On December 09, 2020 a
ADR Referral
was filed
involving a dispute between
Skucas, Deborah,
and
County Of San Mateo,
Does 1 To 100, Inclusive,
State Of California Acting By And Through Department Of Transportation,
State Of California Department Of Transportation,
for (23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
AS THE ACTION IS “AT ISSUE” AND CASE IS ORDERED TO ADR
FILED
In the Matter of: Deborah Skucas vs. County of San Mateo, SAN MATEO COUNTY
et al 7/1/2021
By /s/ Liliana Cervantes
Case Number: 20-CIV-05519
ADR Program Analyst
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
THE COURT FINDS as follows:
An initial Case Management Conference was previously ordered and scheduled for 07/15/2021
in this action.
Pursuant to Rule 3.722(d) of the California Rules of Court, based upon the Court’s review of
the filed Case Management Statement(s) and the docket of this action, the Court determines that
appearances at the Conference are not necessary at this time, as this action is “at issue”; and
determines that the Case Management Conference should be vacated as all parties have indicated in
their Case Management Statements that they are agreeable to participating in the ADR Process.
In accordance with Local Rules 3.805 and 3.904, all parties referred to ADR must complete and
sign a Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court. The
Office of the Clerk is located at:
Clerk of the Superior Court, Civil Division
Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
400 County Center
Redwood City, CA 94063-1655
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The initial Case Management Conference is VACATED.
2. No later than 21 days from the date of this Order, parties must complete and sign a
Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court, pursuant to
Local Rule 3.904(b).
3. The ADR Process shall be completed no later than 90 days from the date of this Order.
4. Pursuant to Local Rule 0.2, Local Rule 3.805(h), and CRC Rule 2.30, the Court is empowered
to impose monetary sanctions of a minimum of $150.00 upon any party or their counsel for failure to
follow the requirements of this Order, or of the California Rules of Court, or of the Code of Civil
Procedure. If you fail to follow the requirements of this Order, you will be subject to an order to show
cause as to why monetary sanctions of $150.00, or some other amount, should not be imposed against
you.
5. PLAINTIFF(S) must serve this Order on all parties not listed on the Court’s proof of service
within five (5) days of the date of this Order.
DATED: 7/1/2021 Ernst A. Halperin
Honorable Ernst A. Halperin, CIVIL COMMISSIONER
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
400 County Center, Redwood City, CA 94063
(650) 261-5100
www.sanmateocourt.org
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
Date: 7/1/2021
In the Matter of: Deborah Skucas vs. County of San Mateo, et al
Case Number: 20-CIV-05519
I declare under penalty of perjury that on the following date I deposited in the United States Post
Office mail box at Redwood City, a true copy of the attached document(s) order continuing case
management conference, enclosed in an envelope, with proper and necessary postage thereon, and
addressed to the following:
Executed on: 7/1/2021
Neal I Taniguchi, Court Executive Officer/Clerk
By: /s/ Liliana Cervantes
Liliana Cervantes, ADR Program Analyst
Copies mailed to:
MIRALI VAZIRINEJAD THE BARNES FIRM LC
555 12TH STREET
SUITE 1470
OAKLAND CA 94607
JOSE GONZALEZ PO BOX 24325
OAKLAND CA 94623
Document Filed Date
July 01, 2021
Case Filing Date
December 09, 2020
Category
(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.