On March 15, 2022 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Arntsen Family Partnership, Lp,
Arntsen, Robert,
Brian Christopher Dunn Custodianship,
Ho, John,
Huang, Quanyu,
Lee, Mary,
and
Black Horse Holdings, Llc,
Bragg, David M,
Caproc Iii, Llc,
Davis, Gregory J,
Huang, Quanyu,
Huish, Dale,
Justesen, Jason,
Kludt, Kurtis Stuart,
Mclan Trust,
Monks Family Trust,
Oneil, Scott,
Paramont Capital, Llc,
Paramont Woodside, Llc,
Silicon Valley Real Ventures, Llc,
Stoker, Diane,
Stoker, Phil,
Svrv 385 Moore, Llc,
Svrv 387 Moore, Llc,
Teh Capital, Llc,
Wild Rose Irrevocable Trust,
Wolfe, Kevin,
Wz Partners Llc,
for (16) Unlimited Fraud
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
1 Ryan van Steenis (SBN 254542)
Ajamie LLP
2
711 Louisiana Street, South Tower, Suite 2150
3 Houston, Texas 77002
713-860-1600
4 713-860-1699 (Fax)
rvansteenis@ajamie.com
5
6 Attorney for Defendants
David M. Bragg
7 Silicon Valley Real Ventures LLC
8
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
11 Robert Arntsen; Mary Lee; Arnsten Family Case No.: 22-CIV-01148
12 Partnership, LP; and Brian Christopher Dunn
Custodianship,
13 DEFENDANT SILICON VALLEY REAL
Plaintiffs,
14 VENTURES LLC’S RESPONSES TO
Vs. PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF FORM
15 INTERROGATORIES
16 David M. Bragg; Kurtis Stuart Kludt; Silicon
Valley Real Ventures LLC, SVRV 385 Moore, Judge: Hon. Robert D. Foiles
17 LLC; SVRV 387 Moore, LLC; Gregory J. Dept: 21
Davis; Paramont Woodside, LLC; and Paramont Trial Date: None Set
18
Capital, LLC, Date Filed: Mar. 15, 2022
19
Defendants.
20
21
22 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiffs
23 RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant Silicon Valley Real Ventures LLC
24 SET NUMBER: 1
25
26
27
28 1
Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
1 Defendant SVRV hereby submits the following responses to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Form
2
Interrogatories
3
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 1.0
4
1.1: Ryan van Steenis, 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2150, Houston, Texas 770019 – counsel for
5
6 defendant; Mr. Bragg, former manager and owner of Defendant
7 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 4.0
8
4.1: No.
9
4.2: No.
10
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERRGATORY 12.0
11
12 12.1: Celeste Rogers 412 Via Primavera Dr. San Jose, CA, 95111-3833 csimr2008@yahoo.com
13 408.425.8961; Colleen Marchbank Broker Associate & RE Advisor DRE#: 01053725
14
colleenmarchbank@gmail.com 16268 Los Gatos Blvd. Los Gatos CA 95032 408.218.7967;
15
Lukas Leuthold 304 Mountain View Ave. Santa Cruz, CA 95062-3660
16
lukas@lukasleuthold.com 415.868.5147; Kim Kludt 1134 W. Knickerbocker Sunnyvale CA
17
18 94087 Kskgt1@gmail.com 408.718.2717; Plaintiffs; Defendants
19 12. 2: No.
20
12.3: No.
21
12.4: No.
22
12.5: No.
23
24 12.6: No.
25 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY 15.0
26
15.1: Defendant SVRV does not yet have pleadings on file.
27
28 2
Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
1 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 17.0
2
Defendant SVRV responds to interrogatory 17.1 as follows:
3
(a) State the number of the request: 1, 2, 5, and 6
4
(b) State all facts upon which you base your response: Defendant never understood Plaintiff
5
6 to be making any loans to SVRV. Plaintiffs had been investors of SVRV, and had only
7 ever invested with Defendant. Defendant is not aware of any loans being made for the
8
Project, but understood the additional capital to be contributions in Plaintiffs investment
9
in the Project itself. Defendant is not aware of any loan terms pursuant to the oral
10
contracts Plaintiffs are alleging.
11
12 (c) state the names, ADDRESSES, and telephone numbers of all PERSONS who have
13 knowledge of those facts; Plaintiffs, contacted through counsel.
14
(d) identify all DOCUMENTS and other tangible things that support your response and state
15
the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the PERSON who has each
16
DOCUMENT or thing: Defendant is not presently aware of any documents that support
17
18 the terms of an oral loan agreement. But investigation is ongoing and Defendant reserves
19 the right to supplement this response.
20
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 50:
21
This interrogatory applies to pleadings that are no longer operable, so Defendant is uncertain
22
how to respond. But with respect to the agreements alleged in the pleadings, the written
23
24 documents speak for themselves, and the remaining purported agreements are oral agreements
25 Plaintiffs are alleging with terms and conditions unknown to Defendant SVRV. Accordingly,
26
27
28 3
Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
1 Defendant cannot provide the information this interrogatory is seeking. However, as discovery
2
is ongoing Defendant will supplement its response to this interrogatory if necessary.
3
Dated: August 29, 2022 Ajamie LLP
4
5 _/s/ Ryan van Steenis________________
Ryan van Steenis
6 Attorney for Silicon Valley Real Ventures
7
LLC
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 4
Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
3 I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this action. I hereby certify that on
4 August 29, 2022, I served the following document(s) on the parties in the above entitled action:
5
DEFENDANT SVRV TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF FORM INTERROGATORIES
6
Via E-Mail: The above referenced document was emailed to the following persons at the
7
following email addresses:
8
9 Collin J. Vierra
cvierra@eimerstahl.com
10 Counsel for Plaintiffs
11
Jessica Chong
12 jchong@spencerfane.com
Brian Zimmerman
13 bzimmerman@spencerfane.com
Counsel for Defendants Gregory J. Davis, Paramont Woodside, LLC, and Paramont
14
Capital, LLC
15
Mark Poe
16 mpoe@gawpoe.com
Counsel for Defendant Kurtis S. Kludt
17
18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
19 foregoing is a true and correct statement.
20
Dated: August 29, 2022
21 _/s/ Ryan van Steenis
Ryan van Steenis
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 6
Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
Exhibit 5
1 Ryan van Steenis (SBN 254542)
Ajamie LLP
2
711 Louisiana Street, South Tower, Suite 2150
3 Houston, Texas 77002
713-860-1600
4 713-860-1699 (Fax)
rvansteenis@ajamie.com
5
6 Attorney for Defendants
David M. Bragg
7 Silicon Valley Real Ventures LLC
8
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
11 ROBERT ARNTSEN; MARY LEE; ARNSTEN Case No.: 22-CIV-01148
12 FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP; AND BRIAN
CHRISTOPHER DUNN CUSTODIANSHIP,
13 DEFENDANTS DAVID M. BRAGG
Plaintiffs,
14 RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET
Vs. OF FORM INTERROGATORIES
15
DAVID M. BRAGG; KURTIS STUART KLUDT; Judge: Hon. Robert D. Foiles
16 Dept: 21
SILICON VALLEY REAL VENTURES LLC, SVRV
17 385 Moore, LLC; SVRV 387 Moore, LLC; Trial Date: None Set
Gregory J. Davis; Paramont Woodside, LLC; Date Filed: Mar. 15, 2022
18
and Paramont Capital, LLC,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiffs
23 RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant David M. Bragg
24 SET NUMBER: 1
25
26
27
28 1
Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
1 Defendant Bragg hereby submits the following responses to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Form
2
Interrogatories
3
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 1.0
4
1.1: Ryan van Steenis, 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2150, Houston, Texas 770019 – counsel for
5
6 defendant; Mr. Bragg.
7 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 2.0
8
2.1 (a) David Bragg; (b) n/a; (c) n/a.
9
2.2 11/29/1977 Tarzana, CA
10
2.3: Yes, CA B3849878 Class C and M1
11
12 2.4 Yes
13 2.5 Current 4/10/20-Current 7230 Fuller Drive, Granite Bay, CA 95746 own
14
previous 6/1/18-4/10/20 1011 Greenwood Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025 renting
15
previous approx 5/17/20-6/1/18 2 Heather Drive, Atherton, CA 94027 renting
16
2.6 11/17/2003 to present Menlo Park Fire/Firefighter Engineer and Captain 300 Middlefield
17
18 Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
19 Previous and concurrent 7/2014-5/2020 Managing Member of multiple Real Estate Construction
20
and Development LLC projects and SVRV LLC. 165-B Constitution Drive Menlo Park, CA
21
94025.
22
2.7 Santa Ynez High School, Santa Ynez, CA 91-95; Santa Barbara City College 96-98 no
23
24 degree, College of San Mateo, San Mateo, CA 98-99. Some College HS diploma and no degree
25 2.8 No
26
2.11 I was acting as a manager and owner of SVRV
27
28 2
Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
1 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 4.0
2
4.1: No.
3
4.2: No.
4
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERRGATORY 12.0
5
6 12.1: Celeste Rogers 412 Via Primavera Dr. San Jose, CA, 95111-3833 csimr2008@yahoo.com
7 408.425.8961; Colleen Marchbank Broker Associate & RE Advisor DRE#: 01053725
8
colleenmarchbank@gmail.com 16268 Los Gatos Blvd. Los Gatos CA 95032 408.218.7967;
9
Lukas Leuthold 304 Mountain View Ave. Santa Cruz, CA 95062-3660
10
lukas@lukasleuthold.com 415.868.5147; Kim Kludt 1134 W. Knickerbocker Sunnyvale CA
11
12 94087 Kskgt1@gmail.com 408.718.2717; Plaintiffs; Defendants.
13 12. 2: No.
14
12.3: No.
15
12.4: No.
16
12.5: No.
17
18 12.6: No.
19 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY 15.0
20
15.1: Defendant Bragg do not yet have pleadings on file.
21
RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 17.0
22
(a) State the number of the request: 1, 2, 5, and 6
23
24 (b) State all facts upon which you base your response: Plaintiffs had been investors of
25 SVRV, and had never invested with Bragg personally or made him any loans. Bragg is
26
not aware of any loans being made for the Project, but understood the additional capital
27
28 3
Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
1 to be contributions in Plaintiffs investment in the Project itself. Defendant is not aware of
2
any loan terms pursuant to the oral contracts Plaintiffs are alleging.
3
(c) state the names, ADDRESSES, and telephone numbers of all PERSONS who have
4
knowledge of those facts: Plaintiffs, who can be contacted through counsel.
5
6 (d) identify all DOCUMENTS and other tangible things that support your response and state
7 the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the PERSON who has each
8
DOCUMENT or thing: Defendant is not presently aware of any documents that support
9
the terms of an oral loan agreement. But investigation is ongoing and Defendant reserves
10
the right to supplement this response.
11
12 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 50:
13 This interrogatory applies to pleadings that are no longer operable, so Defendant is uncertain
14
how to respond. But with respect to the agreements alleged in the pleadings, the written
15
documents speak for themselves, and the remaining purported agreements are oral agreements
16
Plaintiffs are alleging with terms and conditions unknown to Defendant Bragg. Accordingly,
17
18 Defendant Bragg cannot provide the information this interrogatory is seeking. However, as
19 discovery is ongoing Defendant will supplement his response to this interrogatory if necessary.
20
Dated: August 29, 2022 Ajamie LLP
21
/s/ Ryan van Steenis
22 Ryan van Steenis
Attorney for Defendants David M. Bragg
23
24
25
26
27
28 4
Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
1 PROOF OF SERVICE
2
I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this action. I hereby certify that on
3
August 29, 2022, I served the following document(s) on the parties in the above entitled action:
4
DEFENDANT DAVID M. BRAGG’S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF
5
FORM INTERROGATORIES
6
Via E-Mail: The above referenced document was emailed to the following persons at the
7
following email addresses:
8
9 Collin J. Vierra
cvierra@eimerstahl.com
10 Counsel for Plaintiffs
11
Jessica Chong
12 jchong@spencerfane.com
Brian Zimmerman
13 bzimmerman@spencerfane.com
Counsel for Defendants Gregory J. Davis, Paramont Woodside, LLC, and Paramont
14
Capital, LLC
15
Mark Poe
16 mpoe@gawpoe.com
Counsel for Defendant Kurtis S. Kludt
17
18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
19 foregoing is a true and correct statement.
