arrow left
arrow right
  • NANCY MARIE SCOTT et al VS. AC AND S, INC. et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • NANCY MARIE SCOTT et al VS. AC AND S, INC. et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • NANCY MARIE SCOTT et al VS. AC AND S, INC. et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • NANCY MARIE SCOTT et al VS. AC AND S, INC. et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

McNAMABA, PODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, FFALZER, BORGES & BRUTMERS LLP ATTORWETS AT LAW | THOMAS E. PRALZER (State Bar No. 85261) ELECTRONICALL DENISE J. SERRA (State Bar No. 80602) ' FILED PATRICK L. MOORE (State Bar No. 84909) oe Superior Court of Catiforsia, MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, : BEATTY: SLATTERY, County of San Franciscp - PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS 1211 Newell Avenue _ JUN 12 2007 Post Office Box 5288 GORDON PARK-LI, Glerk Walnut Creel, CA 94596 BY: MAURA RAMIREZ ° Telephone: (923) 939-5330 Deputy Clerk Facsimile: (925) 939 0203 ' Attorneys for Defendant Sterling Fluid Systems (USA), LLC, misnamed as Sterling Fluid Systems (Americas) Inc., fik/a and/or Successor to Sterling Fiuid Systems (U.S.A.) fia Peerless Pumps SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CIVIL - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION as. | NANCY MARIE SCOTT, Individually and Case No. CGC-05-4432356 wa as Successor-in-Interest to DENZIL FA oh SCOTT, Decedent; JOANNE MARIE PROOF OF SERVICE FOR STERLING i WOLFARTHE; MICHAEL GERALD FLUID SYSTEMS (USA) LLC’S eS SCOTT: ROBERT DAVID SCOTT, AMENDED OBJECTION TO =. THOMAS CAREY SCOTT; MARY PLAINTIFFS’ EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT > = DENISE SOBGLIE: and FIRST DOE OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ae e through TENTH DOE, inclusive, ' SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~~ ca Fd ‘ » Plaintif£, . -Action Filed: 7/20/2007 g 6 YS. | AC AND §, ING, et al, Defendant. I hereby declare that I am a citizen of the United States, am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1211 Newell Avenue, Walnut Creek, | California 94596. a : : 3 On this date I electronically served the forgoing document, STERLING FLUID {| | SYSTEMS (USA) LLC’S AMENDED OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT as required by the Court’s Amended General Order No. 158, Order Mandating Electronic Filing and Service of | Asbestos Pleadings, in this matter, and as performed by Lexis Nexis on the parties in this action, POS FOR STERLING FLUID’S AMENDEPD OBJECTION TC PLAINTIFFS* EVIDENCE IN SUFPFORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ste eae mms ter tre gm ete een anes pet mmmMcNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PPALZBR, BORGES & BROTHERS LL? dressed as follows: SEE SERVICE LIST PROVIDED BY LEXIS NEXIS ‘The transmission was zepotted as complete and without error. A copy of the Lexis Nexis filing receipt will be maintained with the document in our file I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on June 11, 2007 at Walnut Creck, California, | ‘ i) Suzanne Negherbon ‘Suzanne Negherbon 2 ‘POS FOR STERLING FLUID'S AMENDED OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS” = VIDENCE IN SUEPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT