We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Sean Halasz Vs. Superior Court Of The County Of San Francisco

Case Last Refreshed: 1 month ago

Halasz, Sean, filed a(n) General Criminal - Criminal case against Superior Court Of The County Of San Francisco, in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts Superior.

Case Details for Halasz, Sean v. Superior Court Of The County Of San Francisco

Filing Date

June 04, 2024

Category

Writ Of Mandate-Criminal

Last Refreshed

June 06, 2024

Practice Area

Criminal

Filing Location

San Francisco County, CA

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filing Court House

Superior

Parties for Halasz, Sean v. Superior Court Of The County Of San Francisco

Plaintiffs

Halasz, Sean

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Superior Court Of The County Of San Francisco

Other Parties

Frislid, Joseph (Attorney)

Kroll, Oliver (Attorney)

The People Of The State Of California (Third Party)

Case Documents for Halasz, Sean v. Superior Court Of The County Of San Francisco

Case Events for Halasz, Sean v. Superior Court Of The County Of San Francisco

Type Description
Docket Event ORDER STAYING TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
Docket Event WRIT OF MANDATE FILED BY PETITIONER HALASZ, SEAN AS TO RESPONDENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE FILED BY PETITIONER HALASZ, SEAN
See all events

Related Content in San Francisco County

Case

ROME ROSE VS. PROGRESS FOUNDATION ET AL
Jul 12, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS | OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS | CGC24616368

Case

GABRIEL ESPINOZA VS. JOHN TILLMAN COMPANY
Jul 09, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS | OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS | CGC24616241

Case

FMS-21-387355
FMS-21-387355

Case

FLOR DE MARIA LIRA DE MORAN VS. ROBERTO CARLO MORAN
Jul 09, 2024 | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITHOUT CHILDREN | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITHOUT CHILDREN | FDI24799949

Case

950 LOMBARD LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILIY VS. EIGHT FORTY ONE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED ET AL
Jul 12, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | CONTRACT/WARRANTY | CONTRACT/WARRANTY | CGC24616350

Case

CECELIA CLAIRE DOYLE VS. PATRICK JAMES THOMAS
Jul 10, 2024 | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITH CHILDREN | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITH CHILDREN | FDI24799955

Case

THE ESTATE OF FLORINDA HELENA PICAZO
Jul 12, 2024 | Ross C. Moody | PETITION FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION | PETITION FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION | PES24307491

Case

ISAIAH ANTHONY AVILA VS. BRYANA RANGEL
Jul 11, 2024 | PETITION FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILDREN | PETITION FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILDREN | FMS24387517

Case

CORA CAVE ET AL VS. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Jul 05, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | MASS TORT | MASS TORT | CGC24616182

Ruling

GARY EPIS ET AL VS. DEERFIELD PARTNERS INC. ET AL
Jul 11, 2024 | CGC23610500
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 11, 2024 line 4. DEFENDANT THEODORE TIMM MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS is continued to December 18, 2024. Supplemental opposition papers must be filed no later than December 3, 2024 and supplemental reply papers must be filed no later than December 11. 2024. Based on the papers that have been filed so far, plaintiff Gary Epis has not established that there are sufficient minimum contacts to support specific personal jurisdiction and does not assert that there is general personal jurisdiction. Mr. Epis' request to take jurisdictional discovery is granted. (Hardell v. Vanzyl (June 20, 2024) 2024 WL 3064170 *8). Other than jurisdictional discovery, no other actions of any kind may be taken in this case requiring any effort or expense by Mr. Timm until this motion is decided. =(501/HEK) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.

Ruling

FCS-21-355149
Jul 09, 2024 | FCS-21-355149
2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 5 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-21-355149 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: July 9, 2024 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 JOSE HERNANDEZ FAJARDO, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: ANNE COSTIN ) 11 ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 The parties are ordered to appear to provide an update about the current visitation 15 schedule. The parties may appear in person in Department 404 or remotely by Zoom video. If a 16 party chooses to appear by video, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions for Remote 17 Appearances in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 18 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, 19 the Court makes the following findings and orders: 20 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 21 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. 22 2) The parties have one child together, Kiara, age 3. 23 3) This matter is set for a review hearing following the Court’s May 17, 2024 custody and visitation 24 orders. 25 4) On May 17, 2024 the Court ordered the parties to file and serve updated declarations at least 10 days 26 before the hearing. 27 5) Mother filed a declaration on July 2, 2024, 7 days before the hearing. The declaration in in Spanish, 28 and Mother did not provide a translation into English, so the Court has not been able to review this 29 submission. 1 6) Father has not filed an updated declaration. 2 7) The parties are ordered to appear in Court to provide an update about the current visitation schedule. 3 8) Father continues to be awarded temporary sole legal and sole physical custody. 4 9) The Court will prepare the written order after hearing. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1

Ruling

K. QUILLIN VS. NOELLE BECKER MORENO ET AL
Jul 10, 2024 | CGC24611734
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 10, 2024, Line 11. DEFENDANT NOELLE MORENO's MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT. Off calendar for noncompliance with Local Rule 2.7(B) (courtesy copies). The motion may be re-set for a Mon.-Thurs. after July 24, with papers to bear new hearing date. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)

Ruling

YERBA BUENA COMMONS ASSOCIATES, INC. VS. SCHOMAE OFLINDA ET AL
Jul 12, 2024 | CUD24675088
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 12, 2024 line 8. PLAINTIFF YERBA BUENA COMMONS ASSOCIATES, INC. MOTION To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories Against Defendant Schomae Oflinda; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Defendant to provide complete verified responses within 5 days of notice of entry of order. =(501/HEK) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear.

Ruling

EDWARD WESTERMAN VS. FTI CONSULTING, INC. ET AL
Jul 09, 2024 | CGC24615152
Matter on the Law & Motion Calendar for Tuesday, July 9, 2024, Line 12. PLAINTIFF EDWARD WESTERMAN's Motion To Seal. Plaintiff's unopposed motion to seal is granted. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)

Ruling

PRIMROSE ALLOYS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. MAXIM TUBES COMPANY PVT. LTD., AN INDIAN ENTITY
Jul 10, 2024 | CPF24518520
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 10, 2024, Line 1. PETITIONER PRIMROSE ALLOYS, INC.'s MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Petitioner's unopposed petition to confirm arbitration award is granted. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)

Ruling

FDI-23-798711
Jul 11, 2024 | FDI-23-798711
2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 5 ) 6 ALEXANDER KASHTAN, ) Case Number: FDI-23-798711 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: July 11, 2024 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 JOHANNA MLINAR, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: ANNE COSTIN ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS; REQUEST FOR ORDER: 13 PROPERTY CONTROL 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A. Procedural History 18 1) On for hearing is Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 2/21/2024 seeking exclusive temporary use, 19 possession, and control of the leased property located at 635 Quintara St. San Francisco, CA 20 94116. 21 2) On 4/12/2024, Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration asking the Court to deny Petitioner’s 22 request for exclusive control of the Quintara St. property. 23 3) Also on for hearing is Respondent’s Request for Order filed 2/26/2024 requesting $20,000 in 24 need-based attorney’s fees and costs. 25 4) On 6/27/2024, Petitioner filed an FL-320 Judicial Council Form Responsive Declaration stating 26 that he does not consent to Respondent’s requested orders. The Responsive Declaration form 27 references a “Declaration of Alexander Kashtan attached hereto,” but no such substantive 28 declaration is attached to the Responsive Declaration form. Only Exhibit A, a Premarital 29 Agreement, is attached to the FL-320 Form. 1 B. Findings and Orders 2 1) Per the Temporary Restraining Order filed 4/2/2024 in related Case No. FDV-24-817501, 3 Petitioner (Mr. Kashtan) was ordered to vacate the property located at 635 Quintara St. San 4 Francisco, CA 94116. There is a hearing set for 8/14/2024 at 1:45 PM in Dept. 404 in the FDV 5 case on Respondent (Ms. Milnar)’s Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order. Because 6 there is currently an order in place restricting Petitioner (Mr. Kashtan)’s access to the Quintara St. 7 property, the hearing on Petitioner (Mr. Kashtan)’s Request for Order filed 2/21/2024 is hereby 8 continued to 8/15/2024 at 1:45 PM to join the hearing on Respondent (Ms. Milnar)’s Request for 9 Domestic Violence Restraining Order. The Court’s 4/2/2024 Temporary Restraining Order will 10 remain in place until this 8/15/24 hearing. 11 2) Respondent’s attorney has not filed a declaration providing the Court or Petitioner with 12 “sufficient information about the attorney's hourly billing rate; the nature of the litigation; the 13 attorney's experience in the particular type of work demanded; the fees and costs incurred or 14 anticipated; and why the requested fees and costs are just, necessary, and reasonable,” as required 15 by California Rules of Court, rule 5.427(b)(2). The hearing on Respondent’s request for need- 16 based attorney’s fees is hereby continued to Thursday, 9/26/2024 at 9:00 AM in Dept. 404. At 17 least 20 calendar days prior to the next hearing date, Respondent’s attorney shall file and serve 18 the requisite attorney declaration. Petitioner may file and serve a responsive declaration at least 19 10 calendar days prior to the next hearing date. Respondent may file and serve a reply declaration 20 at least 5 calendar days prior to the next hearing date. 21 3) Petitioner’s attorney shall prepare the order. 22 4) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 23 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 24 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 25 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 26 proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing within 27 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 28 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d). 29 1

Ruling

JAIRO REGALADO CANCHOLA ET AL VS. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC, ET AL
Jul 09, 2024 | CGC23610505
Matter on the Disocvery Calendar for Tuesday, July 9, 2024, line 4, 3 - PLAINTIFF JAIRO CANCHOLA'S, ANDREA RODRIGUEZ Motion To Compel Responses, Without Objections, To Plaintiffs' Form And Special Interrogatories (Set One) Continued to July 26, 2024. No JPT available. = (302/JPT)

Document

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A. VS. LLOYD JOHNSON ET AL
Jul 12, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616341

Document

SAN FRANCISCO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION VS. DAVID HOWARD FOSTON ET AL
Jul 11, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | COMMON COUNTS/OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT/COLLECTIONS | COMMON COUNTS/OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT/COLLECTIONS | CGC24616336

Document

JANE DOE PWP 030 VS. LYFT, INC.; A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL
Jul 08, 2024 | MASS TORT | MASS TORT | CGC24616232

Document

GILEAD TENOFOVIR CASES
Sep 04, 2019 | ANDREW Y.S | COORDINATION | COORDINATION | CJC19005043

Document

GREGORY OVALLE VS. ACQUITY REALITY INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL
Jul 05, 2024 | CONTRACT/WARRANTY | CONTRACT/WARRANTY | CGC24616215

Document

CORA CAVE ET AL VS. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Jul 05, 2024 | MASS TORT | MASS TORT | CGC24616182

Document

CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC ASSIGNEE OF WEBBANK VS. WILLIAM BALLANTYNE ET AL
Jul 10, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616272

Document

JAGVIR LAL VS. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC ET AL
Jul 10, 2024 | PRODUCTS LIABILITY | PRODUCTS LIABILITY | CGC24616278