The Honorable Jay M. Bloom

San Diego County Superior Court, Department SD-2202

Thumbnail of judge report

Discover if Hon. Bloom is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample

Download Hon. Bloom Report

Biography

The Hon. Jay M. Bloom is a judge for the Superior Court of San Diego County in California. He was initially appointed to the Municipal Court of San Diego by former governor George Deukmejian in 1991, filling a vacancy created by the elevation of the Hon. Allan Preckel to the Superior Court of San Diego County.

Bloom earned a B.A. from the University of California. He then received a J.D. from the University of California, Los Angeles in 1971.

He began his legal career as a deputy attorney general in the Office of the Attorney General of California. During his nineteen-year tenure there, he led the state in its efforts to execute Robert Alton Harris for the murders of two San Diego teenagers in 1979.

Recent Rulings by Hon. Jay M. Bloom

  • MICHAEL SELLERS VS. RANCHO BERNARDO SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB

    Oct 31, 2018 |  San Diego County

    Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is granted, in part, and denied, in part. The motion is granted to the extent it conforms to the January 4, 2018 Stipulation and Order, and denied in all other respects. Consistent with the court's prior April 30, 2018 order, the court approves the settlem...

  • MICHAEL SELLERS VS. RANCHO BERNARDO SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB

    Oct 31, 2018 |  San Diego County

    Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is granted, in part, and denied, in part. The motion is granted to the extent it conforms to the January 4, 2018 Stipulation and Order, and denied in all other respects. Consistent with the court's prior April 30, 2018 order, the court approves the settlem...

  • VELASCO VS. FLOWING STREAMS OF NEVADA LLC

    Sep 06, 2018 |  San Diego County

    Defendants' Motion for an Order Enforcing Terms of Stipulation for Settlement or Otherwise to Enter Judgment is granted, in part and denied, in part.

    Per Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, this court is empowered to enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation for Settlement signed b...

  • MICHAEL SELLERS VS. RANCHO BERNARDO SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB

    Aug 23, 2018 |  San Diego County

    Defendant's request for costs and fees is granted in the lesser amount of $5,500. The fees charged are excessive and plaintiff should not have to pay for time spent trying to settle the case. The court declines to consider many of plaintiff's arguments here as they are not responsive to the instant motion....

  • CAROL SPONG VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION

    Sep 14, 2017 |  San Diego County

    PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TAX COSTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. As to item 4(e), defendant is responsible for costs ordered by the court as it was, in essence, a sanction for late augmentation of an expert witness. Thus, the amount of $1,885.58 is taxed from defendant's cost request.

    <...

  • CAROL SPONG VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION

    Sep 14, 2017 |  San Diego County

    PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TAX COSTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. As to item 4(e), defendant is responsible for costs ordered by the court as it was, in essence, a sanction for late augmentation of an expert witness. Thus, the amount of $1,885.58 is taxed from defendant's cost request.

    <...

  • See More Results

Recent Rulings by Hon. Jay M. Bloom

  • MICHAEL SELLERS VS. RANCHO BERNARDO SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB

    Oct 31, 2018 |  San Diego County

    Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is granted, in part, and denied, in part. The motion is granted to the extent it conforms to the January 4, 2018 Stipulation and Order, and denied in all other respects. Consistent with the court's prior April 30, 2018 order, the court approves the settlem...

  • MICHAEL SELLERS VS. RANCHO BERNARDO SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB

    Oct 31, 2018 |  San Diego County

    Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is granted, in part, and denied, in part. The motion is granted to the extent it conforms to the January 4, 2018 Stipulation and Order, and denied in all other respects. Consistent with the court's prior April 30, 2018 order, the court approves the settlem...

  • VELASCO VS. FLOWING STREAMS OF NEVADA LLC

    Sep 06, 2018 |  San Diego County

    Defendants' Motion for an Order Enforcing Terms of Stipulation for Settlement or Otherwise to Enter Judgment is granted, in part and denied, in part.

    Per Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, this court is empowered to enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation for Settlement signed b...

  • MICHAEL SELLERS VS. RANCHO BERNARDO SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB

    Aug 23, 2018 |  San Diego County

    Defendant's request for costs and fees is granted in the lesser amount of $5,500. The fees charged are excessive and plaintiff should not have to pay for time spent trying to settle the case. The court declines to consider many of plaintiff's arguments here as they are not responsive to the instant motion....

  • CAROL SPONG VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION

    Sep 14, 2017 |  San Diego County

    PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TAX COSTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. As to item 4(e), defendant is responsible for costs ordered by the court as it was, in essence, a sanction for late augmentation of an expert witness. Thus, the amount of $1,885.58 is taxed from defendant's cost request.

    <...

  • CAROL SPONG VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION

    Sep 14, 2017 |  San Diego County

    PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TAX COSTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. As to item 4(e), defendant is responsible for costs ordered by the court as it was, in essence, a sanction for late augmentation of an expert witness. Thus, the amount of $1,885.58 is taxed from defendant's cost request.

    <...

  • See More Results

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.