On March 15, 2022 a
62523Propo03efef
was filed
involving a dispute between
Arntsen Family Partnership, Lp,
Arntsen, Robert,
Brian Christopher Dunn Custodianship,
Ho, John,
Huang, Quanyu,
Lee, Mary,
and
Black Horse Holdings, Llc,
Bragg, David M,
Caproc Iii, Llc,
Davis, Gregory J,
Huang, Quanyu,
Huish, Dale,
Justesen, Jason,
Kludt, Kurtis Stuart,
Mclan Trust,
Monks Family Trust,
Oneil, Scott,
Paramont Capital, Llc,
Paramont Woodside, Llc,
Silicon Valley Real Ventures, Llc,
Stoker, Diane,
Stoker, Phil,
Svrv 385 Moore, Llc,
Svrv 387 Moore, Llc,
Teh Capital, Llc,
Wild Rose Irrevocable Trust,
Wolfe, Kevin,
Wz Partners Llc,
for (16) Unlimited Fraud
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
1 Collin J. Vierra (State Bar No. 322720)
EIMER STAHL LLP
2 99 Almaden Blvd., Suite 641
San Jose, CA 95113-1605
3 Telephone: (408) 889-1668
4 Email: cvierra@eimerstahl.com
5 Attorney for Plaintiffs
6
7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
8
9
Robert Arntsen; Mary Lee; Arntsen Family Case No. 22-CIV-01148
10 Partnership, LP; and Brian Christopher Dunn
Custodianship; Date: September 16, 2022
11 Time: 9:00a.m.
12 Plaintiffs, Dept. 21
v.
13 Hon. Robert D. Foiles
David M. Bragg; Kurtis Stuart Kludt; Silicon
14 Valley Real Ventures LLC; SVRV 385 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Moore, LLC; SVRV 387 Moore, LLC; PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL
15 Gregory J. Davis; Kevin Wolfe; Jason AND FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST
16 Justesen; Paramont Woodside, LLC; and DEFENDANTS DAVID M. BRAGG,
Paramont Capital, LLC; KURTIS S. KLUDT, AND SILICON
17 VALLEY REAL VENTURES, LLC, AND
Defendants. ATTORNEY RYAN VAN STEENIS
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR
28 SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS DAVID M. BRAGG, KURTIS S. KLUDT, AND
SILICON VALLEY REAL VENTURES, LLC, AND ATTORNEY RYAN VAN STEENIS
1 This matter came for hearing on September 16, 2022 at 9:00am before the Honorable
2 Robert D. Foiles, in Department 21 of the above-captioned Court, in response to Plaintiffs’
Motion to Compel and for Sanctions against Defendants David M. Bragg, Kurtis S. Kludt, and
3
Silicon Valley Real Ventures, LLC, and attorney Ryan Van Steenis.
4
Plaintiffs’ submissions demonstrate that Defendant Kurtis S. Kludt has, without
5 justification, refused to conduct a reasonably diligent search for documents responsive to
6 Plaintiffs’ discovery requests and to produce all responsive documents in his possession,
7 custody, or control.
8 Plaintiffs’ submissions demonstrate that Defendants David M. Bragg and Silicon Valley
Real Ventures, LLC have, without justification, refused to participate in this litigation, including
9
by refusing to respond to Plaintiffs’ requests for discovery.
10
Plaintiffs’ submissions demonstrate that attorney Ryan Van Steenis has, without
11 justification, refused to respond to Plaintiffs’ requests for discovery or to meet and confer in
12 good faith with Plaintiffs’ counsel about the same.
13 This Court has broad authority to issue sanctions for “misuse of the discovery process”
14 under Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.030. The Court finds that Defendants David M.
Bragg, Kurtis S. Kludt, and Silicon Valley Real Ventures, LLC, and attorney Ryan Van Steenis,
15
have no substantial justification for their behavior and that no other circumstances exist that
16
would make the imposition of sanctions unjust.
17
Based upon Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and for Sanctions, the accompanying
18 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the Declaration of Collin J. Vierra in support thereof,
19 Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing:
20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Kurtis S. Kludt shall be subject to a monetary sanction of
21
$ ___________, payable to Plaintiffs’ counsel for distribution to Plaintiffs in accordance with the
22
terms of their representation.
23
2. Defendants David M. Bragg and Silicon Valley Real Ventures, LLC shall, jointly
24 and severally, be subject to a monetary sanction of $ ___________, payable to Plaintiffs’ counsel
25 for distribution to Plaintiffs in accordance with the terms of their representation.
26
2
27 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR
SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS DAVID M. BRAGG, KURTIS S. KLUDT, AND
28 SILICON VALLEY REAL VENTURES, LLC, AND ATTORNEY RYAN VAN STEENIS
1 3. Attorney Ryan Van Steenis shall be subject to a monetary sanction of
2 $ ___________, payable to Plaintiffs’ counsel for distribution to Plaintiffs in accordance with the
terms of their representation.
3
4. Defendant Kurtis S. Kludt shall provide his legal counsel direct access to each of
4
his devices, accounts, and applications that may contain documents or communications relevant
5 to this litigation, including without limitation his cell phone and computers; Google Drive, Box,
6 and Dropbox accounts; and k@realsv.com, kurtm007@me.com, kurtm007icloud@gmail.com,
7 and k7kurt1984@gmail.com email accounts, and counsel shall produce all relevant, non-
8 privileged documents and communications to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this Order.
5. Defendants David M. Bragg and Silicon Valley Real Ventures, LLC shall provide
9
Plaintiffs direct access to all Google Drive, Dropbox, and Box folders that contain documents
10
relevant to this litigation, to provide Plaintiffs with the login credentials for all email accounts
11 through which they engaged in communications relevant to this litigation including without
12 limitation d@realsv.com, d@svreventures.com, and dave.bragg@gmail.com, to produce all text
13 messages and other communications that they have exchanged with the other Defendants from
14 the filing of Plaintiffs’ initial Complaint to the present; and to respond to Plaintiffs’ special
interrogatories numbered 1 through 6 and 10 through 12, within 7 days of this Order.
15
16
17
Dated: ____________ By: ______________________
18 Hon. Robert D. Foiles
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
27 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR
SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS DAVID M. BRAGG, KURTIS S. KLUDT, AND
28 SILICON VALLEY REAL VENTURES, LLC, AND ATTORNEY RYAN VAN STEENIS