On February 25, 2008 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Callahan, Nancy,
and
Carmel Mission Partnership Aka Heather Glen Court,
Does 1 Through 25, Inclusive,
Goya, Bradley,
Goya, Donna,
Goya, Elizabeth,
Goya, Elizabeth Ann,
Goya, Rod,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
NAO ACDUU ON
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jul-28-2009 11:09 am
Case Number: CGC-08-472530.
Filing Date: Jul-28-2009 11:09
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02568091
ORDER
NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al
001002568091
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.my ~
L. Jay Pedersen - 127791
Joshua N. Rosen - 201090
H, Paul Elstratis - 242373
BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIESTEL, PEDERSEN & TREPPA LLP
601 California Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) 981-5411
Facsimile: (415) 981-0352
Attorneys for Defendanis
ROD GOYA and CARMEL MISSION ad
PARTNERSHIP; AKA HEATHER GLEN COURT BY.
Specially Appearing Defendants
DONNA GOYA, RLIZABETH GOYA, BRADLEY
GOYA
SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
NANCY CALLAHAN, ) Case No. CGC-08-472530
)
Plaintiff, ) PROPOSED] ORDER QUASHING
) SERVICE OF SUMMONS
vs. )
)
ROD GOYA; CARMEL MISSION ) Complaint Filed: July 31, 2007
PARTNERSHIP; AKA HEATHER GLEN } Trial Date: November 2, 2009
COURT, and DOES | through 25, )
Inclusive, ) Date: June 23, 2009
) Time: 9:30 a.m.
Detendants, ) Dept: 302
)
)
)
The motion of specially appearing defendants Dorma Goya, Beth Goya, and Bradley
Goya for an order quashing service of summons came on for hearing in Department 302 of
this Court on June 23, 2009, No party contested the tentative tuling.
The Court’s Tentative Ruling was as follows:
Sei for hearing on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, line 11, DEFENDANTS DONNA GOYA,
BRADLEY GOYA, ELIZABETH GOYA'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER QUASHING SIER VICE OF SUMMONS“" ‘ ~
SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS IS Granted. No Opposition filed.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the court’s tenlative ruling is adopted.
Approved as to form.
EXHIBIT “A” RE
DOWUANCE WITH CRO 3.1312
Dated:
Kathleen P. Clack, Esq.
Law Offices of Kathleen P, Clack
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: SUL 27 2009 (Mankebsi\,.'\ then.
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
SHARLOTTE WALTER WooLaRn ~
[PROPOSED] ORDER QUASHING SERVICE OF SUMMONSdune 30, 2009
San Francisco Superior Court
CLERK — DEPARTMENT 302
400 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
Re: CALLAHAN v. GOYA, e¢ al.
San Francisco County Superior Court Case No.: CGC08 472530
Our File No.: SFBO2-07196
Dear Clerk of the Court:
Enclosed please find the defendants’ [Proposed] Order Quashing Service of Summons in
the above reference-matter. On June 24, 2009, we mailed the enclosed Order to opposing
counsel, As of today, June 30, 2009, no response has been received. We respectfully request
that the Judge sign the order and return it to us for service on the parties. Thank you for your
attention io this matter.
Very truly yours,
BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIKSTEL,
PEDERSEN & TREPPA LLP
HY Paul Efstratis
HPE/ame
Enclosure
ec: Kathleen Clack, Iisq.
Harold Jaffe, Esq. EXH | B IT "A"
RicaNDS, DIESTEL — Cammesestavmts 1 Causa SITET
[Jay Perenstn Enewit dame 18" Foon
danees Af TOPPA W.Pan-tromeers SAN PraNvewca
POTuR J. Yan ZANDT
AUSON Mf CRANE a ‘Catan 9919-2805
Woranronn Reemscn Bermres¥.TA (415)981-8410 Te
19193) Hew 5, Wirtrewere (415) 981-0352 Fax
Rewrrys, Camcaar
en. an3)