California Code of Regulations|§ 1632 - Floor, Roof, and Wall Openings to be Guarded

                                                

(a) This section shall apply to temporary or emergency conditions where there is danger of employees or materials falling through floor, roof, or wall openings, or from stairways or runways.
(b)
(1) Floor, roof and skylight openings shall be guarded by either temporary railings and toeboards or by covers.

Note: Requirements for guarding existing skylights are found in Section 3212(e) of the General Industry Safety Orders.Requirements for guarding existing skylights are found in Section 3212(e) of the General Industry Safety Orders.

(2) Temporary railing and toeboards shall meet the requirements of Sections 1620 and 1621. The railing shall be provided on all exposed sides, except at entrances to stairways.
(3) Covers shall be capable of safely supporting the greater of 400 pounds or twice the weight of the employees, equipment and materials that may be imposed on any one square foot area of the cover at any time. Covers shall be secured in place to prevent accidental removal or displacement, and shall bear a pressure sensitized, painted, or stenciled sign with legible letters not less than one inch high, stating: "Opening -Do Not Remove." Markings of chalk or keel shall not be used.
(c) Ladderway floor openings or platforms shall be guarded by standard railings with standard toeboards on all exposed sides, except at entrance to opening, with the passage through the railing either provided with a swinging gate or so offset that a person cannot walk directly into the opening.
(d) Hatchways and chute floor openings shall be guarded by one of the following:
(1) Hinged covers of standard strength and construction and a standard railing with only one exposed side. When the opening is not in use, the cover shall be closed or the exposed side shall be guarded at both top and intermediate positions by removable standard railings.
(2) A removable standard railing with toeboard on not more than two sides of the opening and fixed standard railings with toeboards on all other exposed sides. The removable railing shall be kept in place when the opening is not in use and should preferably be hinged or otherwise mounted so as to be conveniently replaceable.
(e) Pits and trap-door floor openings shall be guarded by floor opening covers of standard strength and construction. While the cover is not in place the pit or trap openings shall be protected on all exposed sides by movable standard railings.
(f) Manhole floor openings shall be guarded by standard covers which need not be hinged in place. While the cover is not in place, the manhole opening shall be protected by standard railings.
(g) Temporary floor openings shall have standard railings.
(h) Floor holes, into which persons can accidentally walk, shall be guarded by either a standard railing with standard toeboard on all exposed sides, or a floor hole cover of standard strength and construction that is secured against accidental displacement. While the cover is not in place, the floor hole shall be protected by standard railing.
(i) Where doors or gates open directly on a stairway, a platform shall be provided and the swing of the door shall not reduce the effective width of the platform to less than 20 inches.
(j) Wall openings, from which there is a drop of more than 4 feet, and the bottom of the opening is less than 3 feet above the working surface, shall be guarded as follows:
(1) When the height and placement of the opening in relation to the working surface is such that either a standard rail or intermediate rail will effectively reduce the danger of falling, one or both shall be provided;
(2) The bottom of a wall opening, which is less than 4 inches above the working surface, regardless of width, shall be protected by a standard toeboard or an enclosing screen either of solid construction or as specified in this section.
(k) An extension platform outside a wall opening onto which materials can be hoisted for handling shall have side rails or equivalent guards of standard specifications. One side of an extension platform may have removable railings in order to facilitate handling materials.
(l) When a chute is attached to an opening, the provisions of this section shall apply, except that a toeboard is not required.
(m) Wall opening protection shall meet the following requirements:
(1) Barriers shall be of such construction and mounting that, when in place at the opening, the barrier is capable of withstanding a load of at least 200 pounds applied in any direction (except upward).
(2) Screens shall be of such construction and mounting that they are capable of withstanding a load of at least 200 pounds applied horizontally at any point on the near side of the screen. They may be of solid construction, of grill work with openings not more than 8 inches long, or of slat work with openings not more than 4 inches wide with length unrestricted.

Notes

Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 8, § 1632

Note: Authority cited: Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference: Section 142.3, Labor Code.Authority cited: Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference: Section 142.3, Labor Code.

1. New subsections (d)-(h) filed 5-21-75; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 75, No. 21).
2. Amendment of subsection (a) filed 3-19-79; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 79, No. 12).
3. Amendment filed 1-14-86; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 86, No. 3).
4. Amendment of subsection (b) and repealer of subsection (e) and subsection relettering filed 5-2-96; operative 6-1-96 (Register 96, No. 18).
5. Amendment of subsection (b) filed 5-1-2002; operative 5-1-2002. Submitted to OAL for printing only pursuant to Labor Code section 142.3(a)(3) (Register 2002, No. 18).
6. Redesignation and amendment of subsection (b) as subsections (b)(1) and (b)(3) and new subsection (b)(2) filed 7-7-2004; operative 8-6-2004 (Register 2004, No. 28).

View Latest Rulings

Code section 1632, the statute of limitations is one year. (CCP section 340(a).) Plaintiff alleges that in 2013 Defendant violated Civ. Code section 1632 by failing to provide Plaintiff with Spanish-translated documents during the course of Plaintiff’s home loan t application process. Because Plaintiff brought suit well ore than one year later, on September 6, 2016, the first cause of action is barred.

  • Name

    HECTOR AVINA VS. BROKER SOLUTIONS, INC., ET. AL.

  • Case No.

    TC028554

  • Hearing

    Apr 04, 2017

  • Judge

    Brian S. Currey or John A. Slawson

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Civil Code section 1632, subdivision (k), provides for the recission of a contract for failure to comply with the requirement that a seller must provide a full translation of a contract or agreement negotiated primarily in Spanish to the buyer.

  • Name

    ELVIS J TORREZ VS GL LBT LLC, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    21STLC06427

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1632, subdivisions (b)(1)-(7), list the type of agreements covered by Civil Code section 1632 which include retail installment contracts (Civ.

  • Name

    RENTERIA V. SUBURBAN BUICK GMC CADILLAC

  • Case No.

    30-2020-01154611

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

This mortgage for real property does not state a cause of action under Civil Code section 1632, and no exceptions are alleged. No fiduciary relationship properly alleged in second cause of action. =(302/CWW)

  • Name

    YEONG JOO KIM VS. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC09493188

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2010

Third, even if Section 1632 did apply, it is clear that Plaintiff was still aware in at least 2010 that the ETrade loan was in the second position and had not been paid off based on statements by her in her bankruptcy filing. Thus, the statute of limitations still would have run by 2012 or 2014. It is also worth noting that the only remedy available for a violation of Section 1632 is rescission of the contract. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1632 (k).)

  • Name

    SALVADOR, MARIA LOUISA VS GULF HARBOURINVESTMENTS CORPORATION ET AL

  • Case No.

    MSC21-00650

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2024

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

Filed

Jul 09, 2009

Status

Removal

Judge

Hon. James R. Dunn Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for James R. Dunn

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Mortgage Foreclosure (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Property

Matter Type

Foreclosure

Filed

Jan 27, 2010

Status

Dismissal

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

Filed

Sep 04, 2009

Status

Removal

Judge

Hon. Ronald M. Sohigian Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Ronald M. Sohigian

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Property

Matter Type

Foreclosure

Filed

Apr 04, 2007

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Helen I. Bendix Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Helen I. Bendix

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

Filed

Aug 02, 2014

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Teresa Sanchez

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon Preview

t a @ David Valdez Jr. (SBN 209770) Law Office of David Valdez Jr. % 0 FILED 11100 Washington Blvd. Superior Co) urt of California Cc Culver City, California 90232 …

Case Filed

Jul 14, 2016

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Jul 14, 2016

Category

Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. David Sotelo Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for David Sotelo
preview-icon Preview

e David Valdez Jr. (SBN 209770) FILED Superio: Court of California Law Office of David Valdez Jr. ounty of Inc Annelas 11100 Washington Blvd. Culver City, California 90232 NOV 08 2017 Telephone: (310) 559-4529 Sherri Car…

Case Filed

Jul 05, 2016

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 03, 2017

Category

Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)

preview-icon Preview

as e — Aw024 David Valdez Jr. (SBN 209770) an Law Office of David Valdez Jr. …

Case Filed

Jul 05, 2016

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Jul 05, 2016

Category

Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)

preview-icon Preview

. wy @ XN David Valdez Jr. (SBN 209770) FILED Sup. arlor ourt of C, Law Office of David Valdez Jr. …

Case Filed

Jul 05, 2016

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

May 23, 2017

Category

Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)

preview-icon Preview

Yl at e @ David Valdez Jr. (SBN 209770) "Received Law Office of David Valdez Jr. wD LOS ANG ELES SUPERIOR CO FiLED 11100 Washington Blvd. 4, URT …

Case Filed

Jul 05, 2016

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

May 19, 2017

Category

Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope