On August 20, 2009 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Fetter, Elizabeth,
Rudin, Alexa,
Rudin, Ethan,
Friedman, Barbara,
Hill & Co(Sued Erroneously As Hill & Company,
Post, Malcolm,
and
Does 1 Through 49,
Does 1 Through 50,
Does 1 To 25,
Does 2 -25,
Elizabeth Fetter,
Friedman, Barbara,
Hill & Co., A California Corporation,
Hill & Company Real Estate,
Hill & Co(Sued Erroneously As Hill & Company,
Post, Malcolm,
Post, Malcolm James,
The Estate Of Malcolm Post,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
AVM
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Sep-20-2011 11:48 am
Case Number: CGC-09-491673
Filing Date: Sep-20-2011 11:47
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03331731
ORDER
ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al
001C03331731
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.ZACKS & UTRECHT, P.C.
235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 400
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
w
Co we NX
10
1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ANDREW M. ZACKS (147794)
ANTHONY C. SOLDATO (260794)
ZACKS & UTRECHT, P.C.
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: (415) 956-8100
Attorneys for Cross-Defendant
ELIZABETH FETTER
EI LED
‘County ransigco
SEP & 0 201!
CLERWQOF THE COURT
By: sn
eputy Clark
SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
ALEXA RUDIN AND ETHAN RUDIN,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
HILL & CO., etal.
Defendants.
HILL & CO., et al.
Cross-Complainants,
vs.
ELIZABETH FETTER, et al.
Cross-Defendants.
ELIZABETH FETTER, et al.
Plaintiff,
vs.
HILL & CO., et al.
Defendants.
Case No.: CGC-09-491673
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE
AND REOPENING DISCOVERY
Consolidated with
Case No. CGC-11-509013
1
ORDER CONTINUING THE TRIAL DATE AND REOPENING DISCOVERY Case No. CGC-09-491673ZACKS & UTRECHT, P.C.
235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 400
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
_~ ™~
On August 23, 2011 in Department 206 of this Court, plaintiff/cross-defendant
Elizabeth Fetter’s motion for an order continuing the trial to a time to be determined by
the Court and an order reopening discovery for all purposes came on regularly for hearing.
Andrew M. Zacks and Anthony C. Soldato appeared on behalf of the moving party and
plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter. Rod Divelbiss appeared on behalf of plaintiffs
Alexa and Ethan Rudin. Ed Haas appeared on behalf of defendants/cross-complainants
Hill & Co., Barbara Friedman, and the Estate of Malcolm Post.
The Court having reviewed the parties’ papers, and finding GOOD CAUSE hereby
ORDERS: plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter’s motion for an order continuing the
trial and reopening discovery for all purposes is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the trial date of October 3, 2011 is continued
to December 5, 2011 in Department 206 at 9:30 a.m. The current settlement conference of
September 16, 2011 at 9:00 am in Department 608 shall remain as scheduled. The
discovery cut-offs shall track the new trial date. The requests for judicial notice are
GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated, SEP'20 2011 2 “Wanrka
ib Judge of the SatYFrancisco Superior Court os )
MAPLA J. MILLER
SEE EXHIBIT “A” RE
COMPLIANCE WITH CRC 3.1312
2
ORDER CONTINUING THE TRIAL DATE AND REOPENING DISCOVERY Case No. CGC-09-491673oo ~ ~
ZACKS & UTRECHT 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94104
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Telephone (415) 956-8100
Facsimile (415) 288-9755
www2zulpe.com
September 7, 2011
Via hand delivery
Hon. Katherine Feinstein
Presiding Judge
Department 206
San Francisco Superior Court
400 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102-4514
RE: Rudin vs. Hill & Co., et al.
San Francisco Sup. Ct. Case No. CGC-09-491673
(Consolidated with Case No. CGC-11-509013)
Dear Judge Feinstein:
We represent the plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter in the above-titled case. I am writing in
regards to plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter’s Motion to Continue the Trial Date and
Reopening Discovery. The motion was heard on August 23, 2011 in Department 206.
] did not receive responses from opposing counsel after my service of the proposed order. Pursuant
to CRC Rule 3.1312, I am submitting the enclosed “Order Granting Motion to Continue the Trial
Date and Reopening Discovery.”
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ZACKS & UTRECHT, P.C.
Anthony C. Soldato
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Elizabeth Fetter
encls
cc: Rod Divelbiss (via fax)
—_— Wi LIGIHx3
Document Filed Date
September 20, 2011
Case Filing Date
August 20, 2009
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
AVM SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Sep-20-2011 11:48 am Case Number: CGC-09-491673 Filing Date: Sep-20-2011 11:47 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03331731 ORDER ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al 001C03331731 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.ZACKS & UTRECHT, P.C. 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 w Co we NX 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW M. ZACKS (147794) ANTHONY C. SOLDATO (260794) ZACKS & UTRECHT, P.C. 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 956-8100 Attorneys for Cross-Defendant ELIZABETH FETTER EI LED ‘County ransigco SEP & 0 201! CLERWQOF THE COURT By: sn eputy Clark SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION ALEXA RUDIN AND ETHAN RUDIN, Plaintiffs, vs. HILL & CO., etal. Defendants. HILL & CO., et al. Cross-Complainants, vs. ELIZABETH FETTER, et al. Cross-Defendants. ELIZABETH FETTER, et al. Plaintiff, vs. HILL & CO., et al. Defendants. Case No.: CGC-09-491673 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE AND REOPENING DISCOVERY Consolidated with Case No. CGC-11-509013 1 ORDER CONTINUING THE TRIAL DATE AND REOPENING DISCOVERY Case No. CGC-09-491673ZACKS & UTRECHT, P.C. 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 _~ ™~ On August 23, 2011 in Department 206 of this Court, plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter’s motion for an order continuing the trial to a time to be determined by the Court and an order reopening discovery for all purposes came on regularly for hearing. Andrew M. Zacks and Anthony C. Soldato appeared on behalf of the moving party and plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter. Rod Divelbiss appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Alexa and Ethan Rudin. Ed Haas appeared on behalf of defendants/cross-complainants Hill & Co., Barbara Friedman, and the Estate of Malcolm Post. The Court having reviewed the parties’ papers, and finding GOOD CAUSE hereby ORDERS: plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter’s motion for an order continuing the trial and reopening discovery for all purposes is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the trial date of October 3, 2011 is continued to December 5, 2011 in Department 206 at 9:30 a.m. The current settlement conference of September 16, 2011 at 9:00 am in Department 608 shall remain as scheduled. The discovery cut-offs shall track the new trial date. The requests for judicial notice are GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Dated, SEP'20 2011 2 “Wanrka ib Judge of the SatYFrancisco Superior Court os ) MAPLA J. MILLER SEE EXHIBIT “A” RE COMPLIANCE WITH CRC 3.1312 2 ORDER CONTINUING THE TRIAL DATE AND REOPENING DISCOVERY Case No. CGC-09-491673oo ~ ~ ZACKS & UTRECHT 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94104 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Telephone (415) 956-8100 Facsimile (415) 288-9755 www2zulpe.com September 7, 2011 Via hand delivery Hon. Katherine Feinstein Presiding Judge Department 206 San Francisco Superior Court 400 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102-4514 RE: Rudin vs. Hill & Co., et al. San Francisco Sup. Ct. Case No. CGC-09-491673 (Consolidated with Case No. CGC-11-509013) Dear Judge Feinstein: We represent the plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter in the above-titled case. I am writing in regards to plaintiff/cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter’s Motion to Continue the Trial Date and Reopening Discovery. The motion was heard on August 23, 2011 in Department 206. ] did not receive responses from opposing counsel after my service of the proposed order. Pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1312, I am submitting the enclosed “Order Granting Motion to Continue the Trial Date and Reopening Discovery.” Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ZACKS & UTRECHT, P.C. Anthony C. Soldato Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Elizabeth Fetter encls cc: Rod Divelbiss (via fax) —_— Wi LIGIHx3