20
Dated: August 29, 2022
21 /s/ Ryan van Steenis
Ryan van Steenis
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 6
Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 8
9/2/22, 12:18 PM Covid-19 Testing Your Results Walgreens Find Care.png
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGqQJqHPFfSZNJrsGXLChTmkdGZ?projector=1&messagePartId=0.1 1/1
Exhibit 9
Preview
Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 1 Ryan van Steenis (SBN 254542) Ajamie LLP 2 711 Louisiana Street, South Tower, Suite 2150 3 Houston, Texas 77002 713-860-1600 4 713-860-1699 (Fax) rvansteenis@ajamie.com 5 6 Attorney for Defendants David M. Bragg 7 Silicon Valley Real Ventures LLC 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 11 Robert Arntsen; Mary Lee; Arnsten Family Case No.: 22-CIV-01148 12 Partnership, LP; and Brian Christopher Dunn Custodianship, 13 DEFENDANT SILICON VALLEY REAL Plaintiffs, 14 VENTURES LLC’S RESPONSES TO Vs. PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF FORM 15 INTERROGATORIES 16 David M. Bragg; Kurtis Stuart Kludt; Silicon Valley Real Ventures LLC, SVRV 385 Moore, Judge: Hon. Robert D. Foiles 17 LLC; SVRV 387 Moore, LLC; Gregory J. Dept: 21 Davis; Paramont Woodside, LLC; and Paramont Trial Date: None Set 18 Capital, LLC, Date Filed: Mar. 15, 2022 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiffs 23 RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant Silicon Valley Real Ventures LLC 24 SET NUMBER: 1 25 26 27 28 1 Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One 1 Defendant SVRV hereby submits the following responses to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Form 2 Interrogatories 3 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 1.0 4 1.1: Ryan van Steenis, 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2150, Houston, Texas 770019 – counsel for 5 6 defendant; Mr. Bragg, former manager and owner of Defendant 7 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 4.0 8 4.1: No. 9 4.2: No. 10 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERRGATORY 12.0 11 12 12.1: Celeste Rogers 412 Via Primavera Dr. San Jose, CA, 95111-3833 csimr2008@yahoo.com 13 408.425.8961; Colleen Marchbank Broker Associate & RE Advisor DRE#: 01053725 14 colleenmarchbank@gmail.com 16268 Los Gatos Blvd. Los Gatos CA 95032 408.218.7967; 15 Lukas Leuthold 304 Mountain View Ave. Santa Cruz, CA 95062-3660 16 lukas@lukasleuthold.com 415.868.5147; Kim Kludt 1134 W. Knickerbocker Sunnyvale CA 17 18 94087 Kskgt1@gmail.com 408.718.2717; Plaintiffs; Defendants 19 12. 2: No. 20 12.3: No. 21 12.4: No. 22 12.5: No. 23 24 12.6: No. 25 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY 15.0 26 15.1: Defendant SVRV does not yet have pleadings on file. 27 28 2 Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One 1 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 17.0 2 Defendant SVRV responds to interrogatory 17.1 as follows: 3 (a) State the number of the request: 1, 2, 5, and 6 4 (b) State all facts upon which you base your response: Defendant never understood Plaintiff 5 6 to be making any loans to SVRV. Plaintiffs had been investors of SVRV, and had only 7 ever invested with Defendant. Defendant is not aware of any loans being made for the 8 Project, but understood the additional capital to be contributions in Plaintiffs investment 9 in the Project itself. Defendant is not aware of any loan terms pursuant to the oral 10 contracts Plaintiffs are alleging. 11 12 (c) state the names, ADDRESSES, and telephone numbers of all PERSONS who have 13 knowledge of those facts; Plaintiffs, contacted through counsel. 14 (d) identify all DOCUMENTS and other tangible things that support your response and state 15 the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the PERSON who has each 16 DOCUMENT or thing: Defendant is not presently aware of any documents that support 17 18 the terms of an oral loan agreement. But investigation is ongoing and Defendant reserves 19 the right to supplement this response. 20 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 50: 21 This interrogatory applies to pleadings that are no longer operable, so Defendant is uncertain 22 how to respond. But with respect to the agreements alleged in the pleadings, the written 23 24 documents speak for themselves, and the remaining purported agreements are oral agreements 25 Plaintiffs are alleging with terms and conditions unknown to Defendant SVRV. Accordingly, 26 27 28 3 Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One 1 Defendant cannot provide the information this interrogatory is seeking. However, as discovery 2 is ongoing Defendant will supplement its response to this interrogatory if necessary. 3 Dated: August 29, 2022 Ajamie LLP 4 5 _/s/ Ryan van Steenis________________ Ryan van Steenis 6 Attorney for Silicon Valley Real Ventures 7 LLC 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 3 I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this action. I hereby certify that on 4 August 29, 2022, I served the following document(s) on the parties in the above entitled action: 5 DEFENDANT SVRV TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF FORM INTERROGATORIES 6 Via E-Mail: The above referenced document was emailed to the following persons at the 7 following email addresses: 8 9 Collin J. Vierra cvierra@eimerstahl.com 10 Counsel for Plaintiffs 11 Jessica Chong 12 jchong@spencerfane.com Brian Zimmerman 13 bzimmerman@spencerfane.com Counsel for Defendants Gregory J. Davis, Paramont Woodside, LLC, and Paramont 14 Capital, LLC 15 Mark Poe 16 mpoe@gawpoe.com Counsel for Defendant Kurtis S. Kludt 17 18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 19 foregoing is a true and correct statement. 20 Dated: August 29, 2022 21 _/s/ Ryan van Steenis Ryan van Steenis 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 Defendant SVRV LLC’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One Exhibit 5 1 Ryan van Steenis (SBN 254542) Ajamie LLP 2 711 Louisiana Street, South Tower, Suite 2150 3 Houston, Texas 77002 713-860-1600 4 713-860-1699 (Fax) rvansteenis@ajamie.com 5 6 Attorney for Defendants David M. Bragg 7 Silicon Valley Real Ventures LLC 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 11 ROBERT ARNTSEN; MARY LEE; ARNSTEN Case No.: 22-CIV-01148 12 FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP; AND BRIAN CHRISTOPHER DUNN CUSTODIANSHIP, 13 DEFENDANTS DAVID M. BRAGG Plaintiffs, 14 RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET Vs. OF FORM INTERROGATORIES 15 DAVID M. BRAGG; KURTIS STUART KLUDT; Judge: Hon. Robert D. Foiles 16 Dept: 21 SILICON VALLEY REAL VENTURES LLC, SVRV 17 385 Moore, LLC; SVRV 387 Moore, LLC; Trial Date: None Set Gregory J. Davis; Paramont Woodside, LLC; Date Filed: Mar. 15, 2022 18 and Paramont Capital, LLC, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiffs 23 RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant David M. Bragg 24 SET NUMBER: 1 25 26 27 28 1 Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One 1 Defendant Bragg hereby submits the following responses to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Form 2 Interrogatories 3 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 1.0 4 1.1: Ryan van Steenis, 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2150, Houston, Texas 770019 – counsel for 5 6 defendant; Mr. Bragg. 7 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 2.0 8 2.1 (a) David Bragg; (b) n/a; (c) n/a. 9 2.2 11/29/1977 Tarzana, CA 10 2.3: Yes, CA B3849878 Class C and M1 11 12 2.4 Yes 13 2.5 Current 4/10/20-Current 7230 Fuller Drive, Granite Bay, CA 95746 own 14 previous 6/1/18-4/10/20 1011 Greenwood Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025 renting 15 previous approx 5/17/20-6/1/18 2 Heather Drive, Atherton, CA 94027 renting 16 2.6 11/17/2003 to present Menlo Park Fire/Firefighter Engineer and Captain 300 Middlefield 17 18 Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025. 19 Previous and concurrent 7/2014-5/2020 Managing Member of multiple Real Estate Construction 20 and Development LLC projects and SVRV LLC. 165-B Constitution Drive Menlo Park, CA 21 94025. 22 2.7 Santa Ynez High School, Santa Ynez, CA 91-95; Santa Barbara City College 96-98 no 23 24 degree, College of San Mateo, San Mateo, CA 98-99. Some College HS diploma and no degree 25 2.8 No 26 2.11 I was acting as a manager and owner of SVRV 27 28 2 Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One 1 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 4.0 2 4.1: No. 3 4.2: No. 4 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERRGATORY 12.0 5 6 12.1: Celeste Rogers 412 Via Primavera Dr. San Jose, CA, 95111-3833 csimr2008@yahoo.com 7 408.425.8961; Colleen Marchbank Broker Associate & RE Advisor DRE#: 01053725 8 colleenmarchbank@gmail.com 16268 Los Gatos Blvd. Los Gatos CA 95032 408.218.7967; 9 Lukas Leuthold 304 Mountain View Ave. Santa Cruz, CA 95062-3660 10 lukas@lukasleuthold.com 415.868.5147; Kim Kludt 1134 W. Knickerbocker Sunnyvale CA 11 12 94087 Kskgt1@gmail.com 408.718.2717; Plaintiffs; Defendants. 13 12. 2: No. 14 12.3: No. 15 12.4: No. 16 12.5: No. 17 18 12.6: No. 19 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY 15.0 20 15.1: Defendant Bragg do not yet have pleadings on file. 21 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 17.0 22 (a) State the number of the request: 1, 2, 5, and 6 23 24 (b) State all facts upon which you base your response: Plaintiffs had been investors of 25 SVRV, and had never invested with Bragg personally or made him any loans. Bragg is 26 not aware of any loans being made for the Project, but understood the additional capital 27 28 3 Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One 1 to be contributions in Plaintiffs investment in the Project itself. Defendant is not aware of 2 any loan terms pursuant to the oral contracts Plaintiffs are alleging. 3 (c) state the names, ADDRESSES, and telephone numbers of all PERSONS who have 4 knowledge of those facts: Plaintiffs, who can be contacted through counsel. 5 6 (d) identify all DOCUMENTS and other tangible things that support your response and state 7 the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the PERSON who has each 8 DOCUMENT or thing: Defendant is not presently aware of any documents that support 9 the terms of an oral loan agreement. But investigation is ongoing and Defendant reserves 10 the right to supplement this response. 11 12 RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 50: 13 This interrogatory applies to pleadings that are no longer operable, so Defendant is uncertain 14 how to respond. But with respect to the agreements alleged in the pleadings, the written 15 documents speak for themselves, and the remaining purported agreements are oral agreements 16 Plaintiffs are alleging with terms and conditions unknown to Defendant Bragg. Accordingly, 17 18 Defendant Bragg cannot provide the information this interrogatory is seeking. However, as 19 discovery is ongoing Defendant will supplement his response to this interrogatory if necessary. 20 Dated: August 29, 2022 Ajamie LLP 21 /s/ Ryan van Steenis 22 Ryan van Steenis Attorney for Defendants David M. Bragg 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this action. I hereby certify that on 3 August 29, 2022, I served the following document(s) on the parties in the above entitled action: 4 DEFENDANT DAVID M. BRAGG’S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF 5 FORM INTERROGATORIES 6 Via E-Mail: The above referenced document was emailed to the following persons at the 7 following email addresses: 8 9 Collin J. Vierra cvierra@eimerstahl.com 10 Counsel for Plaintiffs 11 Jessica Chong 12 jchong@spencerfane.com Brian Zimmerman 13 bzimmerman@spencerfane.com Counsel for Defendants Gregory J. Davis, Paramont Woodside, LLC, and Paramont 14 Capital, LLC 15 Mark Poe 16 mpoe@gawpoe.com Counsel for Defendant Kurtis S. Kludt 17 18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 19 foregoing is a true and correct statement. 20 Dated: August 29, 2022 21 /s/ Ryan van Steenis Ryan van Steenis 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 Defendant Bragg’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 9/2/22, 12:18 PM Covid-19 Testing Your Results Walgreens Find Care.png https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGqQJqHPFfSZNJrsGXLChTmkdGZ?projector=1&messagePartId=0.1 1/1 Exhibit 9