On December 21, 2020 a
Exhibit,Appendix
was filed
involving a dispute between
Yasemin Tekiner,
Yasemin Tekiner
In Her Individual Capacity, As A Beneficiary And A Trustee Of The Yasemin Tekiner 2011 Descendants Trust And Derivatively As A Holder Of Equitable Interests In A Shareholder Or A Member Of The Company Defendants,
and
254-258 W. 35Th St. Llc,
Berrin Tekiner,
Billur Akipek
In Her Capacity As A Trustee Of The Yasemin Tekiner 2011 Descendants Trust,
Bremen House Inc.,
Bremen House Texas, Inc.,
German News Company, Inc.,
German News Texas, Inc.,
Gonca Tekiner,
Zeynep Tekiner,
for Commercial Division
in the District Court of New York County.
Preview
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/2022 06:01 PM INDEX NO. 657193/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 908 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2022
EXHIBIT E
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/2022 06:01 PM INDEX NO. 657193/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 908 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2022
Meghan E. Hill
Direct Tel: 212-326-0808
Direct Fax: 212-326-0806
MHill@PRYORCASHMAN.com
November 1, 2022
VIA EMAIL
Michele Kahn, Esq.
Kahn & Goldberg, LLP
555 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, NY 10017
mk@kahngoldberg.com
Re: Tekiner v. Bremen House Inc. et al., Index No. 657193/2020
Dear Michele:
During the deposition of Zeynep Tekiner (“Zeynep”), we made several requests for the
production of documents, which you agreed to “take under advisement.” We have not heard
back from you regarding these requests.
Therefore, we renew our demand for the production of the following documents, based
on your client’s deposition testimony:
Bank statements in Zeynep’s possession from the time period Zeynep was living in
Turkey showing that Berrin was regularly sending money to Zeynep and at some point
cut the amount of money she was sending “in half.” Zeynep was not sure of the amount.
She suggested it was between $10,000 and $5,000 per month. (Z. Tekiner Tr. 218:2-14.)
Documents in Zeynep’s possession showing that Extell at one time made an expression
of interest at “either [$]70 or $80 million” for the Extell properties. (Z. Tekiner Tr.
358:10-359:5.)
Documents in Zeynep’s possession that would identify the properties she was referring to
when she alleged, at ¶ 82 of her First Amended Verified Complaint in Intervention (Dkt.
371), that “comparable properties in the nearby neighborhood have recently sold for
much higher prices [than the Extell properties did].” (Z. Tekiner Tr. 359: 7-360:8.)
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/2022 06:01 PM INDEX NO. 657193/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 908 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2022
Michele Kahn, Esq.
November 1, 2022
Page 2
We demand that Zeynep either produce the documents described above or state in writing
that no such documents exist by this Friday, November 4, 2022.
We also note that you have provided no response to the letter we sent on October 24,
2022 to you and your co-counsel, Scott Parker, specifically regarding the production of text
messages that were discussed during Zeynep’s deposition. We request the courtesy of a response
to that letter. Defendants reserve all rights and remedies, none of which are hereby waived.
Very truly yours,
Meghan E. Hill
cc: All Counsel of Record (via email)
Document Filed Date
December 14, 2022
Case Filing Date
December 21, 2020
Category
Commercial Division
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.