arrow left
arrow right
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

NAO ACDUU ON SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jul-28-2009 11:09 am Case Number: CGC-08-472530. Filing Date: Jul-28-2009 11:09 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02568091 ORDER NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al 001002568091 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.my ~ L. Jay Pedersen - 127791 Joshua N. Rosen - 201090 H, Paul Elstratis - 242373 BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIESTEL, PEDERSEN & TREPPA LLP 601 California Street, 16th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 981-5411 Facsimile: (415) 981-0352 Attorneys for Defendanis ROD GOYA and CARMEL MISSION ad PARTNERSHIP; AKA HEATHER GLEN COURT BY. Specially Appearing Defendants DONNA GOYA, RLIZABETH GOYA, BRADLEY GOYA SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION NANCY CALLAHAN, ) Case No. CGC-08-472530 ) Plaintiff, ) PROPOSED] ORDER QUASHING ) SERVICE OF SUMMONS vs. ) ) ROD GOYA; CARMEL MISSION ) Complaint Filed: July 31, 2007 PARTNERSHIP; AKA HEATHER GLEN } Trial Date: November 2, 2009 COURT, and DOES | through 25, ) Inclusive, ) Date: June 23, 2009 ) Time: 9:30 a.m. Detendants, ) Dept: 302 ) ) ) The motion of specially appearing defendants Dorma Goya, Beth Goya, and Bradley Goya for an order quashing service of summons came on for hearing in Department 302 of this Court on June 23, 2009, No party contested the tentative tuling. The Court’s Tentative Ruling was as follows: Sei for hearing on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, line 11, DEFENDANTS DONNA GOYA, BRADLEY GOYA, ELIZABETH GOYA'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER QUASHING SIER VICE OF SUMMONS“" ‘ ~ SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS IS Granted. No Opposition filed. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the court’s tenlative ruling is adopted. Approved as to form. EXHIBIT “A” RE DOWUANCE WITH CRO 3.1312 Dated: Kathleen P. Clack, Esq. Law Offices of Kathleen P, Clack Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: SUL 27 2009 (Mankebsi\,.'\ then. JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT SHARLOTTE WALTER WooLaRn ~ [PROPOSED] ORDER QUASHING SERVICE OF SUMMONSdune 30, 2009 San Francisco Superior Court CLERK — DEPARTMENT 302 400 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: CALLAHAN v. GOYA, e¢ al. San Francisco County Superior Court Case No.: CGC08 472530 Our File No.: SFBO2-07196 Dear Clerk of the Court: Enclosed please find the defendants’ [Proposed] Order Quashing Service of Summons in the above reference-matter. On June 24, 2009, we mailed the enclosed Order to opposing counsel, As of today, June 30, 2009, no response has been received. We respectfully request that the Judge sign the order and return it to us for service on the parties. Thank you for your attention io this matter. Very truly yours, BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIKSTEL, PEDERSEN & TREPPA LLP HY Paul Efstratis HPE/ame Enclosure ec: Kathleen Clack, Iisq. Harold Jaffe, Esq. EXH | B IT "A" RicaNDS, DIESTEL — Cammesestavmts 1 Causa SITET [Jay Perenstn Enewit dame 18" Foon danees Af TOPPA W.Pan-tromeers SAN PraNvewca POTuR J. Yan ZANDT AUSON Mf CRANE a ‘Catan 9919-2805 Woranronn Reemscn Bermres¥.TA (415)981-8410 Te 19193) Hew 5, Wirtrewere (415) 981-0352 Fax Rewrrys, Camcaar en. an3)