418.11.
An appearance at a hearing at which ex parte relief is sought, or an appearance at a hearing for which an ex parte application for a provisional remedy is made, is not a general appearance and does not constitute a waiver of the right to make a motion under Section 418.10.
Thus, section 418.11 applies, and Defendants opposition to the ex parte in this case was not a general appearance. 2. Validity of Substitute Service Defendant next argues the substitute service here was invalid. CCP section 415.20(b) provides for substitute service on an individual.
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY VS ELIAS C. LINN AN INDIVIDUAL DOING BUSINESS AS ELIAS TRUCKING
22STCV34233
Mar 06, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
California Civil Procedure Section 418.11 states, "An appearance at a hearing at which ex parte relief is sought, or an appearance at a hearing for which an ex parte application for a provisional remedy is made, is not a general appearance and does not constitute a waiver of the right to make a motion under Section 418.10." Plaintiff shall be prepared to discuss whether further service of the summons, even though the Hague Convention, would allow this case to proceed.
THE SHIRLEY F BERMOND ESTATE VS. FRANK HIRTH PLC
37-2016-00030602-CU-BT-CTL
Jul 27, 2017
San Diego County, CA
Business
Intellectual Property
Section 418.11 does allow a defendant to oppose an ex parte application for a provisional remedy without making a general appearance, but that exception may not extend to opposing the preliminary injunction itself. (Factor Health Mgmt. v. Sup.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE VS CROWN CITY CBD
RIC2000955
Aug 19, 2020
Riverside County, CA
Moreover, although the request to set aside the default was by ex parte application rather than by noticed motion, section 418.11 does not prevent the application from being a general appearance. (Factor Health Management v. Superior Court (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 246, 251 [section 418.11 extends only to ex parte application for provisional relief].) As a matter of logic, a motion for relief from default under section 473, subdivision (b), cannot categorically constitute a general appearance.
US BANK NA VS BONGMAN SUH ET AL
1402465
Nov 13, 2012
Santa Barbara County, CA
An order to show cause for a preliminary injunction is not within the scope of section 418.11, which extends only to ex parte applications for provisional relief…. their conduct of discovery involved the merits of the case… therefore constituted a general appearance in the action”).) Pursuant to CCP § 403 and 404.1, and CRC 3.500, the Court now finds as follows: The actions are not presently complex.
FIBERSPHERE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC V. POWERS
30-2018-00975575-CU-BC-CJC
Mar 21, 2019
Orange County, CA
Apr 30, 2007
Dismissal
San Diego County
San Diego County, CA
Contract - Other
Commercial
Breach of Contract
Section 418.10.
17 pages
WNC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Dec-08-2009 11:38 am Case Number: CGC-09-488187 Filing Date: Dec-08-2009 11:38 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02698012 RECORD REMANDED BACK TO SUPERIOR COURT .P, ACALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al VS. UNITED AMERICAN BANK, A CALIF: 001002698012 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenu…
May 08, 2009
San Francisco County, CA
Dec 08, 2009
CONTRACT/WARRANTY
4 pages
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 MICHAEL KANACH (SBN: 271215) GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-3211 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 mkanach@gsrm.com Attorney for Defendants ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 02/04/2019 Clerk of the Court BY: KALENE APOLONIO Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANC…
Dec 03, 2018
San Francisco County, CA
Feb 04, 2019
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/25/2020 09:12 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk 1 KASHFIAN & KASHFIAN LLP R YAN D. KASHFIAN , ESQ. (SBN: 265293) 2 ryan@kashfianlaw.com R OBERT A. KASHFIAN , ESQ. (SBN: 263173) 3 robert@kashfianlaw.com 4 NA…
Los Angeles County, CA
Jun 25, 2020
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
2 pages
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Northwest District, Van Nuys Courthouse East, Department U 21VECV00575 May 10, 2021 EUROPLAY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, A DELAWARE 8:30 AM LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, et al. vs PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Judge: Honorab…
Los Angeles County, CA
May 10, 2021
Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction)
19 pages
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/14/2023 12:00 AM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Estorga,Deputy Clerk Todd A, Brisco, Esq, [State Bar No. 165935] Allison lk. Iligley, Esq. [State Bar No.306953] Veronica R. Guzman„Esq. I State Bar No. 271845'I rODD A. BRISCO X ASSOCIATES. APC 2200 West Orangewood Avenue Suite 250 …
Los Angeles County, CA
Feb 14, 2023
Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Your content views addon has successfully been added.
No Worries!
Adding your team is easy
in the "Manage Company Users" tab
