     plaintiffs;
 5
             WHEREAS on February 20, 2023, Plaintiffs indicated that the bankruptcy action of co-
 6
     defendant David M. Bragg impeded Plaintiffs’ ability to file a Second Amended Complaint;
 7
     therefore, Plaintiffs would file a separate complaint on behalf of the additional plaintiffs;
 8
             WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants misunderstood each other’s intent, with Plaintiffs no
 9
     longer intending to file a Second Amended Complaint as of February 20, 2023, but Defendants
10
     believing that Plaintiffs intended to file a Second Amended Complaint in addition to a separate
11
     complaint on behalf of the additional plaintiffs;
12
             WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a Request for Default on March 3, 2023;
13
             WHEREAS Defendants learned of the Request for Default on March 7, 2023 through co-
14
     defendants’ counsel;
15
             WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants reached an agreement that Defendants will have up
16
     to and until March 22, 2023 to file and serve a Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint;
17
             NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate and agree that Defendants’
18
     deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint shall be March 22, 2023, and if the
19
     court clerk enters a default prior to March 22, 2023, then Plaintiffs agree that Defendants should
20
     have relief from the default, provided that the Demurrer is filed by March 22, 2023; Defendants
21
     shall have relief from any default entered against them.
22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Dated this 9th day of March, 2023.              Dated this 9th day of March, 2023.
 1
      EIMER STAHL LLP                                 SPENCER FANE LLP
 2
      /s/ Collin J. Vierra                            /s/ Jessica E. Chong
 3    Collin J. Vierra                                Jessica E. Chong (SBN 317869)
      99 S. Almaden Blvd., Suite 600                  Brian Zimmerman (admitted pro hac vice)
 4    San Jose, CA 95113                              Nicholas Reisch (admitted pro hac vice)
      Attorneys for Plaintiff                         300 South Fourth Street, Suite 950
 5                                                    Las Vegas, NV 89101
 6                                                    and
 7                                                    Ernesto F. Aldover, Esq.
                                                      RETZ & ALDOVER, LLP
 8                                                    2550 Via Tejon, Suite 3A
                                                      Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274
 9
                                                      Attorneys for Defendants SVRV 385 Moore
10                                                    LLC, SVRV 387 LLC Moore LLC Gregory J.
                                                      Davis; Paramont Woodside, LLC; Paramont
11                                                    Capital, LLC; Kevin Wolfe; and Jason
                                                      Justesen
12

13
                                                ORDER
14
            Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO
15
     ORDERED.
16
            DATED:
17
                                                 ____________________________________
18                                               THE HONORABLE ROBERT D. FOILES

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28