Breitkreutz Vs Breitkreutz

Case Number: 24STCP01476 Hearing Date: July 15, 2024 Dept: 9 The drivers license that Petitioner has provided does not match the DMV records, which is necessary for the Court to run a criminal history assessment. Petitioner is ordered to contact the Name Change Clerk in the Clerks Office, who can provide instructions on how Petitioner may have fingerprints taken for a California Record Review Live Scan and results sent to the Court Clerk. The petition is continued to October 14, 2024 at 9:30 am to enable Petitioner to provide sufficient information and fingerprints for a criminal history assessment. If Petitioner fails to follow these instructions and provide sufficient information to run a criminal history assessment prior to the next hearing date, the petition will be denied and dismissed without prejudice. The Name Change Clerk is ordered to run and complete a criminal history assessment prior to the continued hearing. Court Clerk to give notice.

Parties, or counsel if represented, are ordered to appear personally or remotely for hearing. You must notify the court and all other parties that you intend to appear remotely using form RA-010. In addition to providing notice, a Zoom link must be requested no later than one (1) court day before the hearing and shall be submitted to the Court through the Court’s website at https://www.amadorcourt.org/gi-zoomRequestForm.aspx.

IN RE: TABAG Case Number: 24CV-0204603 Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Ramsey Anthony Viloria Tabag also known as Ramsey C. Viloria seeks to change his name to Ramsey Viloria. All procedural requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied. The Petition is GRANTED. All future dates will be vacated, and the file closed upon the processing of the Decree Changing Name.

No appearances necessary. The petition for dissolution was filed on January 5, 2024 and a response was filed on February 9, 2024. The parties are ordered to serve their Preliminary Financial Disclosures (FL-140) and file a Declaration Regarding Service (FL-141) before the next court appearance. Parties are referred to the court’s Family Law Facilitator for assistance. The FLF is available via email at selfhelp@amadorcourt.org. Parties are also directed to the Judgment Checklist (FL-182) for the required documents to complete their dissolution. Further case management is scheduled for November 15, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 3. A Family Law CMC Statement must be filed and served at least 15 days prior to the CMC. (https://www.amadorcourt.org/localForms/familyLaw/FamilyLaw_CMC-STATEMENT.pdf)

Case Number: 24STCP01498 Hearing Date: July 15, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.

No appearances necessary. The Petition for Dissolution was filed January 16, 2024. A Proof of Service (FL-115) is filed. More than 30 days have passed since service and no Response is filed. Petitioner must file the form FL-165 and request entry of default and proceed to default judgment. Further case management is scheduled for November 5, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 3. A Family Law CMC Statement must be filed and served at least 15 days prior to the CMC. (https://www.amadorcourt.org/localForms/familyLaw/FamilyLaw_CMC-STATEMENT.pdf

FL-19-002701 – WHITTAKER VS GRAY Petitioner’s Request for Order re Enforce Judgment, etc.—HEARING REQUIRED. The Court finds that proof of service is on file and reflects valid and timely individual mail service of Respondent as required.  (Fam. Code, § 215(a).)  Respondent did not file a Responsive Declaration or written opposition.  Consequently, the Court is inclined to grant the requested relief.  However, a final judgment is already an “order” that the parties are bound to comply with and a further order to comply by the Court would be redundant.  That said, Petitioner’s claims all relate to that part of the judgment dealing with division of pension plans and this has not been accomplished due to Respondent’s non-cooperation.  Accordingly, the Court will not further delay proceedings by again ordering Respondent’s cooperation and, instead, finds good cause to appoint the clerk of the Court as elisor to sign the QDRO and other necessary papers on Respondent’s behalf.  But Petitioner must first submit a proposed order with the exact documents to be signed attached to it for review and approval by the Court.  (Local Rules, rule 7.08(A).)  Petitioner is free to use all the means to obtain information provided by the Civil Discovery Act if documents or other information has not been provided by Respondent.  (Fam. Code, § 218.)  And the Court will reserve jurisdiction over the issue of monetary sanctions against Respondent for the necessity of Petitioner having to file post-judgment motions to obtain Respondent’s compliance.

IN RE: BASSETT Case Number: 24CV-0204432 Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Brittany R. Basset seeks to change the name of her minor son. No proof of publication has been submitted. The Court requires a Certificate of Publication from the publishing newspaper before the Petition may be granted. Additionally, the father of the minor has objected to the proposed name change. An appearance by Petitioner and the father are necessary on today’s calendar.