arrow left
arrow right
  • ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

AVC A SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Dec-16-2011 3:38 pm Case Number: CGC-09-491673 Filing Date: Aug-05-2011 3:34 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03424029 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER/NOTICE OF RULING FILED ALEXA RUDIN et al VS. HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE et al 001003424029 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Rocca Haas Hager LLP 351 California St., Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94104 415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988 cou wm ND RUSSELL S. ROECA (State Bar # 97297) EDWARD D. HAAS (State Bar # 76647) SHANNON L. ERNSTER (State Bar # 264940) ROECA HAAS HAGER LLP 351 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 San Fran Telephone: (415) 352-0980 ‘C0 County Superior Court Facsimile: (415) 352-0988 AUG 5~ 2o11 Attorneys for Defendants HILL & CO, (sued erroneously as HILL & COMPANY REAL By: CLERK OF TH ‘OURT ESTATE); BARBARA FRIEDMAN, and , MALCOLM JAMES POST, Personal Representative Clerk of the Estate of A. Malcolm Post, Jr. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Unlimited Jurisdiction) ALEXA RUDIN and ETHAN RUDIN, Case No. CGC-09-491673 and Case No. CGC- 11-509013 (Consolidated) Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER vs. DENYING CROSS-DEFENDANT ELIZABETH FETTER’S MOTION TO STRIKE PARTS OF THE FIRST AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE, BARBARA FRIEDMAN, MALCOLM. POST, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. Date: August 4, 2011 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 301 Judge: Hon. Peter J. Busch Action Filed: August 20, 2009 AND RELATED ACTIONS. Trial Date: | October 3, 2011 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING FETTER’S MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. CGC-09-491673 and Case No. CGC-11-509013 (Consolidate) R | 6 | N A |Roeca Haas Hager LLP 351 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988 oo oo TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Notice is hereby given that on August 4, 2011, the Honorable Peter J. Busch of the above- entitled court entered an order denying cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter’s motion to strike parts of the first amended cross-complaint. A true and correct copy of the order is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Dated: August 7, 2011 ROECA S HAGER LL By : Ww Edward D. Haas Shannon L. Ernster Attorneys for Defendants and Cross- Complainants HILL & CO. (sued erroneously as Hill & Company Real Estate), BARBARA FRIEDMAN and MALCOLM JAMES POST, Personal Representative of the Estate of A. Malcolm Post, Jr GAHill & Co\1533 Beach\Pleadings\Opposition. Motion to Strike, Notice of entry. doc 2 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING FETTER’S MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. CGC-09-491673 and Case No. CGC-11-509013 (Consolidated)CRoeca Haas Hager LLP 351 California St., Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94104 415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988 RUSSELL S. ROECA (State Bar #97297) EDWARD D. HAAS (State Bar ## 76647) ENDORSED SHANNON L. ERNSTER (State Bar # 264940) ROECA HAAS HAGER LLP 351 California Street, Suite 900 AUG - 4 2011 San Francisco, CA 94104 FIL San Francisco County Superior Court Telephone: (415) 352-0980 CLERK OF THE Facsimile: (415) 352-0988 BY: GINA GONZALES AT Deputy Clerk ~ Attorneys for Defendants HILL & CO. (sued erroneously as HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE); BARBARA FRIEDMAN, and MALCOLM JAMES POST, Special Administrator of the Estate of A. Malcolm Post, Jr. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Unlimited Jurisdiction) ALEXA RUDIN and ETHAN RUDIN, Case No. CGC-09-491673 and Case No. CGC- 11-509013 (Consolidated) Plaintiffs, [PROEPOSED] ORDER DENYING CROSS- vs. DEFENDANT ELIZABETH FETTER’S MOTION TO STRIKE PARTS OF THE HILL & COMPANY REAL ESTATE, FIRST AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT BARBARA FRIEDMAN, MALCOLM POST, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Date: August 4, 2011 Defendants. Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 301 Judge: Hon. Peter J. Busch Action Filed: August 20, 2009 AND RELATED ACTIONS. Trial Date: October 3, 2011 On August 4, 2011, in Department 301 of this Court, cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter moved the court for an order striking parts of the first amended cross-complaint of defendants and cross-complainants Hill & Co., Barbara Friedman, and Malcolm James Post, formerly Special Administrator and now Personal Representative of the Estate of A. Malcolm Post, Jr. (collectively “Hill”). On August 3, 2011, the Court issued its Tentative Ruling denying the motion. No party [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING FETTER’S MOTION TO STRIKE A Case No. CGC-09-491673 and Case No. CGC-11-509013 (Consolif XH] BITRoeca Haas Hager LLP 351 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988 Co mem ND WH RF Bw NY YM NR YN YN NY NY NY Be Be we ewe ee ee ee ao KN DOD UW F&F BW NY & DBD OO HD DR Hh eR BD BY Fe GS notified the court or counsel that they intended to contest the Tentative Ruling, thus it became the Court’s order. The Court, having read and considered the moving and opposing papers and supporting declarations, and having heard the argument of counsel, and failing to find good cause, hereby orders that cross-defendant Elizabeth Fetter’s Motion to Strike Parts of the First Amended Cross- Complaint is DENIED. No purpose would be served by delaying the entry of the proper party. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: __pue A _og# 2047 PETER J. BUSCH JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT GAHil! & Co\1533 Beach\Pleadings\Opposition. Motion to Strike, prop order, doc 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING FETTER’S MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. CGC-09-491673 and Case No. CGC-11-509013 (Consolidated)Roeca Haas Hager LLP 351 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 415.352.0980 Fax 415.352.0988 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Peter Korcsinszky, hereby declare: I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to or interested in the within entitled cause. I am an employee of Roeca Haas Hager LLP and my business address is 351 California Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94104. On the date stated below, I served a true copy of: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING CROSS-DEFENDANT ELIZABETH FETTER’S MOTION TO STRIKE PARTS OF THE FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT (X) By mail, by placing said document(s) in an envelope addressed as shown below. J am readily familiar with my firm’s practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Said correspondence will be deposited with the United States Postal Service this same day in the ordinary course of business. I sealed said envelope and placed it for collection and mailing on the date stated below to the addressee stated below, following the firm’s ordinary business practices. Rod Divelbiss Andrew M. Zacks Collette, Erickson, Farmer & O’Neill LLP = Zacks & Utrecht 235 Pine Street, Suite 1300 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94104 San Francisco, CA. 94104 I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed at San Francisco, California on August 4, 2011. Ee ° Peter Kordsinszky 3 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING FETTER’S MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. CGC-09-491673 and Case No. CGC-11-509013 (Consolidated)