arrow left
arrow right
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
  • HAIR ET AL VS CITA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited document preview
						
                                

Preview

ctv-i00 ATTORNEY OR PARTY W.THOUT ATTORNEYj srArEBARNo:l$JJ lf FOR COURT USE ONLY NAME:Jssepfi Whittington, Esq. NAME:psdriEuez FIRM & Associates I128 Truxtun Avenue srREEr ADDRESS, cnv:Bakersfield srArE;CA zlPcoDE:93301 TELEPHoNE (661) 323-1400 No.: rexHo.: (661) 323-0132 E.MAILADDRESS: Alan Scott Hair ATToRNEY FoR (nare): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN srREErADDRESS,l2l5 Truxtun Avenue MAlLlNc AooREss: l2l5 Truxtun Avenue :nY coDE AND zlP Bakersfield,93301 Mefrn Diviqinn BRANCH NAME: Alan Scott Hair and Mary Charles Hair Plaintiff/Petitioner: DefendanURespondent. 3MB, LLC., et al. REQUEST FOR I x I entry of Default l-l Clerk's Judgment CASE NUMBER: (Application) l-l Court Judgment BCV-18-100592 Not for use in actions under the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act (Civ. Code, $ 1788.50 et seq.) gee CIV-IO5) 1. TO THE CLERK: On the complaint or cross-complaint filed a. on (datQ:March 13, 2018 b. by (name): Alan Scott Hair c. l-X'l Enter default of defendant (names): g17A DEVELOpMENT, INC. d. l---lI request a court judgmentunder Code of Civil Proceduresections 585(b),585(c), 989, etc., against defendant (names): (Testimony required. Apply to the clerk for a heairE date, unless the court will enter a judgment on an affidavit under Code Civ. Proc", g 585(d).) e. [--l Enter clerk's judgment (1) l---l only and issue a writ of execution on the judgment. Code of Civil Procedure for restitution of the premises section 1174(c) does not apply. (Code Civ. Proc., S 1169.) [--l lnclude in the judgment all tenants, subtenants, named claimants, and other occupants of the premises. The Prejudgment Claim of Right fo Possessrbn was served in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 415.6. (2) l- under Code of Civil Procedure section 585(a). (Completethe declarationunder Code Civ. Proc., g 585.5 on fhe reverse (item 5).) (3) l---l for default previously entered on (date): Judgment to be entered. Amount Creditsacknowledged Balance a. Demandofcomplaint ...... $ $$ b. Statement of damages* (1) Special $ $ $ (2) General $ $ $ c. lnterest $ $ $ d. Costs (see reverse) $ $ $ e. Attorney fees .. $ $ $ f. TOTALS $ $ $ S. Daily damages were demanded in complaint at the rate of: $ per day beginning (dafe): (* Personal injury or wrongtul death actions; Code Civ. Proc., g 425.11 .) is on the reverse (complete item 4). Date: Septemb er 27, 2022 Joseph Whittinston. Eso. ) CTYPE OR PRINT NAME) OF PLAINTIFF OR FOR PLAINTIFD FORCOURT (1) I---.l Defaultenteredasrequested on (date): USE ONLy (2) T--l DefaultNOT entered as requested (statereason): Clerk, by , Deputy paseIor Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Code of Civil Prrcdure, gS 58$-587, 1169 Judicial Council of California CIV-100 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT ww.@uis.@.gov lRev. January 1, 20201 (Application to Enter Default) Westtaw Doc & Fom Build* 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN 4 I am employed in the County of Kern, State of California. I am over the age of 18 5 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1128 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California 93301 6 7 On September 28, 2022, I served the foregoing document described as follows: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT 8 9 X by placing the true copies thereof by placing the original 10 11 addressed as follows: 12 BY MAIL - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope and caused such 13 envelope to be deposited in the mail at Bakersfield, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am “readily familiar” with this firm’s practice of 14 collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. 15 Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 16 motion of party, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing affidavit. 17 18 BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope and caused it to be deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained by the express 19 service carrier, or delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized by the express 20 service carrier to receive documents, in an envelope or package designated by the express 21 service carrier with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to the person on whom it is to be served, at the office address as last given by that person. 22 23 BY FACSIMILE - I caused such document to be transmitted to a facsimile machine maintained by the person on whom it is served at the facsimile machine telephone number 24 as last given by that person. 25 26 BY PERSONAL SERVICE - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope and caused it to be delivered by hand to the offices of the addressee(s). 27 28 X BY ELECTRONIC MAIL - I caused the above-referenced document to be delivered to the e-mail address as noted. PROOF OF SERVICE - 1- 1 Executed on September 28, 2022, at Bakersfield, California. 2 X (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 3 California that the above is true and correct. 4 5 6 7 STEPHANIE LOPEZ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE - 2- 1 SERVICE LIST 2 3 Mary E. Ashcraft, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants/Cross- 4 Elizabeth A. Thomasian, Esq. Complainants: 5 CHURCH LAW GROUP, INC. 3MB, LLC and Robert E. Bell 802 West Pinedale Avenue, Suite 104 6 Fresno, CA 93711 7 eservice@churh-law.com mashcraft@church-law.com 8 ethomasian@church-law.com 9 mlujan@church-law.com 10 Jody Steinberg, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant: 11 Nicholas S. Walls, Esq. Juicy Burger Corporation and 12 Hanger, Steinberg, Shapiro & Ash, ALC Mohamed Muthana, Jr. 13 LOS ANGELES • Inland Empire • Bakersfield 14 21031 Ventura Blvd, Suite 800, 15 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 direct (818) 206-0216 16 nsw@hssalaw.com 17 js@hssalaw.com 18 19 Nathan M. Hodges, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant: Hodges Law Group Treble LLC 20 1925 G Street 21 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Nathan@hodges-lawgroup.com 22 kelly@hodges-lawgroup.com 23 24 25 26 27 28 SERVICE LIST -3