On July 01, 2013 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Clearview Industries Inc,
Moler, Patsy,
and
Clearview Industries Inc,
Hulme, Chris,
Hulme, Jennifer,
for Unlimited Fraud (16)
in the District Court of Santa Barbara County.
Preview
‘1'
B
m m
.
Law Oflices 0f supsm on of A
MICHAEL P. RING (360»: v of gANTA gArkEERAM
AND ASSOCIATES
Michael P. Ring, State Bar #95922 SEP 3 0 2015 NW
Iris L. M. Ring, State Bar #298179 Darrel E. Parker. EXOCUIIVG Officer V
1234 Santa Barbara Street BY
Santa Barbara, CA 93101 enny oo. eputy 9
CA
(805) 564-2333
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PATSY MOLER
m
J
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA
ANACAPA DIVISION
$0
ST
10 PATSY MOLER, ) CASE NO.: 1417847 L
PROOF OF SERVICE 0N
.
) PLAINTIFF’S
11 Plaintiff, OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY OR
)
v. JUDGMENT IN THE
SUMMARY
)
12 ) ALTERNATIVE
Chris Hulme, individually and dba ) ADJUDICATION
13 Clearview Industries, Inc., and DOES 1 )
through 10, inclusive -
) Date: October 14, 2015
14
) Time: 9:30 A.M.
Defendants. ) Dept: SBl
15 l (Assigned to the Hon. James E. Herman)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.1.
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION
H PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA
I am employed in the County of Santa Barbara, State of California. Iam over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1234 Santa Barbara Street, Santa Barbara,
California, 93101.
On September 30, 2015, I served the foregoin document described as OPPOSITION TO
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN HE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION, INCLUDING OPPOSITION POINTS & AUTHORITIES, SEPARATE
\OWQGMJXWN
STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE, OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE & PROPOSED
ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE on the interested parties in this action
_xx_by placing
JEFFREY M. BENNION
_ the original xx a true copy thereof addressed as follows:
2869 INDIA ST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92103
jeff@jbennionlaw.com
VIA EMAIL ONLY PER
AGREEMENT 0!" THE PAR TIES
(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I caused such documents to be
~
EicEea up by Federal Express at 1234 Santa Barbara St., Santa Barbara, California, 93101, in an
ox designated by Federal Express for overnight delivery, with delivery fees provided for,
addressed to the person on whom it is to be served.
(BY FAX) I caused the above-referenced document(s) to be sent via facsimile to the above-
named persons at the following facsimile number:
xx (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE) The electronic address where served
NNNNNNNNNe—ae—Ae—A—Ar—AHe—Ae—ae—In—n
I this is
jeff@jbennlonlaw.com.
(BY PLACING FOR COLLECTION AND MAILING) placed above-mentioned
“\loqnh‘oomflou-AWNHO
I the
document(s) in sealed envelope(s) addressed as set forth above, and placed the envelope(s) for
collection and mailing following ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with the firm’s
practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal
'
Service. Under that practice it would be deposited with the US. Postal Service on that same day
with postage thereon fully prepaid at 1234 Santa Barbara Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 in the
ordinary course of business.
_xx_ (STATE) Ideclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
above istrue and correct.
/
Executed on September 30, 2015, at Santa Barbara, California.
M
Type or Print Name
'
ature
’
l
PROOF OF SERVICE
Document Filed Date
September 30, 2015
Case Filing Date
July 01, 2013
Category
Unlimited Fraud (16)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.