We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Laurel Mckenna V. Matthew Mckenna

Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago

Mckenna, Laurel, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case represented by Wright, Steven G, against Mckenna, Matthew, represented by Pro Se, in the jurisdiction of Kent County, RI, . Kent County, RI Superior Courts with Sandra A. Lanni presiding.

Case Details for Mckenna, Laurel v. Mckenna, Matthew

Judge

Sandra A. Lanni

Filing Date

August 31, 2022

Category

Nominal Divorce Complaint

Last Refreshed

February 01, 2023

Practice Area

Family

Filing Location

Kent County, RI

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Parties for Mckenna, Laurel v. Mckenna, Matthew

Plaintiffs

Mckenna, Laurel

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Wright, Steven G

Defendants

Mckenna, Matthew

Attorneys for Defendants

Pro Se

Case Events for Mckenna, Laurel v. Mckenna, Matthew

Type Description
Hearing Contested Track Pre-Trial

Judge: Lanni, Sandra

Hearing Contested Track Pre-Trial
Heard and Continued

Judge: Lanni, Sandra

Docket Event to Enter
Docket Event of Decree Read into the Record
Docket Event of Assets, Liabilities, Income, and Expenses (DR6)
Hearing Nominal Track Merits

Judge: Lanni, Sandra

Docket Event of Assets, Liabilities, Income, and Expenses (DR6)
Docket Event of Appearance
Docket Event Returned Served
Docket Event Summons
See all events

Related Content in Kent County

Case

Bank of America, N.A. v. JESSICA SATTERWHITE GRAY
Jul 09, 2024 | Book Account | KC-2024-0653

Case

Donna Lautieri et al. v. Alexander Calenda, M.D. et al.
Jul 03, 2024 | Malpractice - Medical | KC-2024-0637

Case

Bank of America, N.A. v. STEVEN E FALLAS
Jul 09, 2024 | Book Account | KC-2024-0650

Case

Madison DiSanto v. Nicholaus Oliveira
Jul 03, 2024 | Kevin F. McHugh | Injunctive Relief | KC-2024-0635

Case

West Bay Recovery, Inc v. William Pine
Jul 03, 2024 | Book Account | KC-2024-0640

Case

Velocity Investments, LLC v. Kaitlyn Griffin
Jul 03, 2024 | Breach of Contract | KC-2024-0641

Case

Bank of America, N.A. v. JEFFREY M KELLY
Jul 09, 2024 | Book Account | KC-2024-0654

Ruling

SIERRA PACIFIC WAGE AND HOUR CASES
Jul 11, 2024 | 5235
SIERRA PACIFIC WAGE AND HOUR CASES Case Number: 5235 Tentative Ruling on Case Management Conference: This coordinated proceeding is on calendar for a Case Management Conference. The Court has reviewed the Case Management Conference Statements filed by Plaintiff Smith and Defendant Sierra Pacific Industries. STAY. The McDonald matter remains stayed pending appeal. CLASS NOTICE. The Court appreciates the efforts made by SPI in identifying employees placed at SPI by staffing agencies and is in agreement with SPI’s suggestions regarding the employees at SPI placed by Sonora Employment Agency. The Court invites Plaintiff McDonald to discuss the proposals made by SPI. MOTIONS. There are currently no motions pending in the Smith matter. Pending in McDonald are SPI’s Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with Court Order Due to Impossibility that was filed on August 31, 2023 and SPI’s Motion for Protective Order Regarding Preservation and Production of Video Camera Footage that was filed on September 1, 2023. Both motions are stayed. TRIAL DATES. McDonald is not presently set for trial. The Court notes that Plaintiffs in Smith filed their Third Amended Complaint on February 28, 2024. SPI filed an Answer on April 2, 2024. As the matter is now at issue, the parties should be ready to discuss a timeline for a Motion for Class Certification. FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE. The Court intends to set a further Case Management Conference and will discuss available dates with counsel.

Ruling

In re: Reed, Thomas Marcus
Jul 10, 2024 | 24CV01645
24CV01645 IN RE: REED, THOMAS MARCUS EVENT: Petition for Change of Name If proper proof of publication is submitted at or before the hearing, the Petition will be granted.

Ruling

DEGUDINO VS ALVAREZ
Jul 10, 2024 | FL-21-000328
FL-21-000328 – DEGUDINO VS ALVAREZ a) Petitioner’s Request for Order re Quash Subpoena—HEARING REQUIRED; b) Petitioner’s Request for Order re Spousal Support, etc.—HEARING REQUIRED, in part; DENIED, without prejudice, in part. a) For good cause, the Court is inclined to order an Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) regarding this motion pursuant to the Local Rules.  Counsel shall appear to be heard regarding the IDC and/or to schedule the earliest mutually available date for such. b) The child visitation, child support and spousal support requests require a hearing.  The bifurcation request is denied without prejudice as the required bifurcation attachment (FL-315) was not filed and served with the motion.  (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.390.)  The request for a pendente lite sale order of the marital residence is denied without prejudice as Petitioner does not offer any evidence that the alleged failure to make mortgage payments as ordered has resulted in the lender instituting foreclosure proceedings.  (Fam. Code, § 2108.)  Lastly, the request for a forensic economist to be appointed by the Court pursuant to Evidence Code section 730 is also denied without prejudice as each party has the right and ability to select and retain their own expert witnesses under the Civil Discovery Act and no showing has been made that the Court will require an “independent” or “tie-breaker” expert in order to adjudicate the marital estate in this case. The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge David I. Hood in Department #25: THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.

Ruling

SIERRA PACIFIC WAGE AND HOUR CASES
Jul 10, 2024 | 5235
SIERRA PACIFIC WAGE AND HOUR CASES Case Number: 5235 Tentative Ruling on Case Management Conference: This coordinated proceeding is on calendar for a Case Management Conference. The Court has reviewed the Case Management Conference Statements filed by Plaintiff Smith and Defendant Sierra Pacific Industries. STAY. The McDonald matter remains stayed pending appeal. CLASS NOTICE. The Court appreciates the efforts made by SPI in identifying employees placed at SPI by staffing agencies and is in agreement with SPI’s suggestions regarding the employees at SPI placed by Sonora Employment Agency. The Court invites Plaintiff McDonald to discuss the proposals made by SPI. MOTIONS. There are currently no motions pending in the Smith matter. Pending in McDonald are SPI’s Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with Court Order Due to Impossibility that was filed on August 31, 2023 and SPI’s Motion for Protective Order Regarding Preservation and Production of Video Camera Footage that was filed on September 1, 2023. Both motions are stayed. TRIAL DATES. McDonald is not presently set for trial. The Court notes that Plaintiffs in Smith filed their Third Amended Complaint on February 28, 2024. SPI filed an Answer on April 2, 2024. As the matter is now at issue, the parties should be ready to discuss a timeline for a Motion for Class Certification. FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE. The Court intends to set a further Case Management Conference and will discuss available dates with counsel.

Ruling

Dunes Ranch Residential Community, LLC vs. Parsons, et al.
Jul 11, 2024 | 23CVG-00175
PARSONS, ET AL. Case Number: 23CVG-00175 This matter is on calendar for status of accounting. The Inventory and Accounting have been filed pursuant to California Civil Code section 798.61. The clerk is directed to close the file. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Ruling

MARTINEZ VS RIVAS
Jul 11, 2024 | FL-21-000664
FL-21-000664 – MARTINEZ VS RIVAS Petitioner’s Request for Order re “Other,” etc.—HEARING REQUIRED. Judgment in this matter was entered on January 2, 2024 and provided, in relevant part, that Respondent was awarded as her separate property “the Youngstown property and the vacant lot in Turlock” with the obligation to remove Petitioner’s name from the deed(s) and any loans within no more than six (6) months at the latest, with the Court reserving jurisdiction over this matter expressly.  (Judgment, p. 18 of 22, ¶ No. 2.)  Petitioner asks that the Court order Respondent to comply but the Judgment itself is already an order and the parties are each required to cooperate in effectuating the terms of the judgment.  Respondent’s declaration states that she has been diligently pursuing the necessary refinance but that Petitioner’s own actions have made the process more difficult and more expensive by unilaterally cancelling the homeowner’s insurance coverage and by unilaterally terminating the automatic bank payments to the lender.  It has been widely publicized and is a matter of common knowledge such that the Court may take judicial notice of the fact that major, nationwide insurance companies have been cancelling homeowner’s policies in California and have either sought to withdraw entirely from the California market or else are seeking large premium increases from the California Department of Insurance in order to remain in-market.  (Evid. Code, §§ 451(f) [Facts and propositions of generalize knowledge that are so universally known that they cannot reasonably be the subject of dispute]; 452(g) [Facts and propositions that are of such common knowledge within the territorial jurisdiction of the court that they cannot reasonably be the subject of dispute]; 455(a) [court may take judicial notice on its own motion provided parties are given the opportunity to be heard].)  As such, subject to the testimony and evidence that may be offered at the hearing, the Court is inclined to deny Petitioner’s request without prejudice or else continue the hearing to allow Respondent further time to comply with the Judgment.  Either way, the Court will continue to reserve jurisdiction over this issue and also the issue of whether either party’s conduct warrants the imposition of monetary sanctions and/or an award of fees and costs for failure to cooperate and comply with the terms of the Judgment.  (Fam. Code, § 271.) The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13: THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES. The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sweena Pannu in Department #14:

Ruling

In Re: Pursell
Jul 10, 2024 | 24CV-0204719
IN RE: PURSELL Case Number: 24CV-0204719 Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Kim Curtis Pursell seeks to change his name to Curtis Pursell. All procedural requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied. The Petition is GRANTED. All future dates will be vacated and the file closed upon the processing of the Decree Changing Name.

Ruling

In Re: Pursell
Jul 11, 2024 | 24CV-0204719
IN RE: PURSELL Case Number: 24CV-0204719 Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Kim Curtis Pursell seeks to change his name to Curtis Pursell. All procedural requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied. The Petition is GRANTED. All future dates will be vacated and the file closed upon the processing of the Decree Changing Name.

Ruling

In re: Calderon, Ashley Rosales
Jul 10, 2024 | 24CV01411
24CV01411 IN RE: CALDERON, ASHLEY ROSALES EVENT: Petition for Change of Name The Court will hear from the parties. 2|Page ||7. 24CV01487 IN RE: BREWER, CINDY LEE EVENT: Petition for Change of Name The Court will hear from the Petitioner.

Document

Brian Anctil VS Gabrielle Fletcher
Mar 26, 2024 | Civil Domestic without Claim for absolute divorce | Civil Domestic without Claim for absolute divorce | 24CV010059-910

Document

Evelyn Marie Kelley VS Ryan O'Connor
Jul 03, 2024 | Civil Domestic without Claim for absolute divorce | Civil Domestic without Claim for absolute divorce | 24CV020814-910

Document

WEST COAST SERVICING INC-vs-KIM DORSEY,UNKNOWN OWNERS AND NON-RECORD CLAIMANTS
Jun 28, 2024 | Jean Margaret Cocozza | Owner Occupied Single-Family Home/Condo | 2024-CH-06094

Document

LANDERS VS LANDERS
Mar 28, 2024 | Hamil, R | Divorce | Divorce | 24-A-02770-8

Document

Lylyana Hudson VS Christopher Ray Jackson Hudson
Jul 02, 2024 | Civil Domestic with Absolute Divorce | Civil Domestic with Absolute Divorce | 24CV030264-590

Document

BRADY RIDDLE VS SHAWNA H. RIDDLE
Jul 02, 2024 | Civil Domestic with Absolute Divorce | Civil Domestic with Absolute Divorce | 24CV001524-180

Document

In the Marriage of Amber Leigh Swanson and Brett Michael Swanson
Jul 23, 2021 | Street, James J. | Dissolution with Child | Dissolution with Child | 62-FA-21-1151

Document

In the Marriage of Amber Leigh Swanson and Brett Michael Swanson
Jul 23, 2021 | Street, James J. | Dissolution with Child | Dissolution with Child | 62-FA-21-1151