On August 20, 2009 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Fetter, Elizabeth,
Rudin, Alexa,
Rudin, Ethan,
Friedman, Barbara,
Hill & Co(Sued Erroneously As Hill & Company,
Post, Malcolm,
and
Does 1 Through 49,
Does 1 Through 50,
Does 1 To 25,
Does 2 -25,
Elizabeth Fetter,
Friedman, Barbara,
Hill & Co., A California Corporation,
Hill & Company Real Estate,
Hill & Co(Sued Erroneously As Hill & Company,
Post, Malcolm,
Post, Malcolm James,
The Estate Of Malcolm Post,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
DOOM
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Aug-11-2010 11:32 am
Case Number: CGC-09-491673
Filing Date: Aug-11-2010 11:31
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02936895
‘ ORDER
ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al
001002936895
instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Roeca Haas Hager LLP
351 California St., Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94104
415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988.
RUSSELL S. ROECA (State Bar # 97297)
EDWARD D. HAAS (State Bar # 76647)
SHANNON L. ERNSTER (State Bar # 264940)
ROECA HAAS HAGER LLP
351 California Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94104 AUG 1 1 2010
Telephone: (415) 352-0980
Facsimile: (415) 352-0988
San Francisco County Superior Court
CLERK OF THE COURT
BY; a
puty Cle
Attorneys for Defendants HILL & CO., BARBARA
FRIEDMAN, AND MALCOLM POST
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
(Unlimited Jurisdiction)
ALEXA RUDIN AND ETHAN RUDIN Case No. CGC-09-491673
Plaintiffs [PROPOSEDLORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT HILL & CO.’S REQUEST
vs. TO CORRECT ITS NAME ON THE
PLEADINGS
HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE,
BARBARA FRIEDMAN, MALCOLM (Cal. Rules of Court, Rules 3.1200, et seq.)
POST, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Date:
Defendants. Time: 11:00 a.m.
Dept.: 266-301
Judge: Hon. Fok, t-aobride Ricadk, sh
Action Filed: August 20, 2009
Trial Date: | September 22, 2010
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that defendant
HILL & CO., sued erroneously in this action as Hill & Company Real Estate, be permitted to
correct its name on the pleadings.
It is also ordered that defendant HILL & CO. may answer the first amended complaint and
file its cross-complaint, pursuant to stipulation, as HILL & CO., instead of Hill & Company Real
Estate.
H/1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE HILL & CO.’§ REQUEST TO CORRECT ITS NAME
Case No. CGC-09-491673Roeca Haas Hager LLP
351 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104
415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988
IT IS SO ORDERED.
| Dated: Aust }{_, 2010 [te
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
PETER J. BUSCH
GAHil! & Co\1533 Beach\Pleadings\Ex Parte App re name change.doc
Cos #44! 673
Raden “8 Ki L/ x Co
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE HILL & CO.’S REQUEST TO CORRECT ITS NAME
Case No. CGC-09-491673IOI
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Aug-11-2010 11:32 am
Case Number: CGC-09-491673
Filing Date: Aug-11-2010 11:31
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02936895
! ORDER
ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al
001C02936895
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Roeca Haas Hager LLP
n Francisco, CA 94104
415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988
351 California St.. Suite 900,
x a
oo
RUSSELL S. ROECA (State Bar # 97297)
EDWARD D. HAAS (State Bar # 76647)
SHANNON L. ERNSTER (State Bar # 264940)
ROECA HAAS HAGER LLP
351 California Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 352-0980
Facsimile: (415) 352-0988
Attorneys for Defendants HILL & CO., BARBARA
FRIEDMAN, AND MALCOLM POST
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
(Unlimited Jurisdiction)
ALEXA RUDIN AND ETHAN RUDIN
Plaintiffs
vs.
HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE,
BARBARA FRIEDMAN, MALCOLM
POST, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that defendant
HILL & CO., sued erroneously in this action as Hill & Company Real Estate, be permitted to
correct its name on the pleadings.
It is also ordered that defendant HILL & CO. may answer the first amended complaint and
file its cross-complaint, pursuant to stipulation, as HILL & CO., instead of Hill & Company Real
Estate.
///
San Francisco Cownty Superior Court
AUG 11 2010
CLERK OF THE COURT
By. puty Cle
Case No. CGC-09-491673
[PROPOSED].ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT HILL & CO.’S REQUEST
TO CORRECT ITS NAME ON THE
PLEADINGS
(Cal. Rules of Court, Rules 3.1200, et seq.)
Date:
Time: 11:00 a.m.
Dept.: 266-201
Judge: Hon. Jamest-MeBride Riche, sh
Action Filed: August 20, 2009
Trial Date: | September 22, 2010
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE HILL & CO.’S REQUEST TO CORRECT ITS NAME
Case No, CGC-09-491673Roeca Haas Hager LLP
351 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104
415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Y
JUDGE OF af SUPERIOR COURT
PETER J. BUSCH
Dated: Chou )I , 2010
GAHill & Co\1533 Beach\Pleadings\Ex Parte App re name change.doc
Cose 4d! 673
Raden €8 M1 / x ©
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE HILL & CO.’S REQUEST TO CORRECT ITS NAME
Case No. CGC-09-49 1673