1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. Massachusetts
  4. Essex County Superior Courts
  5. Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 8 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Pierce, David, Udr Crane Brook, filed a(n) General Torts - Torts case represented by Finkel, Esq., Marc Edward, Gildea, Esq., William, against Sayer, Andrew Scott, Udr Crane Brook, represented by Arnold, Esq., Melissa Solar, Coakley, Esq., John P, in the jurisdiction of Essex County, MA, . Essex County, MA Superior Courts with Salim R. Tabit presiding.

Case Details for Pierce, David v. Sayer, Andrew Scott , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Salim R. Tabit

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

January 29, 2018

Category

Torts

Last Refreshed

October 10, 2023

Practice Area

Torts

Filing Location

Essex County, MA

Matter Type

General Torts

Parties for Pierce, David v. Sayer, Andrew Scott , et al.

Plaintiffs

Pierce, David

Udr Crane Brook

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Finkel, Esq., Marc Edward

Gildea, Esq., William

Defendants

Sayer, Andrew Scott

Udr Crane Brook

Attorneys for Defendants

Arnold, Esq., Melissa Solar

Coakley, Esq., John P

Other Parties

Sayer, Brianna Marie (Other Interested Party)

Case Documents for Pierce, David v. Sayer, Andrew Scott , et al.

for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant, Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Statement of material facts

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant, Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Reply to Opposition to Cross Motion for summary judgment

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Opposition to Cross Motion for summary judgment filed by Andrew Scott Sayer

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Memorandum in support of Cross Motion for summary judgment

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Rule 9A notice of filing

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A Applies To: Coakley, Esq., John P (Attorney) on behalf of Sayer, Andrew Scott (Defendant)

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Motion to continue / reschedule an event 10/24/2019 02:00 PM Rule 56 Hearing

Date: October 21, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Certificate of Compliance Superior Court Rule 9C

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A Applies To: Gildea, Esq., William (Attorney) on behalf of UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North (Defendant)

Date: October 21, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion to continue / reschedule an event 10/24/2019 02:00 PM Rule 56 Hearing (#15.0): ALLOWED without opposition. (see affidavit at P#15.1). The hearing on the motion and cross-motion for summary judgment is continued to 1/9/20.

Date: October 21, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Original civil complaint filed.

Date: January 29, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Service Returned for Defendant UDR Inc: Service through person in charge / agent;

Date: May 01, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Plaintiff, Defendant, Defendant in a 3rd Party Claim David Pierce, UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North, Andrew Scott Sayer's Joint Motion to extend tracking deadline(s)

Date: May 30, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A Applies To: Finkel, Esq., Marc Edward (Attorney) on behalf of UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North (Defendant)

Date: August 09, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Memorandum in support of Motion for leave to file third-party complaint

Date: August 09, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Motion for leave to file third-party complaint

Date: August 09, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant in a 3rd Party Claim Andrew Scott Sayer's Statement of material facts

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Memorandum in opposition to Motion for summary judgment

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion to extend tracking deadline(s) (#11.0): ALLOWED An amended tracking order shall issue accordingly. [endorsement dated 11/16/18] Judge: Karp, Hon. Jeffrey

Date: December 07, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Received from Defendant Sayer, Andrew Scott: Answer to the Third Party Complaint;

Date: October 09, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Service Returned for Defendant Sayer, Andrew Scott: Service made at last and usual;

Date: September 17, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion to extend tracking deadline(s) (#12.0): After review, motion ALLOWED The court adopts the proposed amended tracking deadlines.

Date: August 16, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Stipulation of dismissal with Prejudice, without Costs as to UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's 3rd party complaint **only as to Count II - entitled "Common Law Indemnity"

Date: November 14, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Received from Defendant UDR Inc: Answer with claim for trial by jury;

Date: April 27, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Plaintiff, Defendant David Pierce, UDR Inc's Joint Motion to substitute party defendant

Date: May 24, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Opposition to Motion to amend the 3rd party complaint filed by Brianna Marie Sayer

Date: August 22, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant, Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Motion to amend the 3rd party complaint

Date: August 22, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion to amend the 3rd party complaint (#13.0): Withdrawn This has been withdrawn at request of Defendant, Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim. See P#18

Date: November 18, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Assented to Motion to Withdraw Motion to amend the 3rd party complaint (P#13)

Date: November 14, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A Applies To: Finkel, Esq., Marc Edward (Attorney) on behalf of UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North (Defendant)

Date: August 22, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Memorandum in support of Motion to amend the 3rd party complaint

Date: August 22, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion for summary judgment, MRCP 56 (#14.4): DENIED See Memorandum of Decision at #20. (5/6/20)

Date: May 07, 2020
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Rule 9A notice of filing

Date: November 21, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

MEMORANDUM & ORDER: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT ANDREW SCOTT SAYER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (PAPER NO. 14) AND DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF UDR CRANE BROOK LLC D/B/A 14 NORTH'S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (PAPER NO. 14.4) For the above reasons, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Third-Party Defendant Andrew Scott Sayer's Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 14) is ALLOWED. 2. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff UDR Crane Brook LLC D/B/A 14 North's Cross-Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (Paper No. 14.4) is DENIED. 3. Judgment Of Dismissal SHALL ENTER on Count I (breach of contract) of the Third-Party Complaint. 4. This matter stands DISMISSED. (5/6/20) Judge: Karp, Hon. Jeffrey

