arrow left
arrow right
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
						
                                

Preview

Joseph Whittington, Esq. SBN: 295516 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES 1128 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (661) 323-1400 (661) 323-0132 Alan Scott Hair, Plaintiff KERN 1415 Truxtun Avenue 1415 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, 93301 Metro Division Alan Scott Hair and Mary Charles Hair 3MB, LLC., et al. BCV-18-100592 X December 13, 2022 March 18, 2018 Mandatory Settlement Conference X December 21, 2022 10:30 AM 1 X January 23, 2023 9:00 AM 17 December 14, 2022 Joseph Whittington, Esq. X Alan Scott Hair and Mary Charles Hair BCV-18-100592 3MB, LLC., et al. 1128 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, CA Katia Ramos 1 Alan Hair, et al. v. CITA Development, Inc., et al. Kern County Superior Court Case No.: BCV-18-100592 2 3 PROOF OF SERVICE 4 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN 6 I am employed in the County of Kern, State of California. I am over the age of 18 7 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1128 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California 93301 8 9 On December 14, 2022, I served the foregoing document described as follows: PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 10 11 X by placing the true copies thereof by placing the original 12 13 addressed as follows: SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST. 14 X BY EMAIL OR ELECTRONIC FILING/SERVICE - Based upon a court order, 15 local Rules of Court, or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic 16 transmission, I caused the documents to be sent/electronically served to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed. (C.C.P. § 1010.6 and CRC § 2.251) 17 18 BY MAIL - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope and caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Bakersfield, California. The envelope was mailed 19 with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am “readily familiar” with this firm’s practice of 20 collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 21 motion of party, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter 22 date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing affidavit. 23 BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope 24 and caused it to be deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained by the express 25 service carrier, or delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized by the express service carrier to receive documents, in an envelope or package designated by the express 26 service carrier with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to the person on whom it 27 is to be served, at the office address as last given by that person. 28 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROOF OF SEVICE -1- 1 BY FACSIMILE - I caused such document to be transmitted to a facsimile machine 2 maintained by the person on whom it is served at the facsimile machine telephone number as last given by that person. 3 4 BY PERSONAL SERVICE - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope and caused it to be delivered by hand to the offices of the addressee(s). 5 6 Executed on December 14, 2022, at Bakersfield, California. 7 X (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 8 California that the above is true and correct. 9 10 11 ____________________________ KATIA RAMOS 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROOF OF SEVICE -2- 1 SERVICE LIST 2 Mary E. Ashcraft, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants/Cross- 3 Elizabeth A. Thomasian, Esq. Complainants: 4 CHURCH LAW GROUP, INC. 3MB, LLC and Robert E. Bell 802 West Pinedale Avenue, Suite 104 5 Fresno, CA 93711 6 eservice@churh-law.com 7 mashcraft@church-law.com ethomasian@church-law.com 8 mlujan@church-law.com 9 10 Jody Steinberg, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant: Nicholas S. Walls, Esq. Juicy Burger Corporation and 11 Hanger, Steinberg, Shapiro & Ash, ALC Mohamed Muthana, Jr. 12 LOS ANGELES • Inland Empire • Bakersfield 13 21031 Ventura Blvd, Suite 800, 14 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 15 direct (818) 206-0216 nsw@hssalaw.com 16 js@hssalaw.com 17 18 Nathan M. Hodges, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant: Hodges Law Group Treble LLC 19 1925 G Street 20 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Nathan@hodges-lawgroup.com 21 kelly@hodges-lawgroup.com 22 23 CITA Development, Inc. 24 1201 24th Street, Ste. 210 Bakersfield, CA 93301 25 26 27 28 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROOF OF SEVICE -3-