arrow left
arrow right
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 IMA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jun-04-2009 12:50 pm Case Number: CGC-08-472530 Filing Date: Jun-04-2009 12:47 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02516401 ORDER NANCY CALLAHAN VS. ROD GOYA et al 001002516401 Instructions: Piease place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.~ _~ L. Jay Pedersen - 127791 Joshua N. Rosen - 201090 H. Paul Efstratis - 242373 BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIESTEL, PEDERSEN & TREP ie 601 California Street, 16th Floor 7 hy r, E San Francisco, CA 94108 Me l800 Coan D Si Telephone: (415) 981-5411 WN ~ “Perlor Cour, Facsimile: (415) 981-0352 QORLE in « 4 2009 LAME D) o. Attorneys for Defendants BY: ; eu, Clerk. ROD GOYA and CARMEL MISSION | Benya PARTNERSHIP: AKA HEATHER GLEN COURT Henk SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION NANCY CALLAHAN, Case No. CGC-05,472530 [PREROSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION COMPELLING THE DEPOSITION OF DR. ROGER KATZ, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, AN PARTNERSHIP; AKA HEATHER GLEN ) ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR COURT, and DOES 1 through 25, NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiff, vs. ROD GOYA; CARMEL MISSION Defendants. Complaint Filed: July 31, 2007 Trial Date: June 22, 2009 Date: June 4, 2009 Time: 11:30 a.m. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Inclusive, ) DEPOSITION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Dept: 610 ) The ex parte application of defendants ROD GOYA and CARMEL MISSION PARTNERSHIP; AKA HEATHER GLEN COURT for an order compelling the deposition of plaintiff's retained expert Dr. Roger Katz, or in the alternative, an order shortening time for service of notice of motion and motion to compel Stanley Stephenson’s deposition was heard on June 4, 2009, in department 610 of the above-entitled court. Defendants appeared by counsel Joshua N. Rosen, Esq. of Bledsoe, Cathcart, Diestel, Pedersen & Treppa LLP. 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION COMPELLING THE DEPOSITION OF DR. ROGER KATZ, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION - Nor dod10 11 ™ ~ Plaintiff Nancy Callahan appeared by counsel Kathleen Clack, Esq. Based on the pleadings an filings herein and on oral arguments presented to the court, and GOOD SE APPEARING THEREFORE, the Court orders that the deposition of plaintiff's retained Roger Katz go forward on , 2009 at om. in person at Bledsoe, Cathcart, Diestel, Pedersen & Treppa LLP, 601 California Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: Judge of the Superior Court | . OR, IN THE ALTE: TIVE, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the Court orders that the plaintiff's Petained expert Roger Katz shall be excluded from testifying at trial in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: st ___________ Judge of the Superior Court OR, IN THE SECOND ALTERNATIVE, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE: IT IS ORDERED, that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Dr. Roger Katz shall be heard on ye \\ , 2009, at FS am. in Department 610 of the above-entitled court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s service of Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel the Deposition of Dr. Roger Katz shall be served by means'of personal delivery at the hearing of the ex parte application or by means of email and overnight mail on” \ywe 4 2-087} 2009, and is adjudged sufficient notice of the pleadings referenced therein. 2 : [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS" EX PARTE APPLICATION COMPELLING THE DEPOSITION OF DR. ROGER KATZ, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION~ oN IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Opposition, shall be filed and served on Ayre 6 2009 by Ape ‘p.m. by facsimile and overnight mail. iyls FURTHER ORDERED that the Reply shall be filed and served on/ Wyre 4 Lb04 2009 Sy email and overnight mail. A IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6. t vA Judge\bf the Superior Court PAUL SLAVIT COURT COMMISSIONER ae 419s? 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION COMPELLING THE DEPOSITION OF DR. ROGER KATZ, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION