Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(a) Training and development assignments shall be designed to provide employees the opportunity to obtain any or a combination of the following:(1) Experience necessary to satisfy the experience component of the minimum qualifications of the training and development classification and/or gain competencies for the preferred or desirable qualifications of the training and development classification.(2) Broader or more specialized competencies that will improve the employee's performance in his or her current position and classification.(3) Prepare the employee for future promotion.(4) Facilitate the employee's entry into a new occupational or career-related field.(b) Where an employee has been selected for appointment to a deep class by way of a voluntary transfer and the employee will incur a loss in salary, exceptions to the application of Department rules and policies related to deep class salaries is within the authority and discretion of the Department and may include the temporary use of training and development assignments.Notes
Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 2 , § 439Note: Authority cited: Section 19050.8, Government Code. Reference: Section 19050.8, Government Code.
1. Repealer and new section filed 3-4-2020; operative 7/1/2020 pursuant to Government Code section 18211. Submitted to OAL for filing and printing only pursuant to Government Code sections 18211 and 18213 (Register 2020, No. 10). For prior history, see Registers 92, No. 8; 89, No. 1; 86, No. 29; and 83, No. 22.
(CCP section 439(a)(1).) The declaration before the Court fails to meet the requirements of section 439. First, it says that the parties exchanged e-mails. Self-evidently, this is not “in person or by telephone,” as the statute requires. Second, the declaration says that counsel for Allen attempted to “resolve the case prior to filing [the MJoP].” (Coad-Hermelin Dec. ¶ 3.)
CARTER ET AL. VS ALLEN ET AL.
MSC22-00036
Apr 17, 2023
Contra Costa County, CA
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings The Court notes that moving defendants did not file a meet and confer declaration as required by California Code of Civil Procedure section 439. On the Court’s own motion, defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is CONTINUED to Friday, October 12, 2018 at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8. The Court orders counsel for the moving parties to meet and confer with plaintiff’s counsel in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 439.
RICK SIMPSON VS. RICHIE IEST FARMS, ET AL.
17CV-00945
Sep 21, 2018
Merced County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
Here, Defendant did not submit a declaration that complies with Code of Civil Procedure section 439. Therefore, the court CONTINUES Defendant’s (Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC’s ) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (filed on 3-7-19) to June 4, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in Department C19 to allow the parties to comply with the meet and confer process set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 439 to allow the parties to comply with the meet and confer process set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 439.
KARN V. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
30-2018-00975890-CU-OR-CJC
May 14, 2019
Orange County, CA
Therefore, the court CONTINUES Defendant’s (The Irvine Company, LLC) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (filed on 2-14-19) to June, 18 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in Department C19 to allow the parties to comply with the meet and confer process set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 439 to allow the parties to comply with the meet and confer process set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 439.
MONTEJO V. SKYMASTER
30-2018-00970659-CU-PO-CJC
May 07, 2019
Orange County, CA
The parties shall comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 439 (effective January 1, 2018). Defendants’ counsel shall file the declaration required under Section 439(a)(3) not later than April 5, 2018.
FAIRBANKS, RICHARD VS. WELLS FARGO BANK NA
2021609
Mar 16, 2018
Stanislaus County, CA
Jun 15, 2018
Dismissal
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles County, CA
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Commercial
Breach of Contract
Jan 24, 2019
Judgment (Other)
Fresno County
Fresno County, CA
Aug 10, 2018
Dismissal
Kern County
Kern County, CA
Aug 09, 2022
Active
Superior
Placer County, CA
Contract: Collections (09)
Creditor
Collections
Jul 23, 2019
Non-Jury Verdict
Butte County
Butte County, CA
1 KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290 kallen@aghwlaw.com 2 MARIA NOZZOLINO, State Bar No. 302368 mnozzolino@aghwlaw.com …
1 Todd L Cramer State Bar No 157133 LAW OFFICE OF TODD L CRAMER 2 4032 Bay Street Suite A t Fremont California 94538 SUPERIOR COUR70F CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO …
San Bernardino County, CA
Jun 25, 2019
Rule 3.740 Collections$10,000.01 - $25,000 Limited
1 I L 9L 1 Stuart M Richter SBN 126231 SUP FlIt R CGi 1RT Q C ALi ORNI COUNTv t3F N iERNARDENO Gre S Korinan SBN 216931 …
Jan 18, 2018
Closed
San Bernardino County, CA
Aug 06, 2018
Civil Rights Unlimited
LAURA M. D ANNA ESQ. BAR #2661 13 I I SUPERIORFCAURT‘IEVQM Imam" PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. COUer 3c 5M, mpkmnmc …
Jan 03, 2023
Active
San Bernardino County, CA
Feb 29, 2024
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California LOUIS R. DUMONT - State Bar No. 130198 County of Los Angeles on JOHNNY RUNDELL - State Bar No. 289480 CARPENTER, ROTHANS & DUMONT …
Los Angeles County, CA
Apr 11, 2018
Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.