Date: May 07, 2020
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion for summary judgment, MRCP 56 (#14.0): ALLOWED See Memorandum of Decision at #20. (5/6/20)

Date: May 07, 2020
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion for leave to file third-party complaint (#7.0): ALLOWED after review, and no opposition being filed. Judge: Tabit, Hon. Salim

Date: August 10, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion to continue / reschedule an event 01/09/2020 02:00 PM Rule 56 Hearing (#19.0): ALLOWED summary judgment is continued to 2/20/20 @2pm

Date: December 02, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion to substitute party defendant (#6.0): ALLOWED Judge: Tabit, Hon. Salim

Date: May 30, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

SUMMARY JUDGMENT for Defendant in a 3rd Party Claim(s), Andrew Scott Sayer against Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim(s), UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North, without statutory costs.It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: That Count I (the only remaining Count of the Third-Party Complaint of UDR Crane Brook D/B/A 14 North) be and hereby is DISMISSED.

Date: May 07, 2020
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

3rd Party Complaint filed.

Date: August 15, 2018
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Request for hearing filed Applies To: UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North (Defendant)

Date: August 22, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Rule 9A list of documents filed.

Date: August 22, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Rule 9A notice of filing

Date: August 22, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant in a 3rd Party Claim Andrew Scott Sayer's Motion for summary judgment, MRCP 56

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant, Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Reply to Opposition to Motion to amend the 3rd party complaint

Date: August 22, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant in a 3rd Party Claim Andrew Scott Sayer's Motion to continue / reschedule an event 01/09/2020 02:00 PM Rule 56 Hearing

Date: November 21, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A Applies To: Coakley, Esq., John P (Attorney) on behalf of Sayer, Andrew Scott (Defendant)

Date: November 21, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Stipulation of dismissal with Prejudice, without Costs as to David Pierce's original complaint Applies To: UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North (Defendant)

Date: November 14, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Defendant, Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North's Cross Motion for summary judgment, MRCP 56

Date: August 23, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Endorsement on Motion to Withdraw Motion to amend the 3rd party complaint (P#13) (#18.0): ALLOWED

Date: November 18, 2019
for Pierce, David Et Al Vs. Udr Crane Brook Doing Business As 14 North Et Al

Request for hearing filed Applies To: Sayer, Andrew Scott (Defendant)

Date: August 23, 2019

Case Events for Pierce, David v. Sayer, Andrew Scott , et al.

Date Type Description
May 07, 2020 Docket Event Endorsement on Motion for summary judgment, MRCP 56 (#14.4): DENIED See Memorandum of Decision at #20. (5/6/20)
View Document
May 07, 2020 Docket Event MEMORANDUM & ORDER: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT ANDREW SCOTT SAYER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (PAPER NO. 14) AND DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF UDR CRANE BROOK LLC D/B/A 14 NORTH'S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (PAPER NO. 14.4) For the above reasons, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Third-Party Defendant Andrew Scott Sayer's Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 14) is ALLOWED. 2. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff UDR Crane Brook LLC D/B/A 14 North's Cross-Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (Paper No. 14.4) is DENIED. 3. Judgment Of Dismissal SHALL ENTER on Count I (breach of contract) of the Third-Party Complaint. 4. This matter stands DISMISSED. (5/6/20) Judge: Karp, Hon. Jeffrey

Judge: Karp, Jeffrey
View Document
May 07, 2020 Docket Event Endorsement on Motion for summary judgment, MRCP 56 (#14.0): ALLOWED See Memorandum of Decision at #20. (5/6/20)
View Document
May 07, 2020 Docket Event SUMMARY JUDGMENT for Defendant in a 3rd Party Claim(s), Andrew Scott Sayer against Plaintiff in a 3rd Party Claim(s), UDR Crane Brook Doing Business as 14 North, without statutory costs.It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: That Count I (the only remaining Count of the Third-Party Complaint of UDR Crane Brook D/B/A 14 North) be and hereby is DISMISSED.
View Document
February 20, 2020 Docket Event Matter taken under advisement: Rule 56 Hearing scheduled on: 02/20/2020 02:00 PM Has been: Held - Under advisement Comments: FTR COURTROOM 3, SESSION D. (Start time: 3:03:31 p.m. end time: 3:28:07 p.m. ) Hon. Jeffrey Karp, Presiding Staff: Jose Mejia, Assistant Clerk Magistrate

Judge: Karp, Jeffrey

December 03, 2019 Docket Event The following form was generated: Notice to Appear for Rule 56 Hearing (2/20/20) Sent On: 12/03/2019 12:29:31
December 03, 2019 Docket Event Event Result:: Rule 56 Hearing scheduled on: 01/09/2020 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: Request of Defendant Hon. Jeffrey Karp, Presiding Staff: Jose Mejia, Assistant Clerk Magistrate

Judge: Karp, Jeffrey

December 02, 2019 Docket Event Endorsement on Motion to continue / reschedule an event 01/09/2020 02:00 PM Rule 56 Hearing (#19.0): ALLOWED summary judgment is continued to 2/20/20 @2pm
View Document
November 21, 2019 Docket Event Rule 9A notice of filing
View Document
November 21, 2019 Docket Event Defendant in a 3rd Party Claim Andrew Scott Sayer's Motion to continue / reschedule an event 01/09/2020 02:00 PM Rule 56 Hearing
View Document
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.