California Laws|Section 482.120.

                                                

482.120.  

If the court determines at the hearing on issuance of a writ of attachment under this title that the value of the defendant’s interest in the property described in the plaintiff’s application clearly exceeds the amount necessary to satisfy the amount to be secured by the attachment, the court may direct the order of levy on the property described in the writ or restrict the amount of the property to be levied upon.

(Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 437.)

View Latest Rulings

While the court has discretion under Code of Civil Procedure section 482.120 to restrict the property subject to attachment, the court cannot exercise such discretion based on the briefing and evidence (or lack thereof) provided by Defendant Petrosyan.

  • Name

    PRIME ELECTRIC WHOLESALE, CORP VS ARA PETROSYAN, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    23STCV07227

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2023

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

While the court agrees that Plaintiffs are entitled to only one commission, no matter who pays it, Defendants have a remedy for wrongful attachment under CCP section 482.120 should Plaintiffs attach excessive property. Plaintiffs seek $9,442 in estimated attorney fees. This estimate is unsupported by an attorney declaration, but Plaintiffs acceptably rely on LASC 3.214’s schedule of attorneys’ fees. Nonetheless, no additional amount can be awarded.

  • Name

    D/AQ CORPORATION ET AL VS EDSON'S INVESTMENTS INC ET AL

  • Case No.

    BC709491

  • Hearing

    Sep 20, 2018

Furthermore, CCP section 482.120 directs the court to determine whether the value of the defendants interest in the property described in the plaintiffs application clearly exceeds the amount necessary to satisfy the amount to be secured by the attachment. (bold italics added.) Thus, the relevant question for purposes of excessive attachment is whether the value of Cross-Defendants personal assets clearly exceeds the amount of attachment.

  • Name

    TEXARKANA HOSPITALITY, LLC., A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL. VS BANK OF HOPE, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    21STCV33008

  • Hearing

    Oct 25, 2022

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

For this reason, Larsson requests that the court restrict the property to be levied upon to the Tennessee Avenue Property pursuant to CCP section 482.120. Larsson Opp. at 7-8. Larsson’s argument is based on conjecture. Bank is not limited to collection of a judgment through forcing the sale of real property. There are numerous reasons for Bank to seek attachment of property other than in real property.

  • Name

    CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS 30SIXTY ADVERTISING & DESIGN, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    20STCV34322

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

View More Rulings
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 482.110.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

ORIGINAL ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name and Address): TELEPHONE NO.: HLEO F6R C&OdXuSE ONIrY r—\ …

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

Mar 20, 2012

Category

Breach of Contract/Warranty

Judge Hon. Robert C. Hight Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Robert C. Hight
preview-icon 2 pages

ORIGINAL ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name and Address): TELEPHONE NO.: HLEO F6R C&OdXuSE ONIrY r—\ …

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

Mar 20, 2012

Category

Unlimited Civil

Judge Hon. Robert C. Hight Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Robert C. Hight
preview-icon 6 pages

DANIEL J. MULLIGAN [103129 Electronically JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP 4079 Governor Drive, 5015 wens or ‘S053 County of San Mateo San Diego, CA 92122 Telephone: (858) 529-2372 By. Is Marcela Enriquez Email: dan@jmglawoffices.com Attorneys for Defendant Walter C. Li SUPERIOR …

Case Filed

Jun 22, 2022

Case Status

Active

County

San Mateo County, CA

Filed Date

Sep 02, 2022

Judge Hon. Healy, Nicole S. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Healy, Nicole S.
preview-icon 6 pages

ann fe w DANIEL J. MULLIGAN [103129] JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP 4079 Governor Drive, 5015 San Diego, CA 92122 Telephone: (858) 529-2372 Email: dan@jmglawoffices.com Attorneys for Defendant Walter C. Li SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO BAYMARK FINANCIAL, INC. and MARGUERITE HEISER, Plaintiffs, v. WALTER C. LI and DOES 1 -20, inclusive. Defendants. Case No. Case No. 22-CIV-02538 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH…

Case Filed

Jun 22, 2022

Case Status

Active

County

San Mateo County, CA

Filed Date

Sep 02, 2022

Judge Hon. Weiner, Marie S. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Weiner, Marie S.
preview-icon 5 pages

di er eg ogre “eo. i ce *3097121* oN ~ 1 MONTE 8. TRAVIS [SB #84032] ROBERT P. TRAVIS [SB #182667] 2 TRAVIS & PON …

County

Alameda County, CA

Filed Date

Apr 12, 2004

Category

Unlimited Civil

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope