On December 21, 2020 a
Exhibit,Appendix
was filed
involving a dispute between
Yasemin Tekiner,
Yasemin Tekiner
In Her Individual Capacity, As A Beneficiary And A Trustee Of The Yasemin Tekiner 2011 Descendants Trust And Derivatively As A Holder Of Equitable Interests In A Shareholder Or A Member Of The Company Defendants,
and
254-258 W. 35Th St. Llc,
Berrin Tekiner,
Billur Akipek
In Her Capacity As A Trustee Of The Yasemin Tekiner 2011 Descendants Trust,
Bremen House Inc.,
Bremen House Texas, Inc.,
German News Company, Inc.,
German News Texas, Inc.,
Gonca Tekiner,
Zeynep Tekiner,
for Commercial Division
in the District Court of New York County.
Preview
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/05/2022 11:46 AM INDEX NO. 657193/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 738 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/05/2022
EXHIBIT 10
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/05/2022 11:46 AM INDEX NO. 657193/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 738 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/05/2022
Writer’s Direct Contact:
908.333.6220 (Tel.)
PARKER IBRAHIM & BERG LLP 212.596.7036 (Fax)
scott.parker@piblaw.com
www.piblaw.com
September 19, 2022
VIA E-MAIL
Meghan E. Hill
Pryor Cashman LLP
7 Times Square
New York, New York 10036-6569
Re: Yasemin Tekiner, et al. v. Bremen House Inc., et al.
Index No.: 657193/2020
Dear Meghan:
I write with respect to the Court’s August 17, 2022 order, which granted in part Plaintiff
Yasemin Tekiner’s motion to compel “to the extent that Defendants’ categorical assertion of
privilege with respect to corporate business-related documents is overly broad.” (NYSCEF Doc.
No. 680). Although that order is now a month old, you have not yet produced any documents in
compliance with the Court’s order. We raised this issue during our meet-and-confer on September
6, and you said that Defendants would be willing to consider producing these documents to us on
a rolling basis – an arrangement to which we agreed. Defendants, however, still failed to produce
a single document after our meet-and-confer.
On September 13, 2022, we wrote to you to follow up on your failure, and asked you to
confirm exactly when you would: (1) begin your rolling production; and (2) complete your rolling
production. Once again, you ignored us completely.
In light of your month-long, willful disregard of the Court’s order, this is to advise you
that, if you do not produce the entire set of responsive documents to us by Tuesday, September
20 at 2 pm, we will contact the Court to advise as your contempt of this order.
Very truly yours,
Scott W. Parker
cc: Stephen P. Younger, Esq. (via e-mail)
Michele Kahn, Esq. (via e-mail)
New York Office: 5 Penn Plaza, Suite 2371 – New York, New York 10001 – 212.596.7037
New Jersey Office: 270 Davidson Avenue – Somerset, New Jersey 08873 – 908.725.9700
BOSTON – NEW JERSEY – NEW YORK – ORANGE COUNTY – PHILADELPHIA
Document Filed Date
October 05, 2022
Case Filing Date
December 21, 2020
Category
Commercial Division
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.