Party Statement: IN THE MATTER OF THE ROSIA L. HART REVOCABLE TRUST

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                AC TT

San Francisco Superior Courts
lnformation Technology Group

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Mar-26-2007 1:41 pm

Case Number: PTR-06-288755
Filing Date: Mar-22-2007 1:41

Juke Box: 001 Image: 01720397
DECLARATION

IN THE MATTER OF THE ROSIA L. HART REVOCABLE TRUST

001P01720397

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.24

25

LAW OFFICES OF KIM F. MALLORY

KIM I’. MALLORY, Esq,/ State Bar No. 159870
P.O. Box 21146

El Sobrante, California 94820 San Francisco County Saperior Court
(510) 223-3657; Fax (510) 223-3652

Attorney for Petitioner
ROSALIND REED WILLIAMS BY:

Deputy Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ov aoe
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO.

TN RE CONSERVATORSHIP OF
ROSIA L. HART.

KIM F. MALLORY IN SUPPORT OF
PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

HEARING: April 16, 2007
TIME: 9:30 A.M.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
}
) DEPT: 204
)

)

KIM F. MALLORY submits this supplemental declaration in support of her Petition for

attorney fees in the aforementioned matter.
1, Kim F. Mallory declare that it was in the best interest of Mrs. Hart to have Mrs.
Williams to originally file a petition to be appointed as Mrs. Hart’s conservator because:
1. Mrs. Hart requested that Mrs. Rosalind Reed Williams be appointed as her
conservator;
2. Mrs. Hart was terrified at losing all of her rights and her ability to handle her

business;

HART PETITION 1

Case NO: 288756, RELATED CASE 288755

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF24

25

3. Mrs, Hart was having her rights removed from her, and was told that a man that
she thought she could trust was committing fraud and other atrocities,
4. Mrs. Hart needed someone whom she knew she could trust, thereby also

maintaining a certain amount of control because it was someone she requested.

5. Mrs. Hart had strangers all around her telling her what she needed to do and how
to do it;

6. It was not until her niece agreed to help her did she feel a certain amount of relief
and comfort.

7. Mrs. Williams only decided to withdraw her petition after she realized that the
toad ahead of her was too great for her.

8. The fact that Mrs. Williams withdrew her petition, which was not opposed,
indicates further that she only had Mrs. Hart’s best interest in mind.

9. Mrs. Williams filed the petition to be appointed as conservator so that Mrs. Hart
would feel comfortable in discussing her personal affairs and would not feel as if she had lost
complete control over her life, which is important to a self-made independent woman.

10. Mrs. Hart resisted the conservatorship, having a trusted family member eased the
transition,

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

foregoing is true and correct to the best of my own knowledge and information and belief and|

that this document was executed in El Sobrante, California on the date indicated below.

DATED: March 21, 2007 Af; Ye Ld

KIM F. MALLORY

HART PETITION