No Value: LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY vs. DAVID MAR, et al

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                1   STEPHEN J. GOROG
                          5916 Hazel Avenue
                     2    Richmond, CA 94805
                          (415) 309-0235
                     3

                     4    ATTORNEY IN PRO PER

                     5
                     6
                                                            SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
                     7
                                                            FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
                     8

                     9
                          LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY,                                   )  Case No.:    22 CIV 03316
                    10                                                             )
                                            Plaintiff,                             )
                    11                                                             )  ANSWER TO COMPLAINT-IN-
                                   V.                                              )  INTERPLEADER BY DEFENDANT
                    12                                                             )  STEPHEN J. GOROG
                          DAVID MAR and SAMANTHA MAR, as                           )
                    13    trustees of the David Mar and Samantha Mar               )
                          Revocable Living Trust dated 6/13/2016;                  )
                   14     STEPHEN J. GOROG; and DOES 1 through                     )
                          50 inclusive,                                            )
                   15                                                              )
                          _   _ __       ______,D=e=fi=en.,.,d..,,an=ts'-.'--_ _ _ _ _ _)
                   16
                                   Defendant Stephen J. Gorog, Answers the Complaint in Interpleader ("Complaint"),
                   17

                   18     as follows:

                   19              1.  Defendant is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations

                   20                  contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint.
                   21
                                   2.   Defendant is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations
                   22
                                       contained in Paragraph 2 of the Complaint.
                   23
                                   3.  Defendant denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of the Complaint, as
                   24

                   25                  Defendant resides in Contra Costa County.

                   26              4.   Defendant is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations

                   27                  contained in Paragraph 2 of the Complaint.
                   28
                                   5.  Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 5.
                      1             6.  Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 6.
                      2             7.  Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 7.
                      3
                                    8.  Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 8.
                      4
                                    9.   Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 9.
                      5
                                    10. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 10.
                      6

                      7             11 . Defendant is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations in

                      8                 Paragraph 11.
                      9
                                    12. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 12.
                    10
                                    13. Defendant admits he did not respond to the second request and Defendant is
                    11
                                        without sufficient information to admit or deny if the Mar Defendants responded.
                    12
                                    14. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 14.
                    13

                    14              15. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 15.

                    15              16. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 16.
                    16
                                    17. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 17.
                    17
                                    18. Defendant is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations in
                    18
                                        Paragraph 18.
                    19

                    20             WHEREFORE, Defendant Stephen J. Gorog requests the following relief:

                    21              1.  That the Court enter an order distributing the interpleaded funds in a just and

                    22                  equitable manner.
                    23
                    24
                          DATED:      September~2022
                    25

                    26

                    27

                    28
                                                                                    2