arrow left
arrow right
  • CHRISTINA ARLINGTON SMITH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO LALANI WALTON, DECEASED, ET AL. VS TIKTOK INC., ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CHRISTINA ARLINGTON SMITH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO LALANI WALTON, DECEASED, ET AL. VS TIKTOK INC., ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
                                           COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
COURTHOUSE ADDRESS:

Spring Street Courthouse
312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:                                                                                  CASE NUMBER


                                                                 22STCV21355
CHRISTINA ARLINGTON SMITH individually and as successor-in-interest to LALANI WALTON, Decease
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
                                                                                                   DEPARTMENT/UNIT

TIKTOK INC., et al.                                                                          12
                                                                                                   TELEPHONE NUMBER
                    NOTICE OF REJECTION – PLEADINGS


We are unable to process your    complaint/petition      answer/response   general denial    amended
complaint       cross-complaint ✔ other: ___________________________
                                         Notice of Order Coordination                01/09/2023
                                                                        submitted on __________________
for the following reason(s):

1.        The required fee of $ _____________ was not submitted.

2.        Check enclosed in the amount of $_________________ is               altered      unsigned.

3.        The document does not comply with California Rules of Court, rule 2.100.

4.        The case number        is missing     does not correspond to our records.

5.        The      attorney of record     attorney’s address does not correspond to our records.

6.        Summons must conform exactly to the caption of the complaint.

7.        According to the zip code listed in the Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location, this
          case must be filed at the ___________________________________ Courthouse.

8.        The    plaintiff  defendant attorney of record address has P.O. Box only. Any address including a
          P.O. Box must include a street address.

9.        Based upon the prayer amount indicated, this case must be filed as a          Limited   Unlimited
          Jurisdiction matter.

10.       Proof of service of cross-complaint on all parties who have appeared on this case is required.

11.       Reclassification fee of $ ________________ is required with filling of   cross-complaint          amended
                 complaint, as this document is changing the jurisdiction of the case.

12.       A court order is required in order to file this   cross-complaint      amended complaint.

13.       The clerk cannot accept any discovery for filing.

             Represented litigants are required to electronically file documents with the court through an approved EFSP
14. ✔ Other: ______________________________________________________________________________

                                                                David W. Slayton, Executive Officer / Clerk of Court

         01/11/2023
Dated: ___________________                                        J. Lara
                                                              By: __________________________________________
                                                                                  Deputy Clerk

LACIV 001 (Rev. 02/16)
LASC Approved 07-04                     NOTICE OF REJECTION - PLEADINGS
For Optional Use