California Code of Regulations|§ 439 - Purpose of Training and Development Assignments

                                                

(a) Training and development assignments shall be designed to provide employees the opportunity to obtain any or a combination of the following:
(1) Experience necessary to satisfy the experience component of the minimum qualifications of the training and development classification and/or gain competencies for the preferred or desirable qualifications of the training and development classification.
(2) Broader or more specialized competencies that will improve the employee's performance in his or her current position and classification.
(3) Prepare the employee for future promotion.
(4) Facilitate the employee's entry into a new occupational or career-related field.
(b) Where an employee has been selected for appointment to a deep class by way of a voluntary transfer and the employee will incur a loss in salary, exceptions to the application of Department rules and policies related to deep class salaries is within the authority and discretion of the Department and may include the temporary use of training and development assignments.

Notes

Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 2, § 439

Note: Authority cited: Section 19050.8, Government Code. Reference: Section 19050.8, Government Code.

1. Repealer and new section filed 3-4-2020; operative 7/1/2020 pursuant to Government Code section 18211. Submitted to OAL for filing and printing only pursuant to Government Code sections 18211 and 18213 (Register 2020, No. 10). For prior history, see Registers 92, No. 8; 89, No. 1; 86, No. 29; and 83, No. 22.

View Latest Rulings

(CCP section 439(a)(1).) The declaration before the Court fails to meet the requirements of section 439. First, it says that the parties exchanged e-mails. Self-evidently, this is not “in person or by telephone,” as the statute requires. Second, the declaration says that counsel for Allen attempted to “resolve the case prior to filing [the MJoP].” (Coad-Hermelin Dec. ¶ 3.)

  • Name

    CARTER ET AL. VS ALLEN ET AL.

  • Case No.

    MSC22-00036

  • Hearing

    Apr 17, 2023

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings The Court notes that moving defendants did not file a meet and confer declaration as required by California Code of Civil Procedure section 439. On the Court’s own motion, defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is CONTINUED to Friday, October 12, 2018 at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8. The Court orders counsel for the moving parties to meet and confer with plaintiff’s counsel in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 439.

  • Name

    RICK SIMPSON VS. RICHIE IEST FARMS, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    17CV-00945

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2018

Here, Defendant did not submit a declaration that complies with Code of Civil Procedure section 439. Therefore, the court CONTINUES Defendant’s (Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC’s ) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (filed on 3-7-19) to June 4, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in Department C19 to allow the parties to comply with the meet and confer process set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 439 to allow the parties to comply with the meet and confer process set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 439.

  • Name

    KARN V. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC

  • Case No.

    30-2018-00975890-CU-OR-CJC

  • Hearing

    May 14, 2019

Therefore, the court CONTINUES Defendant’s (The Irvine Company, LLC) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (filed on 2-14-19) to June, 18 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in Department C19 to allow the parties to comply with the meet and confer process set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 439 to allow the parties to comply with the meet and confer process set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 439.

  • Name

    MONTEJO V. SKYMASTER

  • Case No.

    30-2018-00970659-CU-PO-CJC

  • Hearing

    May 07, 2019

The parties shall comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 439 (effective January 1, 2018). Defendants’ counsel shall file the declaration required under Section 439(a)(3) not later than April 5, 2018.

  • Name

    FAIRBANKS, RICHARD VS. WELLS FARGO BANK NA

  • Case No.

    2021609

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2018

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

24 Files
Filed

Jun 15, 2018

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Holly J. Fujie Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Holly J. Fujie

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Filed

Jan 24, 2019

Status

Judgment (Other)

Judge

Hon. Pebet, Noelle Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Pebet, Noelle

Court

Fresno County

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Creditor

Matter Type

Collections

3 Files
Filed

Aug 10, 2018

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Etienne, Linda S. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Etienne, Linda S.

Court

Kern County

County

Kern County, CA

Practice Area

Creditor

Matter Type

Collections

Filed

Aug 09, 2022

Status

Active

Court

Superior

County

Placer County, CA

Category

Contract: Collections (09)

Practice Area

Creditor

Matter Type

Collections

8 Files
Filed

Jul 23, 2019

Status

Non-Jury Verdict

Judge

Hon. Tamara L. Mosbarger Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Tamara L. Mosbarger

Court

Butte County

County

Butte County, CA

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 4 pages

1 KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290 kallen@aghwlaw.com 2 MARIA NOZZOLINO, State Bar No. 302368 mnozzolino@aghwlaw.com …

Case Filed

Mar 29, 2023

Case Status

Active

County

San Mateo County, CA

Filed Date

Apr 03, 2023

Judge Hon. Fineman, Nancy L. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Fineman, Nancy L.
preview-icon 2 pages

1 Todd L Cramer State Bar No 157133 LAW OFFICE OF TODD L CRAMER 2 4032 Bay Street Suite A t Fremont California 94538 SUPERIOR COUR70F CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO …

Case Filed

Mar 25, 2019

Case Status

Closed

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Jun 25, 2019

Category

Rule 3.740 Collections$10,000.01 - $25,000 Limited

Judge Hon. Michael M. Dest Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael M. Dest
preview-icon 2 pages

1 I L 9L 1 Stuart M Richter SBN 126231 SUP FlIt R CGi 1RT Q C ALi ORNI COUNTv t3F N iERNARDENO Gre S Korinan SBN 216931 …

Case Filed

Jan 18, 2018

Case Status

Closed

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Aug 06, 2018

Category

Civil Rights Unlimited

Judge Hon. Thomas S. Garza Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Thomas S. Garza
preview-icon Preview

LAURA M. D ANNA ESQ. BAR #2661 13 I I SUPERIORFCAURT‘IEVQM Imam" PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. COUer 3c 5M, mpkmnmc …

Case Filed

Jan 03, 2023

Case Status

Active

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Feb 29, 2024

Category

Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited

Judge Hon. Tony Raphael Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Tony Raphael
preview-icon Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California LOUIS R. DUMONT - State Bar No. 130198 County of Los Angeles on JOHNNY RUNDELL - State Bar No. 289480 CARPENTER, ROTHANS & DUMONT …

Case Filed

Nov 16, 2017

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Apr 11, 2018

Category

Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Georgina T. Rizk Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Georgina T. Rizk
